Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DEPTH OF BIOLOGY [S.G SIR *]👊 [ PHARMACY + NEET ]

Channel

DEPTH OF BIOLOGY [S.G SIR *]👊 [ PHARMACY + NEET ]

@depthofbio

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

38,451subscribers

-19 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001472016722
TypeChannel
Username@depthofbio
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded27 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/depthofbio

Growth

38,45138,47038,460.527 Aug 2026, 04:45 — 38,470 subscribers27 Aug 2026, 05:00 — 38,470 subscribers28 Aug 2026, 06:16 — 38,451 subscribers27 Aug 2026, 04:4528 Aug 2026, 06:16
3 measurements spanning 1 day, net -19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38,448–38,473 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 06:1638,451-19
27 Aug 2026, 05:0038,470no change
27 Aug 2026, 04:4538,470first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 20 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.00%
avg views ÷ 38,451 subscribers
Avg views / post
769
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
22
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held22 (20 August 202627 August 2026)
Views total16,921
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 05:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTC320 viewsread 28 August 2026

Radiopharmaceuticals | Basic of radioactivity | Application of radioisotopes | Handling,Storage https://youtu.be/GUJJx5agjMg

Signed Itrivedi

25 Aug 2026, 08:25 UTC674 viewsread 28 August 2026

Basics of python programming for pharmaceutical science 🐍 https://youtube.com/shorts/UX6ZmXCW4u8?feature=share

Signed Itrivedi

24 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC819 viewsread 28 August 2026

Previous Question ka Correct Answer yahan hai✅ Par sirf answer nahi....... uska logic bhi samjho. 🎓 Video Explanation Link 👇🏻 https://depthofbiology.com/clinical-case-09/

Signed Itrivedi

24 Aug 2026, 12:55 UTC743 viewsread 28 August 2026

Antimicrobial | Mechanism & Classification | Assay of H2O2 & Chlorinated lime | Iodine & preparation https://youtu.be/jwhPE9zXtXE

Signed Itrivedi

24 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC652 viewsread 28 August 2026

अब मीठा खाना हुआ मुश्किल 😭 https://youtube.com/shorts/7RJFnE4t-bE?feature=share

Signed Itrivedi

23 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC806 viewsread 28 August 2026

Previous Question ka Correct Answer yahan hai✅ Par sirf answer nahi....... uska logic bhi samjho. 🎓 Video Explanation Link 👇🏻 https://depthofbiology.com/guess-the-correct-structure-9/

Signed Itrivedi

23 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC831 viewsread 28 August 2026

Agents Promoting Bowel Movements (Cathartics) | B.Pharmacy 1st Semester https://youtu.be/6o9F4gGOpME

Signed Itrivedi

23 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC762 viewsread 28 August 2026

What’s Your final Diagnosis 🤷🏻 https://youtube.com/shorts/CgBxuQcSRc4?feature=share

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @depthofbio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Carewell Pharma
@carewellpharma · 142,249
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
GPAT DISCUSSION CENTER📚
@gdc4gpat · 45,361
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 27 August 2026
PHARMACY INDIA
@PHARMACYINDIA24 · 46,677
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DEPTH OF BIOLOGY [S.G SIR *]👊 [ PHARMACY + NEET ]” (@depthofbio), 38,451 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/depthofbio.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.