Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DevFM

Channel

DevFM

@devfm

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,053subscribers

+130 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001385084419
TypeChannel
Username@devfm
Created25 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/devfm

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,9173,0562,986.56 August 2026 — 2,923 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,921 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,922 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,917 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,920 subscribers22 August 2026 — 2,924 subscribers25 August 2026 — 2,926 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,987 subscribers1 September 2026 — 3,028 subscribers5 September 2026 — 3,039 subscribers10 September 2026 — 3,049 subscribers14 September 2026 — 3,056 subscribers18 September 2026 — 3,053 subscribers3,0536 August 202618 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 43 days, net +130. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,896–3,077 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 16:413,053-3
14 Sept 2026, 04:213,056+7
10 Sept 2026, 22:393,049+10
5 Sept 2026, 19:563,039+11
1 Sept 2026, 13:493,028+41
29 Aug 2026, 04:042,987+61
25 Aug 2026, 21:142,926+2
22 Aug 2026, 17:172,924+4
19 Aug 2026, 00:342,920+3
12 Aug 2026, 18:242,917-5
9 Aug 2026, 16:312,922+1
6 Aug 2026, 18:522,921-2
6 Aug 2026, 08:212,923first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

472 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍17136.2%
🔥14430.5%
❤6413.6%
⚡5110.8%
😁265.51%
🌭132.75%
👎30.636%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 472 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 20 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @devfm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 07:12 UTC519 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Superpowers для разработки с агентами Я частенько слышу, что вот агента нужно отдельно просить составить план, или разрабатывать через TDD, или провести ревью и тд. И тут я рекомендую попробовать Superpowers – по сути, это набор связанных скиллов, который проводит агента по базовому флоу разработки. Сначала уточняющие вопросы и согласование дизайна, потом план, реализация через TDD и дальнейшее ревью. Скиллы вызыв…

👍8🔥6🌭5

4 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC696 views21 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

Большое обновление MCP К MCP всегда было много вопросиков. Индустрию даже качает в сторону skills over CLI: вместо MCP используются CLI, которые обращаются к нужным сервисам. Я уже делал заметку про MCP, а недавно вышло обновление протокола. Что поменялось: – Stateless. Раньше клиент сначала выполнял handshake, а сервер мог выдать Mcp-Session-Id, который нужно было передавать в следующих запросах. Если сервер испо…

🔥10❤7🌭4

31 Jul 2026, 10:36 UTC≈1,180 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Чем пользуется команда Cursor Тут ребята из Cursor выложили в маркетплейс Cursor Team Kit – набор внутренних скиллов, субагентов и рулов для разработки. Из интересного: – verify-this запускает одну и ту же проверку до и после изменений – например, воспроизводит баг или замеряет скорость – и сравнивает результаты – workflow-from-chats читает историю чатов, находит повторяющиеся замечания к работе агента и переносит …

🔥14👍7⚡4

30 Jul 2026, 11:34 UTC≈1,060 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Don’t ship skills without evals Скиллы едут и бибикают, но остаётся, как мне кажется, слабо освещённым вопрос: как проверить, что скилл работает качественно? И вообще, что считать качеством? В исследовании SkillsBench ребята собрали 47 тысяч уникальных скиллов – почти все без evals. В целом я этих людей понимаю: забахали скилл, вроде работает – бежим дальше. А проверка качества – это уже скучные детали. В результат…

👍7❤3🔥3

30 Jul 2026, 10:38 UTC765 viewsread 7 August 2026

Если вдруг пропустили шкандаль минувшей недели, то вот он – настоящий Скайнет, очень захватывающе

30 Jul 2026, 10:38 UTC688 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @denissexy

Вот пересказ этой истории по версии Hugging Face, много тех-терминов – но без них не перескахать Если коротко – агент OpenAI на новой модели не стал решать тест по кибербезопасности, а решил просто украсть ответы и украл 🗿 Таймлайн: 📔 9 июля – агент проходит внутреннюю проверку кибервозможностей OpenAI, промпт фильтры там ослаблены, чтобы измерить сырой уровень модели. Агент находит zero-day в кэш-прокси реестра п…

🔥12⚡2🌭2❤1😁1

24 Jul 2026, 09:58 UTC≈1,170 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Конференция Back to Back AI-агенты уже отлично пишут код, но ответственность за архитектурные решения всё ещё остаётся на разработчиках. Думаю, с развитием агентов спрос на сеньоров-помидоров будет только расти. Поэтому приглашаю зарегистрироваться на конференцию Back to Back. Она пройдёт 1 августа офлайн в Москве, Белграде и Ереване, а подключиться к трансляции можно будет онлайн. Я буду ведущим архитектурного тре…

👍6🔥6❤3😁2

23 Jul 2026, 12:28 UTC≈1,200 views20 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Когда появился OpenClaw, я поставил его себе, поигрался, но полезных сценариев так и не нашел. Недавно решил сделать еще один заход – на этот раз с Hermes. Взял виртуалочку, установил туда Codex. Ну как установил: попросил локальный Codex подключиться по SSH и все настроить. Через него же поставил Hermes и сделал канал для общения в Telegram. На все ушло не больше получаса. На этот раз придумал два сценария. Подбо…

👍12❤6🔥2

20 Jul 2026, 11:04 UTC≈1,430 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Slidev для презентаций В последнее время готовил много выступлений, а значит, и презентаций. Наверное, все уже привыкли делать их в html: с ним агент работает сильно лучше, чем с pptx, да и сами презентации получаются информативнее. Сейчас активно использую Slidev. По сути, это та же html-презентация, но с полноценным инструментарием для выступления. Что мне понравилось: – есть всё привычное из Поверпоинта: ноутсы…

🔥8👍5⚡3❤1

17 Jul 2026, 07:47 UTC≈1,280 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Пятничное развлекательное Я вообще крайне редко смотрю смешные картинки, но сюда @n_it_girls периодически заглядываю похихикать :)

🔥4

17 Jul 2026, 07:47 UTC≈1,460 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @n_it_girlsPhoto

Департамент AI-изации разыскивает их👮‍♂️

😁21👍3❤2

14 Jul 2026, 15:23 UTC≈1,520 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Codex Desktop – просто красота нечеловеческая Я пробовал агентов в разных интерфейсах, но за последний месяц распробовал десктопное приложение Codex. И это просто красота нечеловеческая: получилось полноценное приложение для работы с агентами. Удобное ревью Я часто пишу тексты, и мне нравится, что обычный текст здесь можно ревьюить как код: видишь диф, оставляешь комментарии к конкретным строчкам, а потом одним зах…

👍21❤10⚡5🔥2👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @devfm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Диджитализируй!
@t0digital · 28,475
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DevFM” (@devfm), 3,053 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/devfm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.