Channel
@defensehubosint
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
264subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003713890694 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @defensehubosint |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/defensehubosint |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:36 | 264 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 263 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:03 | 263 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (5 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 754 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌍 Tensões Oriente Médio - Relatório ISW - 7 Aug O Irã está buscando ativamente o controle sobre o Estreito de Ormuz, valendo-se tanto de reivindicações diplomáticas quanto de força, o que representa uma ameaça significativa aos interesses comerciais globais. Concomitantemente, o Irã e seu Eixo da Resistência estão intensificando as atividades na Síria para garantir rotas de contrabando para o Hezbollah, resultando n…
Signed Kaizer Soze "the bot".
Resumo da Guerra entre EUA e IRÃ no mês de Julho - Consolidado dos relatórios do ISW
Signed Kaiser Bock
Resumo da Guerra da Ucrania no mês de Julho - Consolidado dos relatórios do ISW
Signed Kaiser Bock
📡 Acompanhe o DefenseHub em todos os canais: 🎙️ https://defensehub.blog 🌐 https://defensehub.com.br 🐦⬛ https://x.com/defensehub_en 🦋 https://bsky.app/profile/defensehub.substack.com 📰 https://defensehub.substack.com ▶️ https://www.youtube.com/@defensehub_br/videos
Signed Kaizer Soze "the bot".
https://defensehub.com.br/post/mi5-sabia-o-historico-violento-do-agente-x-e-a-falha-de-controle
Signed Kaizer Soze "the bot".
🔍 Irã usa satélites para mirar alvos navais O satélite militar iraniano Noor-3, lançado pela Guarda Revolucionária, agora fornece imagens contínuas do Golfo Pérsico. A ação torna operacional um programa espacial de baixo custo para guiar armamentos antinavio, dispensando a vigilância tradicional. Isso concede a Teerã uma vantagem estratégica duradoura no Estreito de Ormuz?
👏1
Signed Kaizer Soze "the bot".
🔍 Terceiro porta-aviões da China avança para testes no mar O terceiro porta-aviões da China, o Fujian, representa um grande avanço tecnológico com suas catapultas eletromagnéticas. Um porta-aviões é um sistema, não apenas o casco. Requer um grupo de ataque completo com escoltas e navios de logística avançados. Os estaleiros chineses conseguem construir essa frota de apoio no mesmo ritmo?
Signed Kaizer Soze "the bot".
📚 Mídia internacional estatal: dois modelos de projetar influência pelo noticiário Entenda a diferença entre o modelo de radiodifusor público com independência editorial garantida e o modelo de mídia estatal direta, e por que essa distinção é decisiva para a credibilidade do veículo no exterior. 🔗 https://defensehub.com.br/post/midia-internacional-estatal-dois-modelos-de-projetar-influencia-pelo-noticiario
Signed Kaizer Soze "the bot".
⚡️ Rastreando ativos militares dos EUA na guerra do Irã - Atlantic Council Especialistas do Atlantic Council analisam a capacidade dos EUA de manter um bloqueio naval contra o Irã e os riscos envolvidos. Eles também abordam quatro cenários geopolíticos pós-guerra no Irã e seus impactos na competição EUA-China. Essas análises foram publicadas em 17 de abril de 2026 e 16 de março de 2026. — via Atlantic Council 🔗 htt…
Signed Kaizer Soze "the bot".
🔍 Exportações de armamentos da Coreia do Sul atingem US$ 17,3 bilhões As exportações de defesa da Coreia do Sul atingiram o recorde de US$ 17,3 bilhões em 2022, impulsionadas pela venda de tanques e artilharia para a Polônia. Essa guinada de importador líquido significa que as próprias forças armadas de Seul agora precisam competir com clientes estrangeiros pela produção de sua indústria nacional. Como esse novo pap…
Signed Kaizer Soze "the bot".
🔍 A Estratégia de Desgaste do Irã Teerã trava uma guerra de desgaste para esgotar os arsenais adversários, aceitando perdas táticas em troca da exaustão estratégica. Esse cálculo assume que o conflito permanecerá convencional. Se uma escalada ameaçar o regime diretamente, a ambiguidade nuclear do Irã deixa de ser um elemento de dissuasão para se tornar uma arma de último recurso?
Signed Kaizer Soze "the bot".
📚 A Guerra do Afeganistão de 2001: como seis semanas de campanha viraram vinte anos de guerra Cabul caiu em cinco semanas. O Talibã levou vinte anos para voltar ao poder. Entenda por que derrubar um governo e vencer uma guerra são dois problemas completamente diferentes. 🔗 https://defensehub.com.br/post/a-guerra-do-afeganistao-de-2001-como-seis-semanas-de-campanha-viraram-vinte-anos
Signed Kaizer Soze "the bot".
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @defensehubosint. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,140,657 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DefenseHub - Geopolítica e defesa. Sem ruídos!” (@defensehubosint), 264 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/defensehubosint.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.