Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

DevOps notes 📝

@devopsi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,205subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001678619412
TypeChannel
Username@devopsi
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/devopsi

Growth

1,2051,2071,2067 August 2026 — 1,206 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,206 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,207 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,205 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 3 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,205–1,207 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 22:531,205-2
8 Aug 2026, 05:561,207+1
7 Aug 2026, 23:171,206no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:531,206first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 18 February 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.6%
avg views ÷ 1,205 subscribers
Avg views / post
465
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026
Posts held19 (18 February 202425 July 2026)
Views total2,326
Reactions total9
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
43s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

109 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5247.7%
2422.0%
👍1614.7%
🤡43.67%
💯32.75%
🙏32.75%
🤣32.75%
🐳21.83%
👏10.917%
🤩10.917%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 109reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 February 2024 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
21
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 19 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @devopsi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 February 2024 to 25 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

25 Jul 2026, 09:06 UTC402 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Мои вторые любимые упряжки, у которых есть бесплатная триалка на месяц, без рефералки: 1. codex (openai) + chatgpt-desktop - нравится их голосовой агент, ну и это достойный конкурент claude даже в инженерных задачах. 2. agy (google) + gemini-desktop - их модели с 1м токенов, генерацию изображений и видео нравится делать тут

👍3

25 Jul 2026, 09:03 UTC372 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Главное не машина, а водитель (c) ВинДизель Человек как диспетчер (Human-in-the-Loop) — это самый главный «водитель», если смотреть на систему глобально. Три уровня в ИИ-авиации (от железа к человеку) Если применять harness-agnostic подход к агентным системам типа Claude/Codex, то получается не просто «машина и водитель», а целая система управления: 1. Машина (LLM + Harness) Это самолет или болид. Сама модель (Cla

🔥2👏1

16 Jul 2026, 16:25 UTC493 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Лучший в мире harness предложил win-win ситуацию для вас гайз, попробуете триалку, потом отмените 🎲

🤡3

9 Jul 2026, 03:53 UTC749 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Лайк если вы тоже спите с клодихой. Это видео было выкачено из инстаграм и загружено сюда в телегу через клауд-код 👮‍♀️ Links: • https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp - ytdlp выкачивает видосы/звук из многих соц. сеток • https://www.raycast.com/vimtor/video-downloader - raycast плагин над CLI, удобнее • https://my.telegram.org/apps - tg client side api ⏺ Понятно — видео в кодеке VP9, а QuickTime на macOS его не воспроизв

👍3🤣3

8 Jun 2026, 16:28 UTC≈1,240 views10 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Товарищи, есть тут мысля открыть новый ванильный сезон в канале. Как у вас дела? Уже всех AI агентов освоили? Подкину вам немного интерактивчика: посмотрите на схему и выберете свой уровень владения "AI". Ниже будет опросник apiVersion: devops/v5 kind: Documentation metadata: name: devops-notes labels: andrewhorbach.com/season: "5" andrewhorbach.com/ai: "true" Вэлкам в комментарии

🔥10

19 Sept 2025, 07:40 UTC≈6,050 views18 reactions11 Starsread 7 August 2026

Comrades, we've hit 1k members! 🎉Thank you for being here with me. I've never asked you for anything before, but I'm about to: premium subscribers, please boost this channel. It will help the channel grow.

10💯3🙏3🔥2

3 Sept 2025, 04:06 UTC≈6,330 views3 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

How to "watch" "Python: The Documentary" in 5 minutes (AI) https://andrewhorbach.com/blog/2025-09-03/ #### 🐍 The Birth of Python * **Guido van Rossum** created Python in 1989 during his Christmas holidays 🎄. * The language was conceived as a simpler and more accessible alternative to C and Shell, inspired by the **ABC** project. * The main feature inherited from ABC is the use of **indentation** for grouping code,

🔥3

27 Jul 2025, 05:45 UTC≈5,970 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇬🇧⛅ Read the article https://andrewhorbach.com/blog/2025-07-27/ to learn how to get $300 in AWS for free, but this is not financial advice. If this post gets 15 likes (asterisks are better), the next one will be out within a week. 🇷🇺⛅Читайте в статье https://andrewhorbach.com/blog/2025-07-27/, как бесплатно получить $300 в AWS, но это не является финансовой рекомендацией. Если этот пост наберет 15 лайков (лучше звез

🔥164🐳2👍1

5 Jun 2025, 05:06 UTC≈5,440 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🇬🇧 Kaniko R.I.P., Mitantis Docker is back P.S. Don’t have much time lately, let’s read ZVLB 🇷🇺 Kaniko R.I.P., Mitantis Docker вернулся! P.S. Времени в последнее время мало, давай почитаем ZVLB

👍21

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @devopsi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DevOps notes 📝” (@devopsi), 1,205 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/devopsi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.