Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for devcolibri

Channel

devcolibri

@devcolibri_com

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

623subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002814508527
TypeChannel
Username@devcolibri_com
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/devcolibri_com

Growth

620623621.56 August 2026 — 620 subscribers7 August 2026 — 620 subscribers15 August 2026 — 623 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 620–623 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 01:18623+3
7 Aug 2026, 15:06620no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:03620first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
143.7%
avg views ÷ 623 subscribers
Avg views / post
895
1 post measured
Reaction rate
4.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held20 (22 December 202524 July 2026)
Views total895
Reactions total37
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 23:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

462 reactions across 15 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥29363.4%
9420.3%
🎉326.93%
👍173.68%
🆒71.52%
😢71.52%
🤯51.08%
👏30.649%
🤝20.433%
❤‍🔥10.216%
🙏10.216%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 462reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 December 2025 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 20 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @devcolibri_com. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 December 2025 to 24 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 07:56 UTC895 views37 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет! В курсе Gradle был опубликован новый раздел "Управление зависимостями" 🔥 Если предыдущие уроки уже прошли, то можно продолжать обучение. Welcome) P.S. напоминаю, что до момента полного завершения курса на него установлена минимальная цена, можно приобрести сейчас, а новые разделы будут доступны автоматически после их публикации🏃🏻‍➡️

🔥333🙏1

11 Jul 2026, 10:29 UTC≈3,230 views71 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет! Новости) Курс Gradle опубликован и доступен для прохождения🔥 Важные моменты: 1. Курс ещё не завершен, вышла небольшая часть, чтобы вы уже могли начинать обучение. Уроков записано уже очень много, в процессе монтажа, по мере готовности буду публиковать. Ориентировочный срок завершения курса - 31.08.2026 2. До момента завершения курса на него будет установлена минимальная цена. Можно зарегистрироваться

🔥548🤯5🎉3👍1

29 Jun 2026, 10:46 UTC≈1,120 views83 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет! Новости по курсу Gradle🔥 Курс находится в активной разработке, записано очень много уроков, большая часть еще монтируется. В общем будет много интересного💥 По срокам - писал, что часть будет опубликована в июне, но после проверки обнаружилось несколько косяков, оперативно исправляем, но до конца июня не успеем, поэтому ориентировочные сроки следующие: 30% курса будет опубликовано в начале июля 100% ку

🔥5714🎉8👏3❤‍🔥1

28 May 2026, 19:26 UTC≈1,170 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет! По просьбе Stepik пишу, что у них стартовали большие распродажи, не только моих курсов, но вообще очень многих по разным темам, welcome) P.S. по моим курсам максимальные скидки можно найти тут https://t.me/devcolibri_com/5

🔥112

10 Apr 2026, 13:34 UTC≈1,420 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Poll

❓Какой будет результат работы программы?

  1. John34%
  2. Alex36%
  3. Bob30%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥143👍1

25 Mar 2026, 07:24 UTC≈1,270 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Poll

❓Какой будет результат работы программы?

  1. Loaded17%
  2. null41%
  3. Ошибка компиляции: private set запрещает запись из другого потока42%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥12👍5

25 Mar 2026, 07:24 UTC≈1,130 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

❗️Новый формат - что не так с кодом? До этого задания были только из разряда "что будет выведено в консоль?" Но на собеседованиях и в реальной работе важно увидеть "что не так с кодом?" Ответьте на простой тест, а затем в комментариях пришлите свой вариант: что на ваш взгляд не так с кодом и/или свой вариант решения задачи (их много) class ViewModel { var data: String? = null private set g

👍1

4 Mar 2026, 16:18 UTC≈1,230 views16 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026
Poll

❓Какой будет результат работы программы?

  1. method from B methodA40%
  2. method from A methodA10%
  3. ошибка компиляции39%
  4. ошибка в runtime11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥16

16 Feb 2026, 11:39 UTC≈1,250 views28 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

🔥 fastForEach в Kotlin Обычный forEach{} В Kotlin цикл forEach задуман универсальным и должен работать с любой коллекцией. У разных коллекций разная внутренняя структура. У одних есть доступ по индексу (get(i)), у других - нет. Поэтому универсальный способ обхода - через интерфейс Iterator. Коллекция реализует его, чтобы обеспечить общий механизм перебора элементов. Именно на основе итератора работает обычный forEa

14👍8🔥6

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @devcolibri_com. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Apr 2026, 13:34 UTCAnonymous Quiz299 voters

❓Какой будет результат работы программы?

  1. John34%
  2. Alex36%
  3. Bob30%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Mar 2026, 07:24 UTCAnonymous Quiz183 voters

❓Какой будет результат работы программы?

  1. Loaded17%
  2. null41%
  3. Ошибка компиляции: private set запрещает запись из другого потока42%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Mar 2026, 16:18 UTCAnonymous Quiz240 voters

❓Какой будет результат работы программы?

  1. method from B methodA40%
  2. method from A methodA10%
  3. ошибка компиляции39%
  4. ошибка в runtime11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Feb 2026, 15:25 UTCAnonymous Quiz296 voters

❓Какой будет результат работы программы?

  1. 1 ..Runtime Exception25%
  2. 1 2 ..Runtime Exception11%
  3. Compilation Error12%
  4. 12315%
  5. 123431%
  6. 14231%
  7. 12434%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

23 Jan 2026, 12:43 UTCAnonymous Quiz272 voters

❓Какой будет результат работы программы?

  1. 129%
  2. 1X38%
  3. 12X8%
  4. 13X21%
  5. 123X4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Dec 2025, 10:43 UTCAnonymous Quiz185 voters

❓Какой будет результат работы программы?

  1. init a b19%
  2. a init b a b8%
  3. init a b a b9%
  4. a a init b b11%
  5. init a a b b51%
  6. a a b b init1%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 December 2025 to 24 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 208,008 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“devcolibri” (@devcolibri_com), 623 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/devcolibri_com.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.