Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Thesis | تزیس

@deonthesis

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

282subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003806479813
TypeChannel
Username@deonthesis
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/deonthesis

Growth

2742822788 August 2026 — 274 subscribers8 August 2026 — 275 subscribers14 August 2026 — 282 subscribers8 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 273–283 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 20:06282+7
8 Aug 2026, 10:51275+1
8 Aug 2026, 09:00274first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
80.3%
avg views ÷ 282 subscribers
Avg views / post
227
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (28 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total4,077
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 19m
Average length
1h 19m

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 11:52 UTC51 viewsread 8 August 2026
File

- آزادی و بنیان حق - فصل نهم از کتاب "هگل" - نوشته فردریک بیزر

7 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC129 viewsread 8 August 2026
File

درباره‌ی تمایز میان تزیس و فوزیس بخش چهارم، قست دوم: مسئله خودانگیختگی و حرکت از انقلاب هنجاری به سمت هنجارمندی انقلابی #کانت #هگل هومن کریمی‌زاده @deonthesis

6 Aug 2026, 15:51 UTC101 viewsread 8 August 2026
File

P. Wolfendale, ‘The Reformatting of Homo Sapiens’, Angelaki 24.2: Alien Vectors (forthcoming, 2019) @deonthesis

4 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC125 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

The General 1926 @BusterKeatonMovies

Signed Hooman karimi

4 Aug 2026, 12:35 UTC199 viewsread 8 August 2026

هنگامی که رسالت داشته باشیم، دیگر انتظارِ چیزی را نمی‌کشیم؛ بلکه از همین‌جا و با همین داشته‌ها آغاز می‌کنیم و منتظر نمی‌مانیم تا شرایط از بیرون برای ما مهیا شود، بلکه تا جای ممکن می‌کوشیم تا با کم‌ترین هزینه آن شرایط را ممکن سازیم. در نتیجه، آغاز می‌کنیم و هیچ ایده‌آل یا کمالی را برای این آغاز فرض نمی کنیم. سپس تا جای ممکن محیط را دستکاری می‌کنیم تا بتوانیم برای رسالتی که بر عهده داریم کاری انجام دهیم. در آغاز، بیشتر

Signed Hooman karimi

4 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTCviews —

Thesis | تزیس pinned «در دفاع از رسالت و وظیفه اگر روح نامی بر نفیِ آن حالتِ اولیه‌ی منفیِ تمامیت‌یافته‌ی طبیعی باشد که از نسبت‌یافتن با دیگری عاجز مانده است، تفاوتِ میانِ این دو نفی خود مستلزمِ ایجادِ چه نوع وحدتی است؟ اگر نفیِ دوم نامی برای گندیدگی و پوسیدگیِ درونیِ ناشی از…»

4 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC201 viewsread 8 August 2026

در دفاع از رسالت و وظیفه اگر روح نامی بر نفیِ آن حالتِ اولیه‌ی منفیِ تمامیت‌یافته‌ی طبیعی باشد که از نسبت‌یافتن با دیگری عاجز مانده است، تفاوتِ میانِ این دو نفی خود مستلزمِ ایجادِ چه نوع وحدتی است؟ اگر نفیِ دوم نامی برای گندیدگی و پوسیدگیِ درونیِ ناشی از هجومِ هولناک و مغلوب‌گرِ «بیرونِ بزرگ» باشد، در این صورت وحدت در حصارِ هویتی ازپیش‌موجود باقی خواهد ماند. این هویتِ ازپیش‌موجود تنها نامی است برای ناتوانی در برابرِ

Signed Hooman karimi

3 Aug 2026, 19:27 UTC117 viewsread 8 August 2026
File

● دوزخ خورشیدی و ژرفنای زمینی ● رضا نگارستانی ● ترجمۀ پیمان غلامی

Signed Hooman karimi

3 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC230 viewsread 8 August 2026
File

مسئله شمول واقعی؛ مارکس و فانکشنالیسم معاصر هومن کریمی‌زاده @deonthesis

Signed Hooman karimi

2 Aug 2026, 07:29 UTC197 viewsread 8 August 2026

طفلِ سرمایه گرهگاهِ اصلی در اینجا، مسئله‌یِ هستی‌شناختیِ جذب(Incorporation) ( لوکاس با برگزیدن این واژه به این امر اشاره می‌کند که نباید بپنداریم سوژه (پرولتاریا) چنان در ساختارِ نحوه‌یِ تولیدِ سرمایه‌داری جذب یا بدن‌مند می‌شود که دیگر تفاوتی میانِ انسان و ابزارِتولید باقی نمی‌ماند. انسان یه کارکرد است که هیچ‌گاه به طور کامل قابل کالایی شدن نیست. تبعیت انسان از سرمایه حل شدن کامل در ساختار آن نیست بلکه وابسته‌شدن اف

Signed Hooman karimi

2 Aug 2026, 05:52 UTC256 viewsread 8 August 2026
File

What is to be Done Under Real Subsumption (London: Mute, forthcoming). @deonthesis

Signed Hooman karimi

1 Aug 2026, 22:06 UTC150 viewsread 8 August 2026

نفیِ متعینِ سرمایه: بازاندیشی در گایست به‌مثابه‌یِ سیستمِ کارکردهایِ بدیل بخش اول هومن کریمی‌زاده رضا نگارستانی در شاهکار خود، هوش و روح، استدلال می‌کند مسئله‌ی شمولِ واقعیِ جامعه در شیوه‌ی تولیدِ سرمایه‌داری—که در خوانشِ فانکشنالیستیِ او یک سیستمِ پیچیده متشکل از مجموعه‌ای از کارکردهاست—به‌معنایِ سازگاریِ کارکردیِ همه‌یِ فعالیت‌هایِ اجتماعی با ساختارِ سرمایه نیست. او معتقد است که اگر کارکردِ سیستم‌ها را به نحوی ت

Signed Hooman karimi

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @deonthesis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 624,530 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Thesis | تزیس” (@deonthesis), 282 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/deonthesis.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.