Ушла эпоха.
🔥1

Channel
@defi_twinkovod
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
18subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001786982518 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @defi_twinkovod |
| Description | Зарегал 20 аккаунтов на pancakeswap.finance. Фармлю там IFO и разные другие активности. Тут буду описывать что и как. Для себя и тех, кому интересно. Связь через @defi_twinkovod_bot |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 24 May 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/defi_twinkovod |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 18 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 18 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 May 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 September 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
23 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 9 | 39.1% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 34.8% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 8.70% | |
| 🤮 | 2 | 8.70% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 4.35% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 4.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2022 to 15 September 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ушла эпоха.
🔥1
Давно не было иксов по инвестициям. Когда начался дуал-майнинг ETH+KAS, я посмотрел на эту монетку и решил ее чутка притарить, пока сеть мелкая. С расчетом на то, что народ постепенно втянется в майнинг и цена вырастет. Сегодня отмечаю х10 от вложений. Сумма там была не существенная, но приятно все равно.
👍3
На все домены, куда влез, пришли кошельки покрупнее моего и почти все отжали ☹️ получил только один домен кроме именного. Ну ок. Посмотрим, во что это выльется все в итоге.
А вы будете участвовать?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
На https://dns.ton.org/ начались аукционы по доменным именам в сети TON. К сожалению, на короткие имена начальные ставки слишком высоки для простых смертных вроде меня. Но пару доменных имен подлиннее на перепродажу надеюсь урвать. В том числе и именной домен себе любимому.
На днях хотел купить робота Biswap на 10000 робибустов за 1400$. Смотрел на APY от их стейкинга, выглядело прикольно: 145% годовых. Сделал ставку на аукционе, но ночью ее перебили и робота я не купил. Аналогичных вариантов в продаже утром не было, а в обед вышла новость, что они срезали доходность по роботам! Теперь там всего 25% годовых! Вот это повезло так повезло, что не купил! :)
👍2
Кейксвап запускает новый IFO по новым правилам! Прайвет сейл остаётся как и был - пропуск по нфт на аватарке профиля. А вот паблик сейл теперь лимит участия ограничивается очками iCake. Их дают за "длинный" стейкинг кейков в залоченном пуле. Грубо говоря, чтобы поучаствовать на 100 кейков в IFO, нужно ещё 100 кейков залочить недель на 40.🤪 Во-первых, мои твинки снова не у дел. ((( Во-вторых, лочить половину кейков, ч…
🤮2🔥1
Продалась наградная нфт за 0.6 BNB. По майскому курсу - это вдвое увеличило прибыль с участия в соревновании. Не плохо!
Раз такая тишина, обновил пока табличку итоговую из закрепа. Добавил в нее свою историю стейкинга CAKE и BSW, начиная с 26 января.
🔥1
Что-то ничего не происходит. Тишина кругом. Крипто зима? Или я не туда смотрю? Пишите интересное в @defi_twinkovod_bot
💩1
Biswap дают не плохой процент по доходности в пуле с наградой BSW+ETH. Нужно 300 монет держать в "длинном" холде (там 36% APY) и тогда до 1000 монет можно будет вложить в этот пул с ETH. У меня 1000 нет. Сколько есть - занес. 🤑
🔥1
Я вернулся! :) Из хорошего: продалась последняя NFT-шка с новогоднего дропа. В общей сложности баксов 60 в плюс с них получилось. Из плохого: вы сами в знаете, что там с курсами творится. Обвалилось все знатно. Из нейтрального: Прямо перед выездом закрыл весь стейкинг в Ripae в сети полигон. Посчитал, что космические проценты доходности не окупят падение цены токенов проекта. Так оно и вышло. Так что правильно сде…
🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @defi_twinkovod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А вы будете участвовать?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2022 to 15 September 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“20 твинков на кейксвапе и другие приключения” (@defi_twinkovod), 18 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/defi_twinkovod.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.