Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ден растит метрики

@dengrowth

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,240subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002403715620
TypeChannel
Username@dengrowth
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dengrowth

Growth

1,2391,2401,239.57 August 2026 — 1,240 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,240 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,239 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,240 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,239–1,240 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 08:381,240+1
10 Aug 2026, 22:221,239-1
7 Aug 2026, 23:021,240no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:481,240first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 10 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
64.2%
avg views ÷ 1,240 subscribers
Avg views / post
797
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held16 (10 February 20265 August 2026)
Views total1,593
Reactions total124
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
37s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,252 reactions across 16 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 529666536434672758429623.6%
custom 535520166260245509626321.0%
21216.9%
custom 5208945583653395829917.27%
custom 5352652509317967258776.15%
custom 5276289730256842699624.95%
custom 5242635551936360761524.15%
custom 5407119536514145409524.15%
custom 5354832389904281753393.12%
custom 5312220176819716744312.48%
custom 5307678016975962525252.00%
custom 5305240455531736670151.20%
custom 5296328467112025086120.958%
custom 526960399948029109390.719%
🗿70.559%
custom 521786461152452305530.24%
custom 545869434132313605330.24%
💔30.24%

Custom emoji. 15 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,252reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 16 we hold a reading for · 31%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dengrowth. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 February 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC413 views28 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Нейросети для собесов: как побеждать за счет технологий😎 Поймал себя на мысли, что регулярно использую нейронку для собесов. [Как это выглядит у меня] Этап I. Отклик. Вижу интересную ваку — пишу сопровод через нейронку. Этап II. Подготовка к HR. Закидываю описание ваки и пишу: «Вот мой опыт, на чём делать акценты для HR?». Этап III. Разбор HR-скрининга. Транскрипция созвона летит в нейронку: там я смотрю, что ва

custom 529666536434672758420custom 52426355519363607615custom 53122201768197167443

17 Jul 2026, 09:00 UTC≈1,180 views96 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Всё, что я понял о создании резюме за полтора года 😎 Перелопатил кучу материалов, разборов CV и опросников рекрутеров и собрал всё в ноушн. Кратко: • У рекрутера ~7 секунд на твоё резюме. Обязательно нужен Summary абзац + достижения. • Самая частая ошибка у продактов: писать обязанности в духе «запустил проект» вместо «запустил + результат + зачем». • AI-резюме с идеальными метриками больше не работает — теперь э

custom 529666536434672758457custom 520894558365339582923custom 5355201662602455096142

11 Jul 2026, 10:00 UTC≈1,320 views102 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

24 года жизни 🤩 Не так я себе все представлял, когда мы начинали. Мне грезился простой и понятный путь — становлюсь мидлом после буткемпа, веду блог и просто живу спокойную жизнь. Но реальность внесла коррективы: 📍мидлом я и правда стал, но уже не в Авито, а в Райфе. 📍а спокойная жизнь и ведение блога (спасибо политике) встали под большой вопрос, ответом на который в моменте стал запуск сериала по международке. И

63custom 524263555193636076124custom 529632846711202508612custom 52089455836533958292custom 52966653643467275841

3 Jul 2026, 07:00 UTC≈1,350 views90 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Работодатель не готов пригласить вас... или мысли об отборе Пару месяцев назад мне прилетело предложение, от которого было сложно отказаться — пособеситься в одну известную компанию. На первой встрече мне сразу сказали, что придётся много работать с государством из-за специфики продукта. В моменте это не вызвало вопросов: имхо, сейчас почти любой бигтех РФ завязан на эту структуру — особенно в финтехе и e-com. П

custom 529666536434672758453custom 524263555193636076122custom 535520166260245509614custom 53122201768197167441

15 Jun 2026, 07:48 UTC≈1,500 views68 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

😨 Отбор в Школу аналитиков-разработчиков Да-да, у меня поехала кукуха, и я решил попробовать себя в разработке. Оправдание «я гуманитарий» перестало работать, а понимание кода стало требованием даже для обычных продактов. Поэтому, когда я увидел рассылку про ШАР, решил, что это норм стимул прокачаться. Главная гипотеза, которую хотел проверить: Можно ли пройти тестовое в Яндекс, вообще не понимая разработку? Сп

custom 535483238990428175339custom 531222017681971674417custom 5296665364346727584101custom 52426355519363607611

10 Jun 2026, 07:05 UTC≈1,570 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Пост за 10к. И нет, это не реклама 🤓 Как вы знаете, я люблю тратить деньги на всякую херню и делиться, стоило оно того или нет. Поэтому сегодня вашему вниманию консалт по международке за 10к. Что отметил для себя: 1. Где искать ваки? LinkedIn Jobs всё ещё основной источник. Если нужна релокация ставим фильтр visa sponsorship. Из менее очевидного: Otta — для EU-рынка и Wellfound — для поиска стартапов. 2. Что по

29custom 52966653643467275848custom 53526525093179672582

15 May 2026, 08:32 UTC≈1,620 views80 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Серия 3. Попытка номер раз или как прошел отбор в Salmon 🐠 В канале одной из знакомых увидел кейс — человек прошел собес на продакта и релоцировался на Филиппины. Компанией была Salmon — азиатский быстрорастущий финтех, готовый релоцировать людей к себе. Ну, меня долго мотивировать не надо — попросил рефку и полетел собеситься. HR-часть прошла просто, буквально минуту на англе поговорили, остальное на русском. А

custom 535520166260245509645custom 529666536434672758422custom 5208945583653395829112

22 Apr 2026, 07:30 UTC≈1,830 views58 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Собес на мидл-МАРКЕТОЛОГА в e-com!? чтооо 🤯 Но есть нюанс... это было 2 года назад 🤓 Раскапывая файлы на рабочем столе в папке «домашка», помимо дз, внезапно нашёл собес в один крупный маркетплейс.. И тут мне стало интересно глянуть на себя двухлетней давности и понять, чем собес маркетолога отличается от продуктового. Если сильно упрощать, то задача маркетолога — привлекать трафик, а продакта — конвертить этот

custom 535520166260245509636custom 529666536434672758411custom 531222017681971674410custom 53526525093179672581

14 Apr 2026, 10:21 UTC≈1,520 views46 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Серия 2. Do you speak English? Первое, что приходит в голову, когда речь заходит о международке — это английский. И если для техников он может быть не столь важен, то для продакта — это база, на которой всё строится. В моем случае, я оцениваю свой уровень примерно на B1+, что хорошо видно на примере прикрепленного отрывка из собеса в Revolut: было много пауз и ошибок произношения. Поэтому логичным было не отклады

27custom 535520166260245509612custom 54071195365141454096custom 52966653643467275841

6 Apr 2026, 07:01 UTC≈1,440 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Серия 1. Что такое международка? Вот, например, Яндекс — это международка или нет? 🤔 Или вот, например, Aviasales, вроде бы тоже ru-компания, но при этом с удалёнкой и совсем другим ощущением свободы чем тот же Яндекс. Я считаю, что важнее не сам бренд, а то, сколько свободы даёт работа. Поэтому в моём понимании международка — это не столько про громкое имя, сколько про формат жизни и работы. Как бы классифициров

27

4 Apr 2026, 09:45 UTC≈1,640 views118 reactions4 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Новый сериал про Международку 🌎 Пару месяцев назад на собесе в Revolut у меня промелькнула мысль: а что если "да"? готов ли я к этому? И на тот момент в голове прозвучало тихое нет. Не потому, что я не верил в себя и переживал, что не справлюсь. Просто тогда я ещё не относился к этому как к одному из реальных сценариев своей жизни. Международка казалась чем-то интересным, но всё ещё на уровне "приключения на 15 мин

custom 540711953651414540946custom 535520166260245509635custom 5296665364346727584307

19 Mar 2026, 07:45 UTC≈1,710 views109 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Испыталка в Райфе — всё ✅ Время летит очень быстро: ещё вчера я писал о первом дне, а сегодня уже прошло 3 месяца (*тут лекция про важность не терять времени впустую*) Если коротко по Райфу — место зачётное, если будут варики пособеситься к нам, смело рекомендую. Если детальнее, то для меня это оказалось непростой сменой домена: до этого были путешествия в Авито и доставка продуктов в Т, а тут мне пришлось изучать

custom 529666536434672758472custom 5355201662602455096277custom 52178646115245230553

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @dengrowth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,246,444 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ден растит метрики” (@dengrowth), 1,240 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dengrowth.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.