Channel
@delneshteayman
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,907subscribers
-18 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001196819553 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @delneshteayman |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/delneshteayman |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 22:21 | 1,907 | +1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 07:37 | 1,906 | +4 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 03:58 | 1,902 | +1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:39 | 1,901 | +2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:38 | 1,899 | -5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 1,904 | -5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:49 | 1,909 | -10 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:49 | 1,919 | -3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:33 | 1,922 | -3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 07:44 | 1,925 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 1,925 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
56 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 28 | 50.0% | |
| 👍 | 22 | 39.3% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 5.36% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 5.36% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
جوکر یه دیالوگ قشنگ داشت که می گفت: “از کسی که همه دوستش دارن بترس. هیچ آدمی نمی تونه خودشو از همه راضی نگه داره، مگر اینکه یه خصلت کثیف تو خودش پرورش بده و اون دوروییه.”
👍3
Signed 🌵✝ⓄⓂ️ⒾⒹ RAFi Dash Akel
با آنکه مرا از دل خود راند بگویید ملکی که در آن ظلم شود دیر نپاید #فاضل_نظری
❤2
Signed 🌵✝ⓄⓂ️ⒾⒹ RAFi Dash Akel
رفتم از شهرِ تو هرگز نگرانم نشدی ، سوختم در غم و پیگیرِ جهانم نشدی ، من به پایت همه یِ زندگی ام رفت به باد بعدِ مرگم تو ولی فاتحه خوانم نشدی! قلبِ دیوانه ی من بند به چشمانِ تو بود پلک بر همنگشودی ضربانم نشدی . . من به پاییز تو دل بستم و پژمرده شدم حیف یک بار تو درگیرِ خزانم نشدی! سیلِ غم بردلِ من بود و تو با قایق خود بی تفاوت بگذشتی و امانم نشدی :) فرق ها بین تو با من ز همان آغاز بود من دلم تنگ و تا اصلا به گم…
❤2
Signed 🌵✝ⓄⓂ️ⒾⒹ RAFi Dash Akel
جدا شدن از کسی که طعم اولین دوست داشتن رو باهاش چشیدی یه دردیه که نه گذر زمان حلش میکنه، نه حرفهای بقیه...
👍2
Signed 🌵✝ⓄⓂ️ⒾⒹ RAFi Dash Akel
هیچ کس از رنج و تنهایی دیگری خبر ندارد همه ما زیر پیراهن هایمان درون قلب های ساکتمان پشت نقابهای هر روزه خود رنج های بیشماری را پنهان کرده ایم درد هایی که گاهی حتی نمی خواهیم با خودمان هم درباره اش صحبت کنیم چه برسد به دیگران...
👍2
Signed 🌵✝ⓄⓂ️ⒾⒹ RAFi Dash Akel
حرف زدن که کاری نداره همه بلدن قشنگ حرف بزنن ولی این رفتار آدماست که نشون میده واقعا چه حسی بهت دارن و چه جایگاهی توی زندگیشون داری. آخرش همیشه این رفتار آدماست که حقیقتو لو میده نه حرفاشون... #ارسالی_
👍3
Signed 🌵✝ⓄⓂ️ⒾⒹ RAFi Dash Akel
هرکس شده مشغول نصیحت به همه اما ز تماشای خودش، دور شده عیب همه را جار زند هر ساعت بر عیب خودش که میرسد، کور شده... #ارسالی__
👍2
Signed 🌵✝ⓄⓂ️ⒾⒹ RAFi Dash Akel
هر گلی یه بویی داره ... ولی قرار نیست همشو بو کنی !! :) میگیری ک چی میگم..!
👍1🔥1
Signed 🌵✝ⓄⓂ️ⒾⒹ RAFi Dash Akel
حسود نباشید، دورو نباشید، آدم فروش نباشید، زیر آب زن نباشید، دو به هم زن نباشید، پشت آدما حرف نزنید، حداقل اگر دشمن هم شدید، دشمن با شڪوهے باشید. این متن رااابایدباطلا نوشت 😉❣👌 #ارسالی
❤5
Signed 🌵✝ⓄⓂ️ⒾⒹ RAFi Dash Akel
شما هیچوقت نمتوانی یک زن عاشق خودت بکنی، اگرم انجامش بدی مدت کوتاهی دوام می اورد. زنان استعداد عجیبی در عاشق کردن مردان دارند... #امید_رفیع🌳
👍2
Signed 🌵✝ⓄⓂ️ⒾⒹ RAFi Dash Akel
مادر پدرا تنها آدمای خوش دروغگویی هستن. که میگن بین فرزندان فرق نمیزاریم .ولی یکی به عرش می رسانن یکی به فرش... #امید_رفیع🌳
👍3💔1
Signed 🌵✝ⓄⓂ️ⒾⒹ RAFi Dash Akel
من هرگز کسی رو که به خاطر چیز کوچکی گریه میکنه، قضاوت نخواهم کرد. چون خیلی خوب میدونم که اون به آن دلیل گریه نمیکنه، بلکه به خاطر تمام چیزهایی که تا آن لحظه در درون خود نگه داشته است.. #ارسالی
❤5
Signed 🌵✝ⓄⓂ️ⒾⒹ RAFi Dash Akel
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @delneshteayman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کانال دل نوشته های من️🌲✍📚 🧿 ✝” (@delneshteayman), 1,907 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/delneshteayman.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.