Channel
@dgfi_conference
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
334subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001767455212 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dgfi_conference |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dgfi_conference |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Oct 2026, 13:01 | 334 | +4 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 00:22 | 330 | +5 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 22:37 | 325 | +2 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 16:40 | 323 | -5 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 20:37 | 328 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 329 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:48 | 329 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 27 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
27 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 14 | 51.9% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 22.2% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 22.2% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 3.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2026 to 18 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌐 Insights from our Speakers Thank you, Mariam Goishvili, for bringing the infrastructure perspective. A strong message stood out: Technology is not the limitation. From speed to scalability, the systems are increasingly capable of handling real transaction volume. One thing was clear: There is no shortage of opportunity.
🌐 Insights from our Speakers Thank you, Nato Bochorishvili, for bringing a true asset owner’s perspective into the conversation. A clear message: liquidity is always the priority. For real estate players, the search for new capital channels never stops - and tokenization is being taken seriously as one of those tools. The approach is deliberate: understand the mechanics, test the model, do the homework. The first …
🙏3
🌐 Insights from our Speakers Thank you, Rati Morchiladze, for bringing a real market perspective into the conversation. One point stood out repeatedly: tokenization doesn’t fix a bad asset. No structure, no technology, no distribution can compensate for weak fundamentals. The company itself has to be investable first. From a broker’s lens, quality of the issuer remains the foundation - everything else comes after.…
🔥4
🌐 Insights from our Speakers Thank you, Tamta Akhalkatsi, for bringing the issuer perspective into focus. For companies already active in capital markets, the question isn’t whether tokenization is interesting — it’s whether it actually improves access, diversification, and investor reach. The insight: tokenization becomes relevant only when it creates a better product than what already exists.
⚡1
🌐 Insights from our Speakers Thank you, Nikoloz Kandelaki, for cutting through the narrative and focusing on execution. One point was especially clear: Tokenization has to be backwards - compatible with systemic FIs. The industry will win once no one even knows that the asset being held/lent/traded lives on blockchain. The takeaway: the biggest gaps are not in technology, but in integration. And that’s where the r…
🔥1
🌐 Insights from our Speakes Thank you, Varlam Ebanoidze, for bringing the regulatory perspective that grounded the entire discussion. A clear message stood out: tokenization is not being ignored but it’s not being rushed either. From regulatory sandboxes to cautious market design, the focus is on building a system that can scale responsibly, not just experiment. The real balance: move too fast, and risk instabili…
🔥3
🌐 Insights from our Speakers Thank you, Aleksi Khoroshvili, for bringing the institutional lens into the conversation. A key insight: adoption won’t be universal - it will be sector-driven. Not every asset needs to be tokenized. But the right asset classes such as Bank Deposits, where efficiency, access, and liquidity improve, will lead. And most importantly, we need to understand where specifically the demand co…
🔥2
🌐 Appreciate GAUS Crypto for joining the Tokenization Forum as a partner. It’s important for us to work with teams that are actively engaged in the space and contributing to its development on the ground. Partnerships like this help strengthen the ecosystem and create more opportunities for meaningful collaboration. Thank you for the support and for being part of this journey.
🌐 Thank you to Superteam Georgia by Solana for being part of the Tokenization Forum. Having an ecosystem that actively supports builders and drives innovation at a global level added an important dimension to the event. It’s always valuable to bring that energy and perspective into the local market. We appreciate the contribution, the insights, and the continued commitment to growing the ecosystem, both globally an…
❤3
🏘 A big thank you to Gumbati Holding for supporting the Tokenization Forum as a Strategic Partner. What made this partnership especially meaningful is the connection between traditional industries and emerging technologies. With strong experience in real estate and commercial development, Gumbati represents exactly the type of forward-thinking business that can play a key role in bringing real-world assets into this…
🔥2
🔗 Grateful to have had Hadron by Tether as a Strategic Partner of the Tokenization Forum. Having a partner that is actively building the infrastructure layer for real-world asset tokenization brought a very real and grounded perspective into the room. This is exactly the direction the industry is moving towards, from concepts to actual financial products. With the backing and vision of Tether, Hadron represents a l…
🙏3
🌐 Real-World Assets Tokenization in Practice - From Concept to Market Adoption This is where things got real. Not “what if.” But “how do we actually do this.” With voices from Tegeta, Foresight, Gumbati Holding, VS1, and Solana Superteam — the conversation moved straight into execution. Key takeaways: — Tokenization is no longer a concept - it’s an operational challenge — Structuring real-world assets is complex: …
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @dgfi_conference. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DGFI - Digital Finance Conference | Tbilisi” (@dgfi_conference), 334 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dgfi_conference.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.