Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

1000X-DEGEN call

@degen1000call

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

59subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002594923000
TypeChannel
Username@degen1000call
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 22 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/degen1000call

Growth

597 August 2026 — 59 subscribers10 August 2026 — 59 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 58–60 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 06:0059no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:2759first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 22 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
24
Links
18

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

352 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍21861.9%
9627.3%
🔥3710.5%
👏10.284%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 352reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2025 to 26 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Aug 2025, 09:38 UTC823 views26 reactionsread 10 August 2026

https://cryptopond.xyz/markets/2a046a9e-7098-4ef5-82fa-395340cb8d2c This is a gambling game on the Base chain. I’m personally quite optimistic about this subscription model.

👍215

25 Aug 2025, 20:36 UTC843 views23 reactionsread 10 August 2026

https://x.com/degen_degen777/status/1960078514725826886?s=46

👍185

11 Aug 2025, 06:31 UTC869 views37 reactionsread 10 August 2026

$SPARK has a strong narrative itself. Held from 3.2M all the way to 40M. Currently, it looks like 60-100M should be no problem. Been traveling recently, so updates are less frequent—sorry about that. 5zCETicUCJqJ5Z3wbfFPZqtSpHPYqnggs1wX7ZRpump

👍229🔥6

8 Aug 2025, 18:34 UTC778 views33 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

$MARIE Focus on dips. The next breakout is coming. ETH season is here. Pay close attention. https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xd8af189b47b27fb698910f4e89a24ba26bcef59c

👍1710🔥6

6 Aug 2025, 11:14 UTC840 views30 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Since $MARIE's market cap was 200K, I've been telling you all to buy $MARIE. It just hit a new high of 11M, still less than 1% of $SPX's market cap. The mascot is definitely worth 10% = 100M. With the support of $SPX OGs, it'll get there fast. Remember this logic: $MARIE = 1% of $SPX = 10M $MARIE = 10% of $SPX = 100M This will be a 100M gem. Hold to the moon 0xcaa1E525ACb44aeC4e0D17a0e2467AA3Ea7EE3A6 https://d

👍216🔥3

5 Aug 2025, 09:32 UTC≈1,170 views34 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

$MARIE I started calling at 200k. Today it hit 8M, 40X. I said before: SPX OGs are all buying MARIE. Murad himself is interacting with the MARIE IP today. MARIE is about to stabilize at 10M, aiming for 100M. $MARIE = $ANDY $SPX = $PEPE https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xd8af189b47b27fb698910f4e89a24ba26bcef59c

👍18🔥97

31 Jul 2025, 09:10 UTC812 views24 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

hit 2.5m again https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xd8af189b47b27fb698910f4e89a24ba26bcef59c

👍213

28 Jul 2025, 12:37 UTC799 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🚀 BTC breaks through 120K, altcoin season is about to start! The newly launched Alpha project $PHY is a must-watch! $PHY combines AI and DePIN to build innovative infrastructure, perfect for investors eyeing physical assets without the hassle. 🔥 Highlights: 1️⃣ No need to buy miners—hold NFTs to enjoy “on-chain mining” profits! 2️⃣ Over 30,000 global nodes, with a self-developed messaging layer boasting just 500ms

10👍2

28 Jul 2025, 04:41 UTC794 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

$MARIE 200K-2.3M, 11.5X. 5X to go until the next phase goal of 10M. Remember, Murad is about to engage. Let’s sprint to 100M! 0xcaa1e525acb44aec4e0d17a0e2467aa3ea7ee3a6

4

27 Jul 2025, 02:58 UTC807 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

$MARIE hit 1.5m now1.2m is alpha 。 Many $SPX whales are building positions in $MARIE. This narrative is gaining traction. If SPX officially engages with the Marie community, this alpha could quickly break 10M. 0xcaa1E525ACb44aeC4e0D17a0e2467AA3Ea7EE3A6

👍91🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @degen1000call. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“1000X-DEGEN call” (@degen1000call), 59 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/degen1000call.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.