Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Денис Андреев

Channel

Денис Андреев

@denis_andreev

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,362subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002425010755
TypeChannel
Username@denis_andreev
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/denis_andreev

Growth

2,3622,3672,364.59 August 2026 — 2,367 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,366 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,362 subscribers9 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 5 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,361–2,368 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 11:232,362-4
10 Aug 2026, 19:162,366-1
9 Aug 2026, 22:322,367first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 13 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
35s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,515 reactions across 14 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍59339.1%
😁26817.7%
18111.9%
custom 63255362734359861821429.37%
🔥1308.58%
🤡1026.73%
custom 5240414104656551281402.64%
custom 5237911156630232962161.06%
custom 6220029508456548253161.06%
👎80.528%
🤝80.528%
🤯80.528%
🤬30.198%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,515reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 13 November 2025 to 3 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 14 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @denis_andreev. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 November 2025 to 3 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Apr 2026, 11:33 UTC≈2,820 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 63255362734359861828🤯2custom 524041410465655128121

6 Mar 2026, 14:55 UTC≈167,000 views171 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

Свободный интернет сделал нас патриотами. Суверенный интернет убьет патриотизм. Мы уже это проходили ж, емое. Нужно не впускать их к нам, а не нас отрезать от них. Понимание того, что их ценности - наш противник и мерзость дал именно интернет. Мы их видели и могли видеть их наебалово и неуважение к нам. Мы строили свое, опираясь на то, что не хотим быть как они, мы видели их лицемерие и гнилость. СВО люди поддержали

👍137🔥1110custom 52404141046565512815👎2🤡2custom 62200295084565482532custom 63255362734359861822

5 Feb 2026, 10:02 UTC≈168,000 views131 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

У меня новая шизотеория - Путин святой Не, не буквально. Но смотрите на файл - «инвесторы планируют обсудить возможность начала третьей мировой войны 8 февраля 2026 года» Путин никак не фигурирует в файлах Эпштейна, только как обуза. Так же Путин знал про жертвоприношения, которые раньше нам казались шизой. Так почему бы ему не знать и про план о мировой войне? Для стран запада любое действие это то, что можно мон

custom 63255362734359861827931👍11custom 62200295084565482536😁2🔥1custom 52404141046565512811

3 Feb 2026, 16:35 UTC≈4,090 views109 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Прошёл генетический тест. Шах и мат, Я РУССКИЙ! Комментаторы не правы на 67%. Никакой я не «жид».

😁9113🔥1🤝1custom 52404141046565512811custom 62200295084565482531custom 63255362734359861821

1 Feb 2026, 17:41 UTC≈4,200 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Тут у меня люди собрались самые разные и мне ВАЖНО знать: Если видео на интересующую вас тему, какой хронометраж вы готовы посмотреть?

  1. 20 минут пойдет27%
  2. 40 минут пойдет21%
  3. 1 час норм28%
  4. Могу и 2-х часовое23%
  5. Могу и до 4-х часов включать фоном25%

The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

10😁2🔥1custom 52404141046565512811custom 63255362734359861821

29 Jan 2026, 17:30 UTC≈4,420 views57 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Сходил на «ГОРНИЧНУЮ». Белый, богатый, накачанный, воспитанный мужик трахает и угнетает жену и горничную. Но без западной стыдливости женской сексуальности, сиськи не прячут и не делают вид, что секса не существует, а это плюс. ЛГБТ повестка всех заебала, людям хочется больше видеть стандартных мужских и женских ролей. Психоз жены снова аккуратно переложили на мужа, ход заезженный, но в рамках фильма выглядит правд

custom 632553627343598618225😁137custom 52404141046565512815👍2🔥2👎1🤝1

12 Jan 2026, 15:18 UTC≈6,230 views143 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Вот так поделить и норм, вот четкий план, готовый к столу переговоров 🤝 Только Францию вычеркнуть, там помойки не убирают

🔥89😁386👎4custom 52404141046565512812custom 63255362734359861822👍1🤝1

10 Jan 2026, 14:58 UTC≈184,000 views159 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Взросление наглядно. За каждым, кто ближе к 30 тянется такой коричневый след. Себя не узнали? 🙂 А вот че прикольно, зумеры - дети интернета, внезапно оказались самыми патриотичными. Хотя с детства под влиянием нетфликса и прочих западных приколов. А почему так? Уроки «о важном» и «памяти предков» их сделали такими? Неа, им просто с детства в интернете орали: «русня», «стыдись», «кайся», «ты ошибка», на ютубе прямо

👍127😁86custom 63255362734359861826🤡5🔥4👎1custom 52404141046565512811

9 Jan 2026, 16:34 UTC≈5,500 views138 reactions2 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Адам Кадыров пообещал найти Зеленского и привезти в Грозный «как военного преступника» — АиФ Как пишут СМИ, Адам Кадыров пообещал привезти Зеленского в Грозный, если поступит соответствующий приказ от его отца или российского руководства. Он отреагировал на слова Зеленского о возможности задержания Рамзана Кадырова по примеру США с Николасом Мадуро и заявил, что это только вопрос времени: Так называемый «президент

😁81👍33🤡9🔥8custom 52404141046565512813🤝1🤯1custom 62200295084565482531

9 Jan 2026, 09:01 UTC≈4,760 views106 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

За ночь по Львову прилетел «Орешник», а по Киеву пачка «Кинжалов» и «Искандеров». Ебнули по газохранилищу, где почти половина всего запаса Украины, и по энергетике чтобы не скучали и не грелись лишний раз, а зима не только в календаре была. А были бы эти удары, если бы пиндосы в последнее время не были такими охуевшие? Президента спиздили, танкер спиздили, нашу нефтеразработку в Ираке спиздили. У нас, россиян, за

👍80🔥8custom 524041410465655128164😁3custom 63255362734359861822🤝1🤬1

2 Jan 2026, 12:26 UTC≈182,000 views135 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Потужный дал электричество ровно до конца своего новогоднего обращения. Ни больше ни меньше. Денис Андреев. Подписаться.

🤡83😁30custom 63255362734359861828👍5custom 524041410465655128132🤬2🤝1

19 Dec 2025, 19:49 UTC≈173,000 views81 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Завтра файлы педофила Эпштейна опубликовать обещают. Для тех кто не знает, че это вообще за файлы и пропустил все: Это папки про педофильство мировой элиты. Миллиардер Эпштейн торговал несовершеннолетними девчонками и обслуживал очень влиятельных клиентов: политиков, банкиров, миллиардеров, звёзд. В этих файлах: - кто летал к нему на частный остров - кто с кем общался и тусовался - кто покрывал его годами - и поче

👍646🤯4custom 63255362734359861822🔥1🤝1🤡1custom 52404141046565512811

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @denis_andreev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Feb 2026, 17:41 UTCAnonymous Poll590 voters

Тут у меня люди собрались самые разные и мне ВАЖНО знать: Если видео на интересующую вас тему, какой хронометраж вы готовы посмотреть?

  1. 20 минут пойдет27%
  2. 40 минут пойдет21%
  3. 1 час норм28%
  4. Могу и 2-х часовое23%
  5. Могу и до 4-х часов включать фоном25%

The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 13 November 2025 to 3 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,455,255 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Денис Андреев” (@denis_andreev), 2,362 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/denis_andreev.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.