Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

دژینو | dezhino

@dezhino

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

245subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001488847732
TypeChannel
Username@dezhino
Descriptionتشخیص و جلوگیری از ترافیک نامعتبر🥷 و انواع بات ها با کمک هوش مصنوعی👮در کمپین های تبلیغاتی از کجا شروع کنم؟👇 https://dezhino.com/ ادمین @mahsaazani
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/dezhino

Growth

2457 Aug 2026, 14:28 — 245 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 09:45 — 245 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 14:288 Aug 2026, 09:45
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 244–246 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 09:45245no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:28245first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 6 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.3%
avg views ÷ 245 subscribers
Avg views / post
74.2
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held13 (6 January 20265 August 2026)
Views total445
Reactions total33
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
72
Videos
5
Links
66

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

65 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3147.7%
👍1218.5%
🔥913.8%
👌69.23%
🎉34.62%
👏23.08%
🙏23.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 6 January 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 13 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dezhino. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 January 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC43 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔴 «کدوم IPها دارن بودجه‌ام رو می‌خورن؟» این سوال ساده‌ست. ولی جواب دادن بهش؟ یعنی export گرفتن از لاگ‌ها، اسکرول کردن هزاران ردیف، و بلاک دستی — که تا اون موقع، بودجه رفته. ما این مشکل رو با Auto IP Exclusion دژینو حل کردیم. نه دستی. نه تأخیر. نه محدودیت ۵۰۰ تایی گوگل. ⚡ چطور کار می‌کنه؟ ۱. ترکر دژینو سشن‌های مشکوک رو شناسایی می‌کنه ۲. موتور AI الگوهای رفتاری رو تحلیل می‌کنه (پروفایل‌سازی، ردپاگیری، رفتار کاربر)

2🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTC157 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🕵️‍♂️💻 آیا بالا بودن آمار ورودی (Reach) یک رسانه یا سایت تبلیغاتی، لزوماً به معنای کیفیت آن است؟ 🤔 به این نمونه واقعی که توسط آنالیتیکس پرفورمنسی دژینو (Dezhino) شناسایی و تحلیل شده است، نگاه کنید. به دلیل حفظ محرمانگی، نام ادنتورک و سایت نمایش‌دهنده حذف شده است: 📊 بررسی دقیق ترافیک ورودی از این رسانه: * 👤 تعداد کاربر: فقط ۱ شناسه کاربری واحد (User ID) برای کل ۱۰۱ سشن! * 🌐 تعداد IP متمایز: تنها ۳ آدرس IP! * ⏱️

2👌2👍1👏1

3 Aug 2026, 09:23 UTC41 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ارزش یک پرفورمنس مارکتر به گزارش کردن آمارهای گوگل نیست؛ به فهمیدن واقعیت پشت این آمارهاست! 🧠🎯 در کمپین‌های پرفورمنس مکس گوگل ادز (PMax)، سیستم خودش قیمت‌گذاری و اکران را مدیریت می‌کند. ⚙️ اما اگر ورودی‌های فیک و نامعتبر وارد کمپین شوند: هوش مصنوعی فریب می‌خورد و فکر می‌کند مسیر درست همین است! 🚨⚠️ در نتیجه: بودجه بیشتری به سمت کانال‌های مخرب هدایت می‌شود. 💸📉 اگر آمارهای گوگل مثبت است اما فروش افت کرده، وقت شک

2👌1🙏1

28 Jul 2026, 11:07 UTC61 views8 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

بدترین اتفاق کمپین این نیست که کانورژن نگیریم... بدترین اتفاق این است که اصلاً ندانیم چرا. چون ممکن است تمام تصمیم‌هایی که برای بهینه‌سازی کمپین می‌گیرید، بر پایه داده‌های آلوده باشد. در یکی از کمپین‌هایی که تحلیل کردیم، ۸۲.۸۴٪ از ترافیک ورودی تقلبی بود: • ۶۱۸ سشن تقلبی • هدررفت قابل توجه بودجه تبلیغاتی • گزارش‌ها و تحلیل‌هایی که تصویر واقعی کمپین را نشان نمی‌دادند بعد از فعال شدن ایجنت هوشمند ضدتقلب دژینو، نتیجه

6🎉1🔥1

25 Jul 2026, 07:23 UTC59 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🏆 برترین سورس‌های تبلیغاتی در تیرماه؛ یک هوش مصنوعی، بالاتر از گوگل، تلگرام و بله! 📊 #دژینو رتبه‌بندی ماهانه سورس‌های جذب کاربر را بر اساس شاخص "پرفورمنس اسکور" منتشر کرده است؛ معیاری که کیفیت کاربران را با تحلیل رفتار آن‌ها در طول قیف بازاریابی ارزیابی می‌کند. 🔍 چند نکته در این گزارش بیشتر از همه جلب توجه می‌کند: - اینستاگرام همچنان جایگاه اول را حفظ کرده است. - ادنتورک‌های داخلی، فارغ از مدیوم تبلیغاتی، سهم قابل

4🔥2🙏1

19 Jul 2026, 07:19 UTC84 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📈 این هفته کدام کانال تبلیغاتی بهترین عملکرد را داشت؟ بر اساس بررسی نتایج کمپین‌های اجرا شده در هفته گذشته: شبکه‌های اجتماعی - مطابق هفته های گذشته، شبکه های اجتماعی نقش پر رنگی در آگاهی برند و ایجاد لید برای کسب و کارها ایفا کرده اند. بله رتبه اول عملکرد تبلیغاتی را در این هفته نیز به خود اختصاص داد. همچنین تلگرام و اینستاگرام در رتبه های 4 و 5 برترین کانال های هفته قرار گرفتند. ادنتورک داخلی: کمپین های targete

2🔥2👏1

4 Jul 2026, 09:57 UTC104 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📊همه تبلیغات آنلاین، بازدهی یکسانی ندارند. وقتی از پرفورمنس تبلیغات آنلاین صحبت می‌کنیم، یکی از مهمترین سؤالات این است: کدام کانال های تبلیغاتی بهترین عملکرد را دارند؟ پاسخ به این سوال بستگی به موارد متعددی مانند نوع کسب و کار، هدف از تبلیغات، زمان تبلیغات و ... دارد. هدف ما در دژینو همواره افزایش پرفورمنس (بهبود عملکرد) تبلیغات آنلاین کسب و کارها بوده است. در راستای همین مسئولیت، از این پس بصورت هفتگی برترین

4🎉1🔥1

29 Jun 2026, 08:53 UTC103 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

بودجه گوگل ادز شما هدف کلیک‌فارم‌ها و رقبایتان قرار گرفته است؟ 🛑 بلاک کردن دستی IPها در پنل گوگل هم کند است و هم محدود به ۵۰۰ آی‌پی. در جنگ ثانیه‌ها با ربات‌ها، روش دستی یعنی هدررفت قطعی بودجه تبلیغاتی شما. 💡 راه‌حل: سرویس Auto IP Exclusion دژینو دژینو با اتصال مستقیم به Google API و استفاده از هوش مصنوعی، دفاع از بودجه شما را کاملاً اتوماتیک می‌کند. چرا دژینو؟ 🔹 گذر از محدودیت‌ها: بلاک رنج IPها پس از پر شدن ظرف

👍31🎉1🔥1

10 Jun 2026, 20:41 UTC128 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @startup360Photo

⭕️ دژینو از ایجنت هوش مصنوعی جدید خود برای مقابله با تقلب تبلیغاتی رونمایی کرد دژینو از نسخه جدید پلتفرم خود رونمایی کرده و مدعی است نخستین ایجنت هوش مصنوعی پرفورمنس مارکتینگ ایران را توسعه داده است. این محصول با هدف مقابله با کلیک‌های تقلبی، ربات‌ها و ترافیک‌های بی‌کیفیت طراحی شده و به صورت لحظه‌ای عملکرد کمپین‌های تبلیغاتی را پایش می‌کند. این ایجنت با اتصال مستقیم به API گوگل، امکان شناسایی و مسدودسازی هوشمند IPه

👍32

24 May 2026, 08:19 UTC164 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🛑 چرا در اختلالات و محدودیت‌های اخیر اینترنت، ابزارهای خارجی کشف تقلب (Fraud Detection) از کار افتادند؟ اگر کمپین منیجر گوگل ادز هستید، احتمالاً متوجه شده‌اید که در زمان قطعی یا اختلالات شدید اینترنت بین‌الملل، سرویس‌های خارجی مانند ClickCease ،PPC Shield و ClickGuard عملاً کارایی خود را از دست می‌دهند. اما دلیل فنی این اتفاق چیست و چرا پلتفرم‌های بومی مانند دژینو (Dezhino) در همین شرایط بدون مشکل به کار خود ادامه د

👌31🔥1

29 Apr 2026, 16:47 UTC191 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

📢 اطلاعیه کاربران عزیز دژینو لطفا در کانال "بله" دژینو عضو شوید🤝 http://ble.ir/dezhino

👍1

2 Feb 2026, 08:32 UTC254 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

تبلیغات گوگل ادزتون رو ران کرده اید؟

  1. بله33%
  2. خبر37%
  3. دیدن نتایج31%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @dezhino. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Feb 2026, 08:32 UTCAnonymous Poll52 voters

تبلیغات گوگل ادزتون رو ران کرده اید؟

  1. بله33%
  2. خبر37%
  3. دیدن نتایج31%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 6 January 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“دژینو | dezhino” (@dezhino), 245 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dezhino.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.