Channel
@degenkazakh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
425subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001632294730 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @degenkazakh |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/degenkazakh |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:39 | 425 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 428 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 428 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
43 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 14 | 32.6% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 16.3% | |
| 🫡 | 7 | 16.3% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 11.6% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 11.6% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 6.98% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 4.65% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2025 to 26 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @degenkazakh. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2025 to 26 November 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
кто то может и знает @RickSol,вот этому человеку я давал 8700$ чтоб фармить операцию в кс еще в мае,полгода блять прошло,но бабки я так и не получил назад,получил только 300$,уже больше месяца просто игнорит,закину большой пост в течении пары часов со всеми пруфами
❤1
Signed dauletzhan
походу меня скамнули на 8400$,гг
🤯4
Signed dauletzhan
6 лярдов ликвидации за час,такой раг был в истории крипты вообще?
Signed dauletzhan
есть 2 акка с доступом к подарку дурова,только вот выкупать их бабок нет,пишите в лс кто за сколько готов брать @dltzhn
Signed dauletzhan
так же я сдал свое кресло назад на котором сидел год,это samurai s-3(фотка снизу)перед этим у меня кресел не было,тк это мое первое кресло еще и сеточное было все ахуенно,только вот меня заебало сидеть на сеточном,да жопа не потеет но со временем жесткость чувствовалось все больше,+под мои параметры не подходило но забивал хуй на это теперь хочу посидеть на мягкой экокоже,+под рост 193 вес 92 чтоб подходил,у меня бы…
❤3
Signed dauletzhan
я вернулся,месяц ничего не делал кроме отдыха,фулл чилил,пока банка у меня нет,жду бабок и начнем воркать🚽
😢3
Signed dauletzhan
я побрит,вышел в -2500,маржи не хватит передержать,пойду чилить нахуй лудку🤡
❤2🤣2
Signed dauletzhan
ебать с кампом пиздец,хорошо что спал,опять под ноль бреют снг
❤1
Signed dauletzhan
забрали жбшку?
Signed dauletzhan
ладно,со вчерашнего более менее отошел,продолжаем отрабатывать хуйню разную набрал шорта по хпл,твх .54,готов добирать если дадут корейские биржи,уж слишком она раздутая,челики сидят в х12,фдв 6 лярдов,кому нужен очередной блокчейн,жду ниже .4,там буду фикситься думаю,пока его туда сюда носят набираю по чуть чуть
Signed dauletzhan
так,тотал минус -13к в частности это несоблюдение рм,но я не считаю это несоблюдением,скорее тем что не закрылся в минус 1.5к когда давали,тк шортил щиток с 0.012,с усреднениями дошло вплоть до 0.03,но палку дали на 0.08,хорошо что балик раскидан был по биржам,так бы весь доступный балик трахнули щя банк на тех значениях который был в апреле этого года,минуснул почти половину,мб 40-45%,какой из этого урок,скорее вс…
🫡7❤4
Signed dauletzhan
с кайфом был выебан
Signed dauletzhan
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @degenkazakh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 558,765 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“вип лудка казаха” (@degenkazakh), 425 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/degenkazakh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.