Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Dethscript

@dethscript

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

1,406subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002157670582
TypeChannel
Username@dethscript
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dethscript

Growth

1,4061,4071,406.57 August 2026 — 1,407 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,407 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,406 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,406–1,407 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 21:151,406-1
7 Aug 2026, 22:161,407no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:241,407first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 2 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

2,972 reactions across 15 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,37546.3%
❤‍🔥72724.5%
🔥38813.1%
🕊1464.91%
🍓1284.31%
🥰451.51%
🍾351.18%
💘331.11%
💋190.639%
🌭150.505%
👎110.37%
🐳100.336%
80.269%
👍70.236%
🤗70.236%
😎50.168%
🎉30.101%
🌚20.067%
🤩20.067%
🏆10.034%
5 further kinds50.168%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,972reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 2 February 2026 to 30 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
162
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 15 we hold a reading for · 40%
Most on one post
110
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dethscript. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 February 2026 to 30 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Jun 2026, 08:29 UTC855 views72 reactionsread 7 August 2026

всем привет есть кто из иркутска? я к вам собираюсь 🙂

61🕊6💘5

7 May 2026, 11:47 UTC≈2,280 views294 reactions110 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Подарок за поддержку для @lisabop

❤‍🔥19664🔥28👎3🍓1💘1🕊1

26 Apr 2026, 12:34 UTC≈3,190 views376 reactions10 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Зато я точно знаю, что Калипсо выведет из артблока… 🩶

🔥245🍓63🥰4119❤‍🔥4🕊2🍾1👎1

26 Apr 2026, 11:50 UTC≈2,050 views82 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

53🌭158🐳3🤩2🤓1

21 Apr 2026, 10:26 UTC≈2,410 views338 reactions15 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Картинка для Orca Owl

217🔥74❤‍🔥42💘3🍓1🕊1

11 Apr 2026, 13:30 UTC≈2,490 views310 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⭐️

208❤‍🔥57🔥36🍓5👎2🕊2

29 Mar 2026, 11:10 UTC≈2,690 views227 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Референс для Orca Owl 🌸

❤‍🔥14056🍓21👎4🍾2🔥2🕊2

26 Feb 2026, 13:44 UTC≈4,610 views88 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🕊73🐳76🍾1👎1

9 Feb 2026, 03:13 UTC≈3,730 views191 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @iloveclownsPhoto

небольшой презент на день рождения для @dethscript

138🕊33❤‍🔥17🥰3

8 Feb 2026, 14:09 UTC≈2,470 views176 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @navernyakasluchitsyaPhoto

для дорогой dethscript 𝄃𝄂𝄂𝄀𝄁𝄃𝄂𝄂𝄃

❤‍🔥11045🕊14😎5🏆1💘1

7 Feb 2026, 14:51 UTC≈2,370 views122 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Deakonnn_archivePhoto

С днём рождения @dethscript!!

90💘18🕊12❤‍🔥2

7 Feb 2026, 13:43 UTC≈7,350 views285 reactions17 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

У меня сегодня День рождения! Спасибо всем Вам за поддержку, очень постараюсь рисовать картинки почаще 🩶

176❤‍🔥59🍓36🍾4🎉3💘3🌚2🤗1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @dethscript. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dethscript” (@dethscript), 1,406 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dethscript.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.