Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Очко Дьявола

@devils_ass

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

5,584subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001223771656
TypeChannel
Username@devils_ass
Created26 August 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/devils_ass

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

8,450 average views per post against 5,584 subscribers — an engagement rate of 151.2%. Across the 87,934 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,163–9,999 subscribers — the middle half sit between 5.98% and 24.9%, with a median of 12.8%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (13 July 2026 12 August 2026)
Posts measured14 of 14 published in the window (0 exact, 14 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled118,230
Mature posts only151.2% over 14 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers5,584 measured 11 August 2026
Cohortb3162 · 87,934 channels · p10 2.49% · p25 5.98% · p50 12.8% · p75 24.9% · p90 42.8%
Position in cohort99.492th percentile · 11.8× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.036% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

5,5845,5985,5917 August 2026 — 5,598 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,598 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,597 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,584 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 3 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,582–5,600 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 04:055,584-13
7 Aug 2026, 21:575,597-1
7 Aug 2026, 20:005,598no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:495,598first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 1 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
151.2%
avg views ÷ 5,584 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,450
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (1 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total118,230
Reactions total1,649
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
626
Videos
176
Links
320

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
58s
Average length
58s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,044 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
66932.7%
🤬43521.3%
👍29614.5%
😢27313.4%
😁1597.78%
🤔643.13%
😱612.98%
👏542.64%
👎281.37%
🔥50.245%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,044reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @devils_ass. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC≈4,120 views83 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Окошки закрываем!!

🤬55😢17😱5👍3👎21

5 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC≈4,940 views210 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Суки ебаные. Мы шо тут открыли филиал "Скалы"? Кто из 3024 узнал своего бойца? Если вы не прекратите систематическое избиение и не вызовите ему скорую.... ждите нас и очко смазывайте. Особенно ротный(лицо не показываем спецом. Есть и фото и видео) Какой бы он там ни был - это не животное а тем более у него рак. Та в пизду все это ротный на букву п службы уже начинают работать

🤬161😢415👍2👎1

1 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC≈6,770 views104 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Слишком много негатива в последнее время. Вот вам повеселиться ☝🏻 Ну хоть что то должны эти обезьяны привносить в нашу Страну позитивного. А то толку от них нет не хрена.

😁5623👍16👎7🤔2

27 Jul 2026, 16:33 UTC≈9,300 views168 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://t.me/lachentyt/65762 Засвітилася наша "людина року"

🤬127😁16👎14👍65

24 Jul 2026, 08:07 UTC≈10,700 views67 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Другі пуски можуть бути наші. Тому увага

34😢26😱7

24 Jul 2026, 07:05 UTC≈9,320 views175 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Может пора уже высунуть голову из жопы и понять что вы уже рулите в прифронтовом городе?

135👏29🤬11

23 Jul 2026, 10:34 UTC≈8,540 views99 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Заправьтесь по возможности но не создавая ажиотаж. ‼️‼️‼️время есть и много ‼️‼️‼️ Только если вам действительно нужно топливо. Если не особо - то нехрен очереди создавать. Дефицита не будет. (НПЗ у нас нет). Всем удачи и будьте бдительны!!!

75👍16🤔7👎1

23 Jul 2026, 08:32 UTC≈7,240 views71 reactionsread 12 August 2026

☝🏻☝🏻☝🏻 актуально Не тіко сьогодні але і найближчим часом

32😢29🤬10

21 Jul 2026, 20:22 UTC≈13,800 views172 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Усіх вітаємо, завтра якщо є повітряна тривога, уникаємо цього квадрата ‼️‼️‼️‼️

😢113😱349🤔9👍7

21 Jul 2026, 15:55 UTC≈7,230 views262 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ну мы не могли пройти мимо нашего друга малели. Я смотрю маловато наша Альфа тебя помяла. Ты там опять балуешься? Ну ничего..... Злые языки поговаривают, что как только ты откупишься и выйдешь вот тут то и будет самое интересное. Как там? Сичеславская набережная? Спи в пол глаза сынок. А то так можно и пропустить дорогу на Бамбас. Прикинь? Прикол. Проснулся на Бамбасе 🤣🤣🤣. Мы слыхали истории про шахедов(только не

171👍46👏25😁20

20 Jul 2026, 08:08 UTC≈8,050 views112 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Дорогие подписчики, ситуация обостряется у нас в городе. В ближайшее время поменьше шарахайтесь по городу а особенно в сторону днепра. Не хотим разводить "зраду" и понимаем что городской власти похрен трафик в городе и как этот трафик будет проходить (ОПЗЖ сРУЛИТ). Но у нас вроде же есть военная администрация это все ляжет на ее плечи. Готовьтесь пожалуйста сейчас чтобы избежать коллапса в городе. Ска как же не хоче

62🤔37👍13

16 Jul 2026, 09:59 UTC≈9,320 views75 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Мляяя ну это все!!!! Поставить мусора???? Вы серьезно? Я шо проспал и очнулся в пид@растане???? 🤬

🤬60🤔8🔥5😁2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @devils_ass. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Jul 2026, 08:09 UTCAnonymous Poll792 voters

Що з позитивного ви відмітили у місті?(якщо нема то відмічаємо по приколу шось)

  1. Дороги13%
  2. Лавочки17%
  3. Зупинки9%
  4. Зрощування з "блатними"24%
  5. Пашкіна нова піцерія46%
  6. Антидроновий захист18%

The shares total 127%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Очко Дьявола” (@devils_ass), 5,584 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/devils_ass.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.