Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Dev's Calls

@devcabal

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

18,716subscribers

+357 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001562371080
TypeChannel
Username@devcabal
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/devcabal

Growth

18,35918,71618,537.57 August 2026 — 18,359 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,359 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,398 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,450 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,534 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,589 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,652 subscribers13 August 2026 — 18,716 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net +357. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,305–18,770 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:5418,716+64
12 Aug 2026, 00:4218,652+63
10 Aug 2026, 21:3618,589+55
9 Aug 2026, 23:3718,534+84
9 Aug 2026, 02:2118,450+52
8 Aug 2026, 04:1718,398+39
7 Aug 2026, 11:0018,359no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:5718,359first reading

Engagement

146 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.07%
avg views ÷ 18,716 subscribers
Avg views / post
387
146 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
146
of 146 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held146 (6 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total56,468
Reactions total2,345
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 00:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,345 reactions across 146 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
81334.7%
👍77633.1%
🔥69629.7%
🎉351.49%
💯80.341%
🫡70.299%
🍾50.213%
🏆50.213%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 146 of the 146 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,345reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 146 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 20:06 UTC164 views14 reactionsread 13 August 2026

GUYS THIS IS FUCKING SENDING HOLY SHIT

🔥64👍3🍾1

12 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC175 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Guys i don’t think you understand how huge this fucking is!

5👍5🔥2

12 Aug 2026, 20:04 UTC165 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Adding more here, reversal is here!!

4👍4🔥4

12 Aug 2026, 20:04 UTC164 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026

My personal goals are 50-100x from this entry

4👍4🔥3

12 Aug 2026, 20:04 UTC161 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Very good entry here, adding more here before the next leg up🔥

5👍4🔥2

12 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTC159 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Chart looks very good, looks ready for next leg up to a new ATH🚀

🔥72👍2

12 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTC160 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026

I think this can hit dex top 3 trending by end of the day

👍4🔥43

12 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTC159 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Team is getting DEX and Trending rn

👍4🔥43

Showing the 12 most recent of 146 posts we hold for @devcabal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 865,690 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dev's Calls” (@devcabal), 18,716 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/devcabal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.