Возьмем еще пару моделей на этот офер 🫶 ⚡️ OFTV Цена $149/неделя. Как только слоты заканчиваются, мы возвращаемся к обычным условиям. Поэтому если давно смотрел на OFTV и откладывал “на потом” вот это самое “потом” сейчас. Связь тут: @devil_metrics 🙂

Channel
Devil Metrics 😈 Traffic OnlyFans | OFTV
@devil_metric
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,329subscribers
+19 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002186420922 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @devil_metric |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/devil_metric |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 2,329 | +11 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:36 | 2,318 | +8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 2,310 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 2,310 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 13 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 23s
- Average length
- 28s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
125 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5222217547994125753 | 36 | 28.8% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 18.4% | |
| custom 5348388457196559257 | 14 | 11.2% | |
| 🫡 | 14 | 11.2% | |
| 😈 | 8 | 6.40% | |
| 🦄 | 8 | 6.40% | |
| custom 5413393848078450873 | 7 | 5.60% | |
| ⚡ | 7 | 5.60% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 5.60% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.8% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 125reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 November 2025 to 12 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @devil_metric. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 November 2025 to 12 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Пока OFTV трафик хоронили, мы продолжали его вертеть для вас ❤️ Напоминаем: он никуда не сдулся, и сейчас очень хорошее время, чтобы в него залететь. Поэтому открываем несколько мест на ведение по специальной цене. ⚡️ $149 в неделю вместо стандартного тарифа. Да-да, ты не ослышался. Всего $149. Таких цен у нас ещё не было, и вряд ли это повторится, поэтому не теряйся. Мест немного (не байт) Обсудить условия тут: …
👍4🔥3custom 52222175479941257533
😐 Дружеское напоминание, у нас открылись новые слоты на ведение АИ трафика с автопубликацией через фермы смартфонов для ваших моделек, за подробностями сюда: @devil_metrics _ P.S на скрине кейс как сейчас показывает себя этот источник в связке с reels 😊
custom 52222175479941257533👍2🔥2
🍑 PusyPower.cc - наконец-то запускаем. Что это даёт проект: • АИ генерация контента без артефактов с ручной проверкой наших модераторов • модель вообще не участвует в производстве контента, все делается на автопилоте • автоматическая выкладка на сетку аккаунтов • уникализация контента Для первых 5 клиентов: 🔥 бонус при старте 🔥 +3 бесплатных аккаунта при ведении от 10 аккаунтов НО: это закрытый запуск, и возьм…
Во всех тгк одно и тоже: «мы отсутствовали, потому что готовили для вас что то незабываемое» Бл*ть мы тоже вообще то, но теперь надо перфоманс какой то сделать когда выкатим что то интересное. У нас релиз новой еб**утой связки намечен на следующую неделю, сейчас мы жестко тестим ее по всем фронтам и как только поймем что готовы, сразу отдадим в массу, это не байт но постарайся следить за новостями на следующей неде…
🫡9custom 52222175479941257533
Ну что траферы, на сколько знакома эта глава? 😂 Гарри Потер и узник онлифанс
😈6🦄4custom 52222175479941257533
Набрали, пока что стоп 🐱
Ой что мы вам приготовили. Возьмем 10 страниц по ревшере (оплата процента с продаж) 👍 От тебя: Доступ от страницы и продажи РАБОТАЮЩИЙ ОТДЕЛ ПРОДАЖ. 👍 От нас: Трафик Без лишних слов, если актуально то в директ бегом бегом бегом @devil_metrics Только давайте без пустой болтовни, если у вас продажников нету или просто поболтать то лучше не надо, я тут сильно в запаре бьюсь 🤡 Завтра пост удалим, всех обнял приподн…
Этот канал захвачен ИИ. Автор на Гавайях курит бамбук, а нейросеть за него строчит посты, чтобы налить тебе побольше воды в ленту. Ладно, расслабься, нихера подобного. 🤗 Ведение ТГ я машине не отдам, чтобы у тебя не пропала ниточка связи с реальным OFM-миром. А вообще по сути, гайс, каждый уже построил себе кеш-машину для генерации мани в кармане? Ведь нюансов у AI моделей на самом деле ничуть не меньше, чем у ре…
🔥4custom 52222175479941257533custom 53483884571965592572
Моя стори о том, как меня зае*л нормальный белый бизнес. Давно тут ничего не было. Подумал, неплохо будет залететь к вам с постом знакомства, ибо много новых к нам залетело 🫂 Начнём. 4 года назад у меня было своё маркетинговое агентство, ахуенный офис, высокая ежемесячная оборотка 😼 10 человек в команде. Процессы, KPI, планёрки. Со стороны — всё правильно. Всё “нормально”. А внутри — ощущение, что я делаю что-то…
🔥10custom 52222175479941257535⚡3custom 53483884571965592573
OFTV - Плохие и хорошие новости актуальны на 26 февраля 👇 1️⃣ Самые частые причины отказа в апруве профайла сейчас: нет англа и подача без раскачанных соцсетей. Если нужна проходка с 99% шанса, готовь анкету и страницу так, чтобы ВСЕ блистало. И тратьте ресурс на тех моделей, у кого реально высокий шанс апрува. Можем заранее разобрать модель перед стартом и сказать, есть смысл подаваться или нет. ⸻ 2️⃣ Отрубило т…
🫡3custom 52222175479941257533⚡2custom 53483884571965592572😈1
Поздравляем победителя новогоднего конкурса 😏 @Ksenia_Broker_BA
🫡2custom 52222175479941257532🦄1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @devil_metric. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,134,303 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@devil_metric named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Devil Metrics 😈 Traffic OnlyFans | OFTV” (@devil_metric), 2,329 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/devil_metric.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.