Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for не gymgirl

Channel

не gymgirl

@dev7ex

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,803subscribers

+24 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003085898773
TypeChannel
Username@dev7ex
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dev7ex

Growth

4,7794,8234,8017 August 2026 — 4,779 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,779 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,787 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,823 subscribers18 August 2026 — 4,806 subscribers21 August 2026 — 4,796 subscribers24 August 2026 — 4,812 subscribers27 August 2026 — 4,807 subscribers30 August 2026 — 4,803 subscribers4,8037 August 202630 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 23 days, net +24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,772–4,830 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 17:394,803-4
27 Aug 2026, 15:174,807-5
24 Aug 2026, 17:434,812+16
21 Aug 2026, 07:154,796-10
18 Aug 2026, 01:524,806-17
14 Aug 2026, 20:584,823+36
11 Aug 2026, 01:564,787+8
7 Aug 2026, 14:024,779no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:514,779first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
52.4%
avg views ÷ 4,803 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,520
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held16 (24 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total15,090
Reactions total215
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 06:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
23s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

694 reactions across 14 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 539102688676153046664492.8%
custom 5366362405704066091507.20%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 694 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
138
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 16 we hold a reading for · 50%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dev7ex. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 09:31 UTC≈1,250 viewsread 12 August 2026

за индивидуальными тренировочными планами (разборами питания в том числе) можете обращаться ко мне по этому юзу: @hell1it

5 Aug 2026, 09:24 UTC≈3,660 views45 reactions10 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ЕДА — ДРУГ, А НЕ ВРАГ признавайтесь, кто устал от постоянных ограничений и бесконечных срывов? где ты ешь один рис с куриной грудкой, а вес стоит. в итоге за всем этим следуют только срывы и разочарование. кому знакомо? давайте договоримся раз и навсегда: голодание = стресс для организма. тело в панике включает «эконом-режим» и запасает жир даже от воздуха и здесь нужен баланс, а не крайности. разрушаем главные ми

custom 539102688676153046645

3 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC≈3,050 views71 reactions32 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

некоторые хотят обсудить мой «гиперлордоз» из-за которого у меня якобы и выглядят так хорошо ягодицы. скажу честно, мне хочется плакать от того насколько люди ленивы и бессовестны, потому что в 99% случаях такое пишут те, кто бросил, потому что у них что-то не получилось, а значит и у других не может получиться.

custom 539102688676153046671

3 Aug 2026, 10:14 UTC≈2,970 views71 reactions50 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

эра моего сухого пресса прошла

custom 539102688676153046671

3 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTC≈2,880 views28 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

сегодня хочу с вами обсудить тему страхов в зале. очень часто девушки пишут мне с просьбой поделиться собственным опытом моего начала, как я переборола в себе чувство, что все вокруг на тебя смотрят. я помню свои первые занятия как сейчас. приходила в оверсайзе, чтобы никто не осудил меня за мою форму, вставала на беговую дорожку и ходила просто для вида, чтобы хоть что-то делать, лишь бы не брать в руки гантели. и

custom 539102688676153046628

31 Jul 2026, 18:06 UTC≈3,290 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026

кружки в тг врут, я в жизни больше 😟

custom 539102688676153046634

31 Jul 2026, 18:06 UTC≈3,300 views51 reactions10 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 539102688676153046651

31 Jul 2026, 16:49 UTC≈3,360 views59 reactions11 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

это что моя рука 😳

custom 539102688676153046659

30 Jul 2026, 21:39 UTC≈3,700 views86 reactions22 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

дроп 🐈‍⬛

custom 539102688676153046686

28 Jul 2026, 18:01 UTC≈3,610 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

второй бан за неделю, в очередной раз по какой-то ерунде. я так понимаю тик ток против меня топит 😊

custom 539102688676153046640

28 Jul 2026, 17:30 UTC≈3,490 views48 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

сегодня пост под названием угадай что выдам что изменилось? 👨🏽‍💻

custom 539102688676153046648

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @dev7ex. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“не gymgirl” (@dev7ex), 4,803 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dev7ex.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.