شنیدیدن خیلیا میگن؛ اصل اینه که به دل هم بشینین 😌 حالا یعنی چی به دل هم بشینیم🤷 یعنی بیخیال بقیه چیزا بشیمهمین که از طرفمون خوشمون اومد جواب مثبت بدیم؟🤔 اسلایدارو دنبال کنین تا باهم به جوابش برسیم🤓 🆔 ایتا | بله | تلگرام 💟@delaramgroup
❤2

Channel
@delaramgroup
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,886subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001620095303 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @delaramgroup |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/delaramgroup |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:05 | 1,886 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:52 | 1,888 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 1,889 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 1,890 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (4 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,810 |
| Reactions total | 195 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
195 reactions across 24 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 139 | 71.3% | |
| 😁 | 21 | 10.8% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 3.59% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 3.08% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 3.08% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 2.05% | |
| 😭 | 4 | 2.05% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 1.03% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.513% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.513% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.513% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.513% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.513% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.513% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 195reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
شنیدیدن خیلیا میگن؛ اصل اینه که به دل هم بشینین 😌 حالا یعنی چی به دل هم بشینیم🤷 یعنی بیخیال بقیه چیزا بشیمهمین که از طرفمون خوشمون اومد جواب مثبت بدیم؟🤔 اسلایدارو دنبال کنین تا باهم به جوابش برسیم🤓 🆔 ایتا | بله | تلگرام 💟@delaramgroup
❤2
ازدواج آری یا خیر؟🦦 با کدوم نظر ارتباط بیشتری برقرار کردین و براتون قابل لمس بود🤔 🆔 ایتا | بله | تلگرام 💟@delaramgroup
❤5👎1🫡1
ذهنی که آرام نیست، دنیا را هم ناآرام میبیند🧠 گاهی با همه چیز در صلحی، اما ناگهان یک جمله، یک نگاه، یا حتی یک تأخیر ساده، تمام آرامشت را به هم میریزد…🫨 نه چون دنیا بیرحم است، بلکه چون در درونت چیزی بیپناه مانده… و آن چیز، به جای آرام گرفتن، دارد دفاع میکند.✊ روانشناسی میگوید: ذهن ناآرام، جهان را از پشت زخمهایش تماشا میکند. آدمی که زخمیست، حتی مهربانی را تهدید میبیند. حتی عشق را سوءتفاهم میخواند. حتی س…
❤4😭1
به نظر شما... کپشن مناسب برای این کلیپ چیه؟ #چالش 🆔 ایتا | بله | تلگرام 💟@delaramgroup
🤣5😁4
♥️ در غياب آن كه دوستش دارى يتيم ميمانى، حتی اگر تمام دنیا تو را در آغوش بگيرند :) ♥️ 🆔 ایتا | بله | تلگرام 💟@delaramgroup
❤5😭3🌚1
🌙 عاشق کسی شوید که مراقبتان باشد؛ نه از لحاظ مادی، بلکه روحی و روانی. فردی که از ذهن و قلبتان و از آشفتهترین بخشهای وجودتان مراقبت کند. 📚قدرتی در زخمهای ما 🌙 🆔 ایتا | بله | تلگرام 💟@delaramgroup
❤8❤🔥2
ازدواج، بچهدار شدن، دکترا، پولدار شدن؛ هیچکدوم الزاماً کسی رو بالغ و فهمیده نمیکنه. با پیشفرض و انتظار مثبت یا منفی به استقبال آدمها نریم. 🆔 ایتا | بله | تلگرام 💟@delaramgroup
❤7👍2
🧠 تحلیل دلارام اینجا بحث فقط رسم و رسوم نیست؛ بحث اینه که زوج چقدر میتونن مستقل تصمیم بگیرن. ⭕️احترام به خانواده خیلی ارزشمنده؛ اما قرار نیست همه تصمیمهای زندگی مشترک رو خانوادهها بگیرن. 👈قبل از ازدواج بهتره درباره این سؤالها حرف بزنن: ⁉️مرز احترام و دخالت خانوادهها کجاست؟ ⁉️ اگر خانوادهها نظر متفاوتی داشتن، تصمیم نهایی رو چه کسی میگیره؟ ⁉️ آیا یکی از دو نفر همیشه برای راضی نگه داشتن خانواده کوتاه میاد؟ …
❤7
‼️آماده ای برای: 🎯 یه تمرین ۲ دقیقهای برای شناخت فانتزیهای خودت 1⃣یه کاغذ بردار. 2⃣سه ویژگی که فکر میکنی بدون اونها ازدواج نمیکنی رو بنویس. 3⃣حالا کنار هرکدوم جواب بده: 🤔 این معیار رو از کجا آوردم؟ ❌اگر این ویژگی نباشه، واقعاً زندگی مشترک غیرممکن میشه؟ 🧐آیا برای این معیار، مثال نقض سراغ دارم؟ اگر نتونستی جواب قانعکننده بدی… شاید وقتشه دوباره اون معیار رو بررسی کنی. 📌 گاهی ما از معیارهامون دفاع میکنیم،…
❤5👏1
🧠 تفاوت مغز و تفکر زنان و مردان: اما بهتره یه چیزی رو بدونین👀 خانوما موقعی که به مشکلی برمیخورن، ترجیح میدن همدلی و مهربونی دریافت کنن تا راهحل💖 در حالی که آقایون دوست دارن مسائل رو خودشون حل کنن و ممکنه مدتی به غار تنهایی پناه ببرن🚶♂️ در این زمان بهشون فرصت بدین تا مسئله رو با خودشون حل کنن و به راه حل برسن🛠️ ⚠️ ارائه راهحل در این مواقع، برای خانم یا آقا، میتونه باعث برداشت بد در هر دو طرف بشه! 🆔 ایتا | بله…
❤8
⚖️ هفته چهارم | دادگاه دلارام 📂 شرح پرونده خانواده پسر میگن مراسم عروسی باید دقیقاً طبق رسم و رسوم خانواده اونها برگزار بشه. 🎉 دختر میگه بعضی از این رسمها فقط هزینه اضافی و استرس ایجاد میکنه. پسر هم میگه: 💬 «اگه قبول نکنیم، خانوادهم ناراحت میشن.» حالا سـ❓ــــــوال: به نظر تو توی این شرایط، اولویت با رضایت خانوادههاست یا توافق عروس و داماد؟ #دادگاه_دلارام 🆔 ایتا | بله | تلگرام 💟@delaramgroup
❤6
🌝 مهران مدیری حرف قشنگی زد و گفت: همیشه قبل از بحث با هر کسی دو تا سوال از خودتون بپرسید: کجای زندگیشم؟ کجای زندگیمه؟ اگه جواب «هیچ جا» بود بحث بیخود نکنید 🌝 🆔 ایتا | بله | تلگرام 💟@delaramgroup
❤9🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @delaramgroup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,077,942 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دلارام | آموزشگاه تخصصی ازدواج” (@delaramgroup), 1,886 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/delaramgroup.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.