Channel
@dexartchannel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,181subscribers
-19 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001707814104 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dexartchannel |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dexartchannel |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:01 | 1,181 | -1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 21:36 | 1,182 | -4 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 18:57 | 1,186 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:38 | 1,187 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:25 | 1,190 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:53 | 1,191 | -5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:35 | 1,196 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 1,198 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:51 | 1,199 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:51 | 1,200 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 1,200 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
5 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 40.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 20.0% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 20.0% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 5 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
What Does AI Think About When Reading Your Novel? 📖 Not even close to what you think. At first glance, anyway. We're used to language models relying on dry numbers and probabilities, but the team at Goodfire decided to prove that's not the whole story. The researchers decided to look inside the "black box" and see how LLMs actually read short stories and track human emotions in them. The Geometry of Emotions️ ⭐️️️…
How Are You Using AI in 2026? 🧠 It's been three and a half years since generative AI burst into our lives. Year after year, user numbers keep growing and impressing. But what are people actually doing with this technology? Harvard Business Review analyzed 12,637 real-world cases of AI usage. The most popular use – isn't work️ ⭐️️️️️️️️ For the second year in a row, therapy and emotional support take first place. I…
Closing the Carbo Window with AI 🍔 Appetite comes with eating. And now, the recipe for the perfect burger comes from algorithms. Researchers at Stanford have developed BurgerAI, a neural network that designs burgers based on your age, preferences, and even sustainability goals. And yes, it doesn't just pick existing recipes, it creates new ones. How does it work?️ ⭐️️️️️ BurgerAI was trained on 2,216 real recipes …
❤1
Brave New World of Education 🤖📚 Exam session is over. Some have already exhaled, some are still waiting for that coveted "pass" or are deep in the admissions process. But imagine: you're writing your final paper or taking a written exam and it's not a tired professor checking it, but an algorithm. Sounds utopian, but the University of Hong Kong has already arrived at this. What happened?️ ⭐️️️️️ Professor Linjiang…
ai-slop → thinkslop 🧠 During the active use of artificial intelligence, we've grown quite accustomed to the term "slop", low-quality AI content that has flooded the internet. But it turns out that was just the tip of the iceberg. Harvard Business Review analyzed 12,637 real-world cases of generative AI use. The main takeaway: the list of things we've stopped doing ourselves has grown significantly. Researchers coi…
Do You Love AI as Much as South Koreans Do? 🇰🇷🤖 While most countries are torn between excitement and concern over AI, South Korea has its own vibe. Only 16% of South Koreans feel anxious about AI, the lowest among 25 countries surveyed by Pew Research Center. What makes South Koreans the most ardent fans of neural networks?️ ⭐️️️️️️️️️️ South Korea is one of the most connected countries in the world. They're ready …
AI Stormed the FIFA World Cup ⚽ Not by predicting match outcomes or replacing referees, but as a sportswear designer. Unexpected, yes. We're surprised too. What happened?️ ⭐️️️️️️ Nike, the official sponsor of many national teams, introduced a new line of jerseys this year with an attempt at innovation. Press releases talked about the cutting-edge Aero-FIT technology, which uses "computational design" to help athle…
Aren't We Overdosing on AI? 🎭 A perfect sunset, unnaturally smooth skin, a cat in space, a jump into water from a great height. What used to make us say "wow" while scrolling now makes us ask "where was this generated?". There's so much AI content now that many users are annoyed both for aesthetic and ethical reasons. And it seems platforms are finally responding to this fatigue. What are they already doing?️ ⭐️️️…
Who’s Reading This Post? 👀 We decided to check whether you’re human or a bot. Because it turns out there are already more bots on the internet. What happened?️ ⭐️️️️️️ Matthew Prince, co-founder of Cloudflare, predicted this shift in internet demographics wouldn’t happen until the end of 2027. But the rapid rise of AI agents changed the ratio faster than expected. According to Cloudflare data from early June 2026,…
🤩1
How Easily Do You Fall for Manipulation? 🎣 Do you notice them at all? And if you do, how quickly do you tell the person trying to influence you "no, stop, that's not going to work"? Congratulations. Now you can expect tricks not only in your pocket or at your workplace, because neural networks have turned out to be just as susceptible to the same tactics as any human. What happened? ⭐️ The Center for Democracy & T…
🔥1
"I Want to Look Like a Bratz Doll" 👀 These were the words of a woman during a visit to a plastic surgeon, where she presented an image generated by ChatGPT as her ideal reference. Enormous doll-like eyes, unnaturally plump lips, a chiseled jawline. Rachel Westbay, a cosmetic dermatologist from New York, was shocked: It's like saying I want to look like Ariel from "The Little Mermaid". What's happening?️ ⭐️️️️ Reme…
Promised to Support, But Went Against? 🤖 It seemed like only recently that the cardinals elected a new Pope. He stepped out onto the balcony and, in his first speech, said that artificial intelligence concerned him in a good way. He called not for fleeing progress, but for remembering who it is for. It sounded almost conciliatory, and many thought the Vatican was keeping pace with technology. But a year later, Pope…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dexartchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DEXART Metaverse Channel” (@dexartchannel), 1,181 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dexartchannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.