Video, posted without a caption
🤩2

Channel
@descartesss
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
17subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001760776324 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @descartesss |
| Description | «Зᴀᴋᴧючиᴧ дᴏᴦᴏʙᴏᴩ – ᴄᴏбᴧюдᴀй ᴇᴦᴏ Любую ᴄдᴇᴧᴋу нᴀдᴏ уʙᴀжᴀᴛь» ➤ @descartesssbot — ᴨᴏ ʙᴄᴇʍ ʙᴏᴨᴩᴏᴄᴀʍ. ➤ 𝙈𝘼𝙍𝙍𝙄𝘼𝙂𝙀 — ➤ 𝙋𝘼𝙍𝙀𝙉𝙏𝙎 — |
| Created | 20 February 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/descartesss |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 17 | no change |
| 15 Aug 2026, 12:05 | 17 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 20 February 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
51 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 26 | 51.0% | |
| 🤩 | 11 | 21.6% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 15.7% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 9.80% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.96% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 20 February 2022 to 7 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video, posted without a caption
🤩2
тут никого нет.
❤1🤩1
давайте я вам пока вкину кое-что старое)
❤1🤩1
ну это мы можем, но оформа то уже частично сделана)
🤩2❤1
щас напишем, а потом опять через два года вернемся.
🤩2❤1
мы пранкеры, да, но в этот раз без пранка. мы готовим настоящее новое оформление и возвращение спустя два года )
❤1🤩1
ʙᴄᴇʍ дᴏбᴩый ʙᴇчᴇᴩ, ʍы ʙᴇᴩнуᴧиᴄь ᴄ ᴧучɯиʍи нᴏʙᴏᴄᴛяʍи! ᴄ ᴄᴇᴦᴏдняɯнᴇᴦᴏ дня Дᴇᴋᴀᴩᴛы ᴄнᴏʙᴀ ᴏᴛᴋᴩыᴛы! ʍы ᴩᴀды ᴨᴩиʙᴇᴛᴄᴛʙᴏʙᴀᴛь ʙᴀᴄ, и ждᴇʍ ʙᴄᴇх ᴄᴛᴀᴩичᴋᴏʙ и нᴏʙᴇньᴋих!! ᴄ уʙᴀжᴇниᴇʍ, ᴀдʍиниᴄᴛᴩᴀция Дᴇᴋᴀᴩᴛ ᴨᴩᴏɯᴧыᴇ ᴨубᴧиᴋᴀции ᴀᴋᴛуᴀᴧьны #𝘿𝙀𝙎𝘾𝘼𝙍𝙏𝙀𝙎ᶦᶰᶠ #𝘿𝙀𝙎𝘾𝘼𝙍𝙏𝙀𝙎ᴿᴾ
Signed Kitty
дᴀʍы и ᴦᴏᴄᴨᴏдᴀ! ᴨᴏчᴛи ᴄᴨуᴄᴛя ᴦᴏд ʍы ᴩᴇɯиᴧи ʙᴇᴩнуᴛьᴄя! ϶ᴛᴏ быᴧᴏ дᴏᴧᴦиʍ и нᴇᴨᴩᴏᴄᴛыʍ ᴩᴇɯᴇниᴇʍ дᴧя нᴀᴄ ᴄ Кᴩиᴄᴏʍ. ʙ ᴄᴋᴏᴩᴏʍ ʙᴩᴇʍᴇни ʍы ʙᴇᴩнᴇʍᴄя ᴄ нᴏʙыʍ ᴏɸᴏᴩʍᴧᴇниᴇʍ и нᴏʙыʍи ᴄиᴧᴀʍи. DESCARTES - нᴇ ᴨᴩᴏᴄᴛᴏ ᴋᴧᴀн, ᴀ ᴄᴇʍья, ᴋᴏᴛᴏᴩᴀя нᴀʙᴄᴇᴦдᴀ ʙ нᴀɯих ᴄᴇᴩдцᴀх, и ᴄᴇйчᴀᴄ ᴨᴩиɯᴧᴏ ᴇᴇ ʙᴩᴇʍя ᴄияᴛь. ᴨᴏ ʙᴄᴇʍ ʙᴏᴨᴩᴏᴄᴀʍ ᴨиᴄᴀᴛь:: [ @lo1kos ] ᴄ уʙᴀжᴇниᴇʍ, ᴀдʍиниᴄᴛᴩᴀция Дᴇᴋᴀᴩᴛ.
🤩1
Signed kitty ʙlsʍ
𝗣𝗶𝗸𝗼𝗿𝗲 & 𝗗𝗘𝗦𝗖𝗔𝗥𝗧𝗘𝗦 Интервью у владельца клана @descartesss Интервьювер - 🦋 Владелец - 🐈 🦋: 1) как вы пришли в вирт? 🐈: в вирт я пришёл совершенно сам того не зная, я просто создал в вк страницу с феликсом из стрей кидс и некоторое время сидел через неё, а потом мне начала попадаться в реках тт виртовская тема и тогда до меня уже дошло что к чему 🦋: 2) почему вы решили открыть свой клан? 🐈: идея была совершенно …
❤1🤩1
Signed 尔 𝘾𝙃𝙍𝙄𝙎𝙏𝙊𝙋𝙃𝙀𝙍 𝘿𝙎𝙍 :: 𝙇𝙉𝙇
Дᴏбᴩᴏᴦᴏ ʙᴩᴇʍᴇни ᴄуᴛᴏᴋ, дᴀʍы и ᴦᴏᴄᴨᴏдᴀ. 𝘿𝙀𝙎𝘾𝘼𝙍𝙏𝙀𝙎 ᴏᴛᴋᴩыʙᴀᴇᴛ нᴀбᴏᴩ нᴀ ᴀдʍиниᴄᴛᴩᴀцию. нᴀʍ нужны :: — ᴀдʍины ᴨᴏ ᴄᴏюɜᴀʍ. — ᴀдʍины ᴨᴏ нью. — ᴀдʍин ᴨᴏ эстету. нᴀʍ нужны ᴧюди, ᴋᴏᴛᴏᴩыᴇ дᴇйᴄᴛʙиᴛᴇᴧьнᴏ хᴏᴛяᴛ ᴩᴀбᴏᴛᴀᴛь и ᴋᴏʍу ϶ᴛᴏ дᴇйᴄᴛʙиᴛᴇᴧьнᴏ инᴛᴇᴩᴇᴄнᴏ. ᴨᴇᴩʙᴏᴇ ʙᴩᴇʍя, ʍы нᴇ будᴇʍ дᴀʙᴀᴛь ᴀдʍинᴄᴛʙᴏ нᴀ ᴋᴀнᴀᴧᴇ ( иʍᴇннᴏ ᴀдʍинᴀʍ ᴨᴏ ᴄᴏюɜᴀʍ. ʙᴄᴇ ᴩᴇɯиʍ ʙ ᴧᴄ) ᴨᴏ ʙᴄᴇʍ ʙᴏᴨᴩᴏᴄᴀʍ ᴨиᴄᴀᴛь :: [ @lo1kos ] ᴄ уʙᴀжᴇниᴇʍ, Адʍиниᴄᴛᴩᴀция Дᴇᴋᴀᴩᴛ. …
❤6👍5🔥4🤯1
Signed 尔 𝘾𝙃𝙍𝙄𝙎𝙏𝙊𝙋𝙃𝙀𝙍 𝘿𝙎𝙍 :: 𝘾𝙃𝘼𝙉𝙀𝙇
дᴏбᴩᴏᴦᴏ ʙᴩᴇʍᴇни ᴄуᴛᴏᴋ, дᴀʍы и ᴦᴏᴄᴨᴏдᴀ. нᴀᴋᴏнᴇц-ᴛᴏ ʍы ᴏᴛᴋᴩыʙᴀᴇʍ нᴀбᴏᴩ ʙ чᴀᴛ :: 𝘿𝙀𝙎𝘾𝘼𝙍𝙏𝙀𝙎 :: ᴇᴄᴧи ʙы хᴏᴛиᴛᴇ ᴨᴏᴨᴀᴄᴛь ᴋ нᴀʍ, ʙᴀʍ нужнᴏ ʙᴄᴇᴦᴏ ᴧиɯь :: ➥ ᴏɜнᴀᴋᴏʍиᴛьᴄя ᴄ ᴨᴩᴀʙиᴧᴀʍи ➥ ᴨᴏдᴨиᴄᴀᴛьᴄя нᴀ нᴀɯ ᴋᴀнᴀᴧ ➥ ᴨᴏᴄᴛᴀʙиᴛь инициᴀᴧы ʙ ниᴋ иᴧи биᴏ. ➥ нᴀᴨиᴄᴀᴛь ᴀдʍину ᴨᴏ нью чᴛᴏ хᴏᴛᴇᴧи бы ᴨᴏᴨᴀᴄᴛь ᴋ нᴀʍ. [ @lo1kos] ¶ ᴇᴄᴧи жᴇ ᴨᴏ ᴋᴀᴋᴏй-ᴛᴏ ᴨᴩичинᴇ ʙы нᴇ ʍᴏжᴇᴛᴇ нᴀᴨиᴄᴀᴛь, ᴨᴩᴏᴄᴛᴏ ᴏᴄᴛᴀʙьᴛᴇ + ᴨᴏд дᴀнныʍ ᴨᴏᴄᴛᴏʍ, ʍы ᴄ ʙᴀʍи ᴄʙяжᴇʍᴄя. ᴄ уʙᴀ…
❤1👍1🔥1
Signed 尔 𝘾𝙃𝙍𝙄𝙎𝙏𝙊𝙋𝙃𝙀𝙍 𝘿𝙎𝙍 :: 𝙑𝙂𝙍
𝙊𝙒𝙉𝙀𝙍 :: 𝗟𝗜𝗟𝗦 «𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘆𝗼𝘂’𝗿𝗲 𝗱𝗼𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗹𝗶𝗸𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗴𝗼𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼 𝗯𝗲 𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗴𝗼𝗼𝗱» ➥ 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙣𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 :: @lo1kos
❤2
Signed 尔 𝘾𝙃𝙍𝙄𝙎𝙏𝙊𝙋𝙃𝙀𝙍 𝘿𝙎𝙍
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @descartesss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,293,764 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@descartesss named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝗗𝗘𝗦𝗖𝗔𝗥𝗧𝗘𝗦” (@descartesss), 17 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/descartesss.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.