i would like to express my appreciation and give due credit to @oikw4 for the developer commands i have shared with you. thank you, @oikw4, for your valuable input. 😏👍
❤2

Channel
@developercmds
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
39subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002036703016 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @developercmds |
| Created | 24 November 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/developercmds |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 08:56 | 39 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 40 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:49 | 40 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 24 November 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 December 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
25 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 19 | 76.0% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 20.0% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 4.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 24 November 2023 to 25 December 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
i would like to express my appreciation and give due credit to @oikw4 for the developer commands i have shared with you. thank you, @oikw4, for your valuable input. 😏👍
❤2
500 followers for part3?🥹 www.instagram.com/syed.musaib10/ >>>> @developercmds
developer commands part3 ⁉️🫶 ( 220 votes ).
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
big shoutout to everyone who got me to 250+ followers on instagram! 🫶❤️ part 2 of developer commands dropping now, and im already dreaming of that 500+ for part3. thanks a ton, and if you hit that follow button, you're my hero! here's the part2: https://telegra.ph/developer-settings-guide-Part-2-12-09 ⁉️🥹 must follow for part3: www.instagram.com/syed.musaib10/ 🫠❤️🩹 join for more: @developercmds 😏
❤4
Signed syed musaib.
the part2 of the commands is almost ready, if no problems are found, it will be released within 24-36 hours. stay blessed and tuned. @developercmds 🫶🏾⁉️
🔥5
Signed syed musaib.
developer commands part2 🫶🏾⁉️
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed 🧃
got part 2 in the making, but i was thinking of dropping it. though i haven't hit 250 on my instagram yet. let's hit that mark, and i'll share the goods! ⁉️🫶🏾 instagram: instagram.com/syed.musaib10 🫡 @developercmds : 'stay tuned' edit: already hit 250, thankyou all ❤️❤️
❤6
Signed 🧃
hey everyone, got lots of messages asking for the commands, so i'm sharing them here. i trust you all to follow me on instagram. please don't let me down. 🥹 Once we hit 250-300 followers, i'll drop part two (already in the works). thanks for being supportive 🫶 lots of love @syedmusaib10 follow on instagram 🥰 dev commands : https://telegra.ph/developer-settings-guide-Part-1-11-24 📸
❤4😍1
Signed 🧃
do 250 followers and i'd share it here. 🦖💗 (i'd give a follow back too 🫡) instagram.com/syed.musaib10
❤3
Signed 🧃
Channel created
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @developercmds. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
developer commands part3 ⁉️🫶 ( 220 votes ).
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
developer commands part2 🫶🏾⁉️
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 24 November 2023 to 25 December 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
@developercmds named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DEVELOPER COMMANDS” (@developercmds), 39 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/developercmds.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.