Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Спокойная одежда | Татьяна

Channel

Спокойная одежда | Татьяна

@dezindorflive

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

776subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002255462062
TypeChannel
Username@dezindorflive
CreatedBetween 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dezindorflive

Growth

7767947857 August 2026 — 794 subscribers8 August 2026 — 794 subscribers8 August 2026 — 793 subscribers14 August 2026 — 785 subscribers21 August 2026 — 782 subscribers27 August 2026 — 776 subscribers7 August 202627 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 20 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 773–797 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 19:13776-6
21 Aug 2026, 10:16782-3
14 Aug 2026, 21:24785-8
8 Aug 2026, 12:32793-1
8 Aug 2026, 01:45794no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:11794first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.35%
avg views ÷ 776 subscribers
Avg views / post
26.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
65.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 6 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held6 (4 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total26
Reactions total17
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
39s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

89 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3640.4%
🔥2224.7%
🥰2224.7%
👍44.49%
👏44.49%
❤‍🔥11.12%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 89reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 00:22 UTC26 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Дорого — это про цену или про ценность? Вчера пришла девушка подшить футболку. У нас цена — 500 рублей. Она оставила заказ, вышла и буквально через минуту вернулась: — Ой, нет, дорого. Забрала футболку и ушла. Ну, бывает. У нас цена за работу, а не за вещь. Мы не смотрим, футболка за 300 рублей или за 3000. У нас машинка производственная, специально для трикотажа. Строчка идёт идеальная, как на заводе. Она не тре

8🔥5🥰4

28 Jul 2026, 15:06 UTC45 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Две мечты,которые ждут У меня в детстве было не так уж много ярких мечтаний. Но в последнее время ко мне часто приходят две из них. И они такие простые, смешные, но я о них всё помню. Первая — я хотела научиться плести макраме. Но проблема была в том, что нужны были хлопковые верёвки. Именно из магазина, именно новые, а не из подручных материалов. А у меня на них не было денег. Сейчас я могу купить эти верёвки без

6🔥4🥰4

21 Jul 2026, 02:54 UTC63 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я пока не запустила свою линию одежды. Всё, что связано с брендом и коллекциями, — ещё в разработке. Сейчас основная моя работа — ателье. Я шью вещи на заказ. Это моё главное направление, моя опора и моя повседневность. И вот в этой повседневности случаются дни, когда всё идёт не по плану. Три дня назад я шила заказ. Платье-комбинация из двух частей: нижняя сорочка из гладкой ткани и верхнее кружевное платье. Снач

6🔥4🥰4

11 Jul 2026, 07:53 UTC65 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

После прошлого поста многие, наверное, подумали, что у меня уже всё придумано Что я точно знаю, какой будет моя одежда, какие модели будут первыми, какие цвета, какие коллекции. На самом деле нет. Я пока этого не знаю. Иногда смотрю, что сейчас продают, что носят, и понимаю, что не могу сказать: «Вот именно такую одежду я хочу создавать». Что-то нравится, что-то нет. И это нормально. Но зато я очень хорошо знаю

5👏3🥰3👍1

10 Jul 2026, 03:44 UTC57 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я хочу купить себе кое-что очень ценное ВРЕМЯ ! Кажется, пришло время пересмотреть, на что я трачу свои дни. Иногда мне кажется, что в сутках не 24 часа, а гораздо меньше. Работа есть всегда. Заказы, примерки, звонки, переписки... День заканчивается очень быстро. И в какой-то момент я поняла, что самое ценное постоянно откладываю. Не потому что не знаю, что делать. А потому что на это просто не остаётся времени

🔥63🥰3❤‍🔥1👍1👏1

4 Jul 2026, 11:36 UTC73 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я до сих пор боюсь разговаривать с новыми людьми Да. Даже спустя больше двадцати лет работы. Каждый раз, когда приходит новый человек, внутри всё равно появляется лёгкое волнение. А вдруг я не пойму, что именно он хочет? А вдруг не смогу объяснить? А вдруг человек уйдёт недовольным? Раньше я думала, что однажды этот страх исчезнет. Вот наработаю опыт — и стану уверенной. Но нет. Он никуда не делся. Я прост

8🥰4🔥3👍2

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @dezindorflive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Спокойная одежда | Татьяна” (@dezindorflive), 776 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dezindorflive.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.