4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,801–1,859 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 16:58
1,852
+15
11 Aug 2026, 04:47
1,837
+22
8 Aug 2026, 07:15
1,815
+7
7 Aug 2026, 10:48
1,808
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
57.7%
avg views ÷ 1,852 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,070
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
21 (2 August 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
22,447
Reactions total
724
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
724 reactions across 21 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
328
45.3%
custom 5199524048903630952
203
28.0%
custom 5199423860201520977
97
13.4%
👍
57
7.87%
🤔
27
3.73%
🤡
6
0.829%
custom 5199741150910511919
2
0.276%
👎
2
0.276%
💔
2
0.276%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 724reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
(НЕ)еврокубковые будни #1 🔴
Чуток запоздал с этим постом, но всё же хотел отметить наиболее интересные моменты прошедшего тура Кубка России. Если накидаете 40-50 огоньков🔥 под постом, то делаю рубрику постоянной и пойму, что в кубке копаться кому-то тоже интересно!
🗄 Группа A | ⚽️3 ⚽️3⚽️0⚽️0
2 пятёрочки от «Спартака» и «Родины» удивили. За счёт своего разгрома новички РПЛ попали в историю как авторы одного из крупн…
Александр Бубнов публично угрожает Валентину Пальцеву ⚠️
Накануне эфира нового выпуска «Коммент.Превью» Валентин Пальцев крайне негативно высказался про Александра Бубнова:
Бубнов, кто это? Он не эксперт. Просто старик, но не эксперт. Его слова надо делить на два всегда.
🗣Уже через час Маэстро ответил игроку публично в прямом эфире:
«Я это и Сергею Николаевичу (Галицкому) говорю. Последний раз предупреждаю его (Пал…
Негативные стороны перехода Даку в «Спартак» 🔽
(Часть 1)
Трансфер игрока в «Спартак» является безусловным усилением, однако присутствие Мирлинда в составе может в чём-то сыграть в негативном ключе.
Продолжение про положительные стороны перехода читайте на канале моего товарища с канала
МИР СПОРТА
⚠️Дисциплина. Мирлинд имеет проблемы с поведением. На поле Даку частенько проявляет агрессию, получает много карточек …
Интрига вечера❗️
Забьёт ли Тюкавин? Ему выделили чуть больше 30 минут в кубковой встрече с «Факелом», вот на поле вышел. Костяну чисто для уверенности забить надо, как и всему «Динамо».
Рядовой матч в Воронеже с точки зрения психологии является очень важным. Бело-голубые рискуют начать сезон с 3х матчей без побед подряд, а их главный актив за «30 млн» с безголевой серии.
Но пока есть полчаса ⌛
💙ПОУГАРАТЬ С РПЛ
Стоило похвалить «Рубин» 🤦♂
Не ну в теории, а зачем так относиться к турниру в первом же матче? «Родине» в 3 мяча гореть...
UPD: в 4 мяча
UPD!!!!:В 5 МЯЧЕЙ!!!
💙ПОУГАРАТЬ С РПЛ
Ничего примечательного, просто стартовый состав «Крыльев» на первый тур кубка, но...
Где, блин, Джеффри Чинеду🇳🇬? Зимой в клуб пришёл нигерийский форвард «Астаны», который хорошо забивал в Казахстане и Лиге Конференций. На форварда возлагали надежды, а он тупо не выходит в старте даже на матч группового этапа Кубка, когда других игроков Булатов ротирует. Это настолько тренер не верит в новичка?
Вообще у меня возник…
Реакция Соболева на пост Карпа о сыне форварда 🗣
Соболь по факту свой хейт получает по совокупности "заслуг". Но когда 40 летний мужик с такой огромной аудиторией из факта о жизни ребенка делает инфоповод ради хайпа... Чел в семью полез на публичном пространстве. Как говорил Александр Шмурнов: «У меня во дворе за такое били морду»
Мерзость и позорище. Вы можете представить, чтоб Фабрицио Романо такое постил? Лучше …
2 сенсации кубка России ☄️
Сегодня у нас стартует очередной групповой этап русской Лиги Чемпионов, этап, который, если честно, можно смело скипать. Хотя многим хочется посмотреть на боевую готовность вторых составов своих команд.
Глобально в турнире хочется какой-то очередной сенсации по типу «Балтики» 2024 или «Ростова» 2025. Знаете, что объединяет эти команды? Они завершили групповой этап на вторых строчках и про…
Ребят, вопрос без подвоха! Где делаете ставки на спорт?
Фонбет18%
Винлайн17%
ПариМатч2%
БетБум9%
Мелбет2%
Лига Ставок3%
Не ставлю вообще62%
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @dergachfootb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Ребят, вопрос без подвоха! Где делаете ставки на спорт?
Фонбет18%
Винлайн17%
ПариМатч2%
БетБум9%
Мелбет2%
Лига Ставок3%
Не ставлю вообще62%
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 175,620 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Тёма Дергачев о футболе” (@dergachfootb), 1,852 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dergachfootb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
