Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net -95,658. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,235,338–5,359,694 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 19:28
5,249,687
-13,727
13 Aug 2026, 13:37
5,263,414
-5,663
12 Aug 2026, 10:26
5,269,077
-12,670
11 Aug 2026, 12:53
5,281,747
-12,820
10 Aug 2026, 16:01
5,294,567
-8,636
9 Aug 2026, 15:12
5,303,203
-13,790
8 Aug 2026, 14:32
5,316,993
-11,269
7 Aug 2026, 13:47
5,328,262
-9,978
6 Aug 2026, 17:00
5,338,240
-7,105
6 Aug 2026, 01:37
5,345,345
first reading
Engagement
82 posts held, back to 30 July 2024 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 3,995 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 82 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
61
Videos
12
Links
66
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
44s
Average length
9s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
21,283 reactions across 20 posts, in 48 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
9,514
44.7%
❤
6,220
29.2%
🔥
1,529
7.18%
👏
632
2.97%
👎
473
2.22%
🥰
458
2.15%
👀
221
1.04%
🖕
192
0.902%
❤🔥
169
0.794%
💘
148
0.695%
💩
147
0.691%
🤣
125
0.587%
🗿
108
0.507%
🍓
102
0.479%
😁
102
0.479%
🤯
100
0.47%
💯
94
0.442%
🫡
87
0.409%
🤮
84
0.395%
🤡
75
0.352%
28 further kinds
703
3.30%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 81 of the 82 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,016,756reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 82 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2024 to 18 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
157
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 81 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
101
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @degens_community. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 82 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2024 to 18 September 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
GM, degens! ☕️
Woke up. Checked bags.
Saw CZ shilling Aster… and yeah, Season 2 farming is live.
Token’s out, points reset.
Trade, hold, invite – farm or cry later.
I’m in. You still coping? ☕️
👉 Farm Aster here
Game | Chat | X (Twitter) | Instagram
woooow, tokens alert! 😜
We just update your DeGENS tokens - time to celebrate (or not)
↪︎ do u grind those 6️⃣6️⃣ characters?
You’ll soon find out how it all pays off.
Stick around, the fun’s just getting started ⚡️
Game | Chat | Discord | X | Instagram
DeGENS, the opportunities are right in front of u! 🤌
- Wanna boost your drop?
Farm DEGENS — or stay broke.
* If you didn’t receive Degens for the planets but completed the games — just click through all the planets.
How to get ’em:
• Unlock planets, expand your territory 🦍
• Buy crystals and snag bonus DEGENS
• Do your damn Tasks ⚡️
• Drain 1% from your referrals (yeah, leech their stash)
Level up:
• More planet…
FASTEST SUPPORT IS HERE 🎯
We’re trying to solve every issue as fast as possible, but exactly you can help us 🫵
@degens_support_bot
If you have any issue, proposal or wanna read FAQ, welcome 🫂
Game | Chat | X (Twitter) | Instagram
NEWS FOR REAL DEGENS! 👨💻
We revamped the UI (coz the old one was dusty af)
→ Faster loads: spend less time waiting, more time flexing.
→ Airdrop Tab: earn Degen coin only by unlocking new chars, planets and quests.
No lazy freebies! 🆗
Update or stay stuck in the stone age.
DeGENS App | Chat | Discord | Twitter (X) | Instagram
🎄 Ho, ho, ho…nah, f$ck that.
New Year’s here, and guess what?
Santa ain’t givin’ freebies.
→ Wanna get loot? Grind or stay broke.
Pop that champagne if you want,
’Coz in DeGENS, only the bold get the gold.
Happy New Year or whatev…
DeGENS App | Chat | Discord | Twitter (X) | Instagram
STICKER PACK???
— Yeeeeep! 🫶
...we just released a set of DeGENS stickers, grab ’em and show off your style.
Drop your fave sticker right now → chatroom
...btw, these aren't all the stickers we have yet 🍸
DeGENS App | Chat | Discord | Twitter (X) | Instagram
Yo, feels like you haven’t invited all your friends to DeGENS yet, huh? 🤔
Time to fix that — those gems aren’t gonna collect themselves! 💎
Oh, and tell your buddy to hop into our chats too — vibes are 🔥 there:
TG Chat: t.me/degens_community_chat
Discord: discord.gg/degens-community
Let’s keep the DeGENS fam growing! 🚀
DeGENS App | Chat | Discord | Twitter (X) | Instagram
GM, faaaaam! 😱
— I woke up in a cold sweat today!
Had a nightmare where I didn’t crush all my goals before the year’s up.
so guess what?
↳ I’m back to grind DeGENS!
Where you at? Still snoozing? Nah, don’t embarrass yourself.
Join the grind: @DegensCryptoBot
DeGENS App | Chat | Discord | Twitter (X) | Instagram
🍸 Some work, others farm gems!
— Where you at?
In the 9-5 or vibin' with us?
Good thing it’s the weekend
DeGENS App | Chat | Discord | Twitter (X) | Instagram
Did you know? 🤑
We’re running quizzes with real cash prizes on the reg in our Discord!
Hop in, test your skills, and bag some extra $$$. After all, those Telegram Stars won’t buy themselves, right? ⭐️
The next round is tomorrow at 2 PM UTC on the #quiz channel! Don’t miss it!
👉 discord.gg/degens-community
Let’s get that loot, DeGENS! 🚀
DeGENS App | Chat | Discord | Twitter (X) | Instagram
👍1,040❤544👏157💩52🍌51🤣51🖕48🔥47
Showing the 12 most recent of 82 posts we hold for @degens_community. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,102,493 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
5
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
5
vacant every time we have ever looked
@degens_community named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@celottti named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@kasatka_blu named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@souravch199 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@viktor198305 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@xyzb120 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Domains linked from posts
3 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DeGENS Community” (@degens_community), 5,249,687 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/degens_community.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.