Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CALL CENTER

Channel

CALL CENTER

@devwyd1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,429subscribers

+17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002335769091
TypeChannel
Username@devwyd1
Created4 January 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/devwyd1

Growth

2,4092,4292,4197 August 2026 — 2,412 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,412 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,411 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,409 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,412 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,423 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,421 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,429 subscribers7 August 202626 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 19 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,406–2,432 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Aug 2026, 09:462,429+8
23 Aug 2026, 06:382,421-2
16 Aug 2026, 22:122,423+11
14 Aug 2026, 00:462,412+3
10 Aug 2026, 22:572,409-2
8 Aug 2026, 06:012,411-1
7 Aug 2026, 14:332,412no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:292,412first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

363 reactions across 16 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12333.9%
🔥10729.5%
👍5314.6%
🤣205.51%
😭133.58%
🙏123.31%
🤔92.48%
💯82.20%
👌61.65%
👀30.826%
😢30.826%
🤡30.826%
10.275%
🌚10.275%
🤬10.275%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 363reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 January 2025 to 24 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Mar 2025, 03:52 UTC≈8,950 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/devwyd/status/1904018361782002093

3👍1

8 Feb 2025, 01:09 UTC≈22,000 views58 reactionsread 7 August 2026

How issa/tate rugged 2.5 million on $YE The $FUCKMATT deployer 3 months ago sent 903.4 sol to 6nuS5et4RNY765ea7Y5Qe2MNBHUuiH65dBUgxzGgeiBS which fixed floated to GBBxvChD7Xc221Ref5vqmXo8NwFdLAKbekdf6EJxiDJj Which is a low activity wallet and sends out 10k sol at 14:37 UTC 2/7 (1 hour before $ye deployer gets funding) to 24vyME2ziqJwPMT6KSRpCFuPRUHiC14m83N8ZV4GmiZi then to 47JGWcEJLrGviPbcrais5h2Vnqa5g7qxep3

🔥3319👍3🤔3

7 Feb 2025, 20:18 UTC≈6,730 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Dave Portnoy is participating in Crime Szn

🤣8🌚1

24 Jan 2025, 02:15 UTC≈7,500 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

these hackers dont even try to hide

😭7🙏2👍1

24 Jan 2025, 02:14 UTC≈10,900 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://solscan.io/account/EaaucZx7GCW6MpAeLttsXx1hrqyjiNjxoseAtXtxLCJ7#transfers they farmed 3k sol earlier

🙏64😭2

24 Jan 2025, 02:11 UTC≈10,000 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://photon-sol.tinyastro.io/en/lp/HPdC3H5X6LA6VbcXhMxBxXfJLuVGX6dMhZnYwhgiHqTM?handle=2480537bdccb8735ce8d be careful of $Brazil they laucnhed this earlier

🙏4🤡3🤬1😭1

23 Jan 2025, 00:50 UTC≈5,950 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://solscan.io/account/Fj6nfGKniwaLujTyK2DKrkgNesubPY3n65oyyYUGVEgE#transfers $stonks just farmed 7 million. Worst part about crypto.

5😢3

10 Jan 2025, 17:08 UTC≈9,590 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/AiSommet77579 if you ever see a coin like this following all of grand. Just block it.

👍9🤣6😭31

9 Jan 2025, 17:17 UTC≈6,340 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

$Kikai seems like full farm stole @, retweeted a bunch of tweets to add depth to twitter, tweeted CA, got 40% on wallet and got out 560k

16👍7

9 Jan 2025, 17:15 UTC≈5,860 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/_pion/status/1877403426692255761

👍7

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @devwyd1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 466,198 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CALL CENTER” (@devwyd1), 2,429 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/devwyd1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.