3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 785–786 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 23:44
785
-1
8 Aug 2026, 01:46
786
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:16
786
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
83.3%
avg views ÷ 785 subscribers
Avg views / post
654
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.841%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held
19 (6 July 2026 – 27 July 2026)
Views total
3,924
Reactions total
33
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 01:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 50s
Average length
48s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
108 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
49
45.4%
👏
19
17.6%
🔥
17
15.7%
👍
12
11.1%
🤩
6
5.56%
🎉
2
1.85%
🏆
2
1.85%
❤🔥
1
0.926%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 108reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📢 Grant natijalari e'lon qilindi!
DeutschSmart School Sergeli filialida o'tkazilgan grant imtihoni natijalari tayyor.
Natijalar bo'yicha batafsil bilish uchun ota-onalar maktabga tashrif buyurishlari so'raladi.
Barcha ishtirokchilarni tabriklaymiz va yangi o'quv yilida ularga ulkan muvaffaqiyatlar tilaymiz.
- Lokatsiya: Yashnobod filiali
- Lokatsiya: Sergeli filiali
——————————————
📢 Результаты грантового экзамена…
📢 Hurmatli ota-onalar!
Dam olish kuni bo‘lishiga qaramay, sizga yanada qulaylik yaratish maqsadida ertaga yakshanba kuni DeutschSmart Schoolning Yashnobod va Sergeli filiallari faoliyat olib boradi.
Agar hafta davomida vaqtingiz bo‘lmagan bo‘lsa, maktab bilan yaqindan tanishishingiz, qabul va ro‘yxatdan o‘tish jarayonini yakunlashingiz, o‘zingizni qiziqtirgan barcha savollarga javob olishingiz mumkin.
-Lokatsiya: …
Bugun Deutsch Smart School Sergeli filialida 5–11-sinf o‘quvchilari uchun grant imtihoni muvaffaqiyatli o'tkazildi.
————————————
Сегодня в филиале Deutsch Smart School в Сергели успешно состоялся грантовый экзамен для учащихся 5–11 классов.
☎️ Aloqa markazi: +998550550444
Telegram | Instagram | Facebook | Youtube | Website
📢 Grant natijalari e'lon qilindi!
DeutschSmart Schoolning Yashnobod (Do‘stlik) filialida o'tkazilgan grant imtihoni natijalari e'lon qilindi.
Grant natijasini bilish uchun ota-onalar maktabga tashrif buyurishlari so‘raladi.
25-iyulga qadar grant yutgan o'quvchilarning ota-onalari maktabga kelib, ta'lim shartnomasini imzolashlari mumkin.
Diqqat! Sergeli filialiga grant dasturi bo'yicha ro'yxatdan o'tishning bugun …
DeutschSmart Schoolning Yashnobod filialida 5–11-sinf o‘quvchilari uchun grant imtihoni bo‘lib o‘tdi.
Endi navbat — Sergeli filialiga.
Sergeli filialiga 2026–2027 o‘quv yili uchun grant imtihonlariga arizalar qabuli davom etmoqda. Ro‘yxatdan o‘tish 22-iyulga qadar maktabning rasmiy sayti orqali amalga oshiriladi.
——————————
В филиале школы DeutschSmart в районе Яшнабад состоялся экзамен на получение грант для учени…
📢 Sergeli, Yangihayot va Zangiota tumanida yashovchi ota-onalar diqqatiga.
🇩🇪 Sergeli tumanida nemis tiliga ixtisoslashgan zamonaviy maktab — Deutsch Smart School o‘z faoliyatini boshlamoqda.
💸 Avgust oyiga qadar o‘qish narxi atigi 3,5 million so‘m.
🔖 Bu narx ichiga nemis va xorijlik ustozlar bilan darslar, kuniga 3 mahal issiq ovqat, soat 08:30 dan 17:00 gacha ta'lim va rivojlantiruvchi mashg‘ulotlar, IT va robot…
Ertaga soat 9:00 dan 11:00ga qadar jonli efir bo‘lib o‘tadi!
Siz jonli efirda barcha savollaringizga javob topishingiz mumkin 😊
👍6🔥2🤩2🎉1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @deutschsmart_school. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 27 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 354,117 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DeutschSmart School in Tashkent | 🇩🇪” (@deutschsmart_school), 785 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/deutschsmart_school.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.