Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Операционка | Шешуков Денис

Channel

Операционка | Шешуков Денис

@denissheshukov

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,564subscribers

+84 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001180328821
TypeChannel
Username@denissheshukov
Created1 December 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/denissheshukov

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,4783,6423,5607 August 2026 — 3,480 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,478 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,642 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,640 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,637 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,627 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,617 subscribers29 August 2026 — 3,612 subscribers1 September 2026 — 3,602 subscribers5 September 2026 — 3,594 subscribers10 September 2026 — 3,561 subscribers18 September 2026 — 3,564 subscribers3,5647 August 202618 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 43 days, net +84. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,453–3,667 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 23:203,564+3
10 Sept 2026, 13:383,561-33
5 Sept 2026, 13:583,594-8
1 Sept 2026, 10:143,602-10
29 Aug 2026, 03:433,612-5
23 Aug 2026, 10:183,617-10
19 Aug 2026, 20:153,627-10
16 Aug 2026, 20:373,637-3
13 Aug 2026, 11:353,640-2
10 Aug 2026, 15:513,642+164
7 Aug 2026, 13:513,478-2
7 Aug 2026, 08:463,480first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
20m 52s
Average length
2m 37s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

297 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥9030.3%
👍6622.2%
❤5819.5%
💯5016.8%
🏆289.43%
👏20.673%
🤔20.673%
👎10.337%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 297 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @denissheshukov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTC213 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

ℹ️ Фрагмент нашего еженедельного мозгового штурма Вопрос: Создан IT-продукт с высокой добавленной стоимостью за счет своей уникальности. Текущая команда не участвовала ни в создании продукта, ни в разработке идеи, ни в финансировании ❓Нужно ли в этом случае закладывать в мотивацию процент от прибыли? Да, в любом случае мотивация выплачивается из прибыли, а не из кредитных денег Дальше вопрос не в том, какой проце…

🔥5❤3👍1

5 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC286 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#мысливслух НЕ КОМПЕНСИРУЙ ОТСУТСТВИЕ СИСТЕМЫ СОБСТВЕННЫМ ГЕРОИЗМОМ

🔥16👍6🏆5👏1💯1

4 Aug 2026, 14:52 UTC334 views15 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Насколько глубоко посвящать людей в происходящее внутри компании? Нужно ли рассказывать, как распределяются бонусы? Объяснять, из чего формируется прибыль? Показывать финансовые показатели? Однозначного ответа здесь нет. Для начала важно разделить всех, кто работает в компании, на три категории: 1️⃣ Работник Работник – это человек, которому в первую очередь важно, сколько ему платят за час или за выполненную раб…

👍7🔥6❤2

3 Aug 2026, 15:27 UTC374 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

📹 В бизнесе есть действия, которые очень быстро показывают здравость системы управления. В прошлый раз я рассказывал про анализ планёрок. Есть ещё один такой инструмент – анализ процедуры согласования договоров. Типовой договор. ⏩ Маржа – 10 тысяч рублей. ⏩ Согласование – 3–5 недель. ⏩ 7–10 человек в цепочке Один вопрос: Зачем? Анализ логики прохождения договорв - это анализ цепочки принятия решений И если про…

❤7🔥4💯2

28 Jul 2026, 08:53 UTC623 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

И, Боже вас сохрани, не читайте до обеда советских газет! («Собачье сердце») Да, чтение новостей в современной повестке – это тренинг для психики на ее устойчивость и мозга на способность отделять подсказки от депрессивного шума Но, не смог пройти мимо очередной подсказки, всплывшей из новостного потока Немного хронологии Начиная с 1985 года в СССР начинается массовый переход от однотипной советской одежды к модной…

🔥9❤3🏆3👍3

27 Jul 2026, 14:07 UTC694 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

На еженедельном мозговом штурме получил вопрос: Сейчас надо закрыть бизнес или переждать? 📹 Полный разбор этого вопроса выложил на YouTube: https://youtube.com/shorts/dKloFSh2vyk?si=DJdJMPcsF01n2GJe Есть хорошая новость: Любой ПЗДЦ временный. Но если мы говорим не о полном закрытии, а о временной «консервации» бизнеса с последующим запуском, возникают две основные проблемы: 1️⃣ Потеря клиента Закрылась парикма…

❤5🏆3💯3🔥3

27 Jul 2026, 12:59 UTC≈2,380 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Если правильно смотреть новости, то можно увидеть зарождающие тренды и подсказки для бизнеса. Да, кажется, что бизнес ВСЁ САМ, но не надо себе переоценивать, так как бизнес в любой стране живет по правилам, которые он принимает или нет. Я не очень люблю обсуждать политические решения, так как это хайповая, но бестолковая история. Но, в данных постах я не про политику, а про то, как в тоскливых политических паблика…

💯6❤5👍5

26 Jul 2026, 09:06 UTC847 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Когда публикуют такие данные, то настроение ухудшается, так как закредитованность населения по таким космическим ставкам свидетельствует от том, что в стране инфляция не 6% (как пишут в официальных источниках), а в стране длительное снижение покупательского спроса населения. А снижение спроса влияет на большинство продуктов, создаваемых МСБ. "Нет денег" - это остановка импульсных покупок и продуктов относящихся к ка…

🔥13👍7💯4❤3

24 Jul 2026, 08:40 UTC980 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В ближайшее время нас ждет разворот от "я - перепродаю" к "я - копаю". Этот разворот будет после завершения текущего ПЗДЦ и он будет обусловлен изменением требование к безопасности и децентрализации ключевых (стратегических) объектов обеспечительной инфраструктуры. Сегодня мы отстаем от ключевых производителей продуктов широкого потребления и в этой гонке, судя по формирующимся трендам и приоритетам государства, мы…

💯5🔥3🏆2

22 Jul 2026, 08:24 UTC794 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Кусочек диалога с собственником производственной компании: Денис, мне нужна систематизация я хочу создать системную компанию. Александр, а что такое для тебя «системная компания»? Как ты поймешь, что ты создал «системную компанию»? И после этого вопроса возникла долгая театральная пауза 😊 Я понимаю причину данной паузы – хочу «системную компанию», но не могу объяснить что хочу И здесь начинает работать правило «Без…

🔥6💯3🏆2👏1

21 Jul 2026, 16:51 UTC622 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Фрагмент корректирующий стратсессии по итогам 1-2 кв. 2026 Зачастую компания сама не знает, как себя позиционировать. Простой вопрос: ❓Кто мы для нашего клиента? • Как он нас воспринимает? • Как мы сами рассказываем о себе рынку? • Какую выгоду получает клиент, работая с нами? • Какую его потребность или боль мы решаем? Если компания сама не понимает, кто она, она не сможет правильно донести это до клиента. А …

👍7🔥4

20 Jul 2026, 15:07 UTC643 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

📹 В видео разбираю реальный пример аудита планёрки: • какие ошибки снижают управляемость бизнеса • почему обсуждение работы не равно контролю результата • на что руководителю важно обращать внимание при анализе таких встреч Если вы готовы к аудиту своей системы управления, то напишите в комментариях «аудит»

💯5👍4🏆2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @denissheshukov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Jul 2026, 09:01 UTCAnonymous Poll128 voters

Кто станет чемпионом мира по футболу?

  1. 🏆 Испания41%
  2. 🏆 Аргентина59%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Александр Высоцкий
@alexander_visotsky · 36,863
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 1 September 2026
Я — предприниматель
@dashkievpro · 21,205
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 September 2026
Максонская ложа (Канал)
@nomarketolog · 26,914
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 September 2026
Александр Кравцов | Следующий уровень
@akravtsovcom · 33,200
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Операционка | Шешуков Денис” (@denissheshukov), 3,564 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/denissheshukov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.