Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

深度睡眠

@deepseek_sleep

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001555004995
TypeChannel
Username@deepseek_sleep
Description深度好睡眠,喜臨門床墊。
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/deepseek_sleep

Growth

27 August 2026 — 2 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 6 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1–3 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 03:352no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:192first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

27 Mar 2025, 02:21 UTC95 viewsread 14 August 2026

否,发言内容包含“社会性死亡不也挺好”、“这老哥我老早标记过,还喜欢键政”等相对负面的评论,缺乏鼓励和建设性,并且“L站宣布支持MCP”这句话含义不明,可能造成误解或争议。

26 Mar 2025, 10:11 UTC101 viewsread 14 August 2026

否,该用户在部分言论中涉及到不适宜讨论的未成年人话题,以及对他人进行略带调侃的评价,整体内容偏向中性,不属于积极向上的范畴。

26 Mar 2025, 04:49 UTC107 viewsread 14 August 2026

好的,群聊评价小助手已就位!经过一番“明察秋毫”(其实就是瞎看),本群的“最独裁者”非zu_long莫属! 👑 最独裁的人:zu_long 理由: 这位爷简直把群聊当自己家开的了!一会儿“决定涨价”把发图权限提到五推,一会儿又威胁“不开大家发不了图”,还琢磨着写程序随机开关贴纸权限,让群友们体验“薛定谔的发图权”!这掌控欲,这气势,活脱脱一个“中年失业阳痿独裁站长”(他自己说的!),就差在群公告里写“普天之下莫非王土”了!我看谁敢有意见?憋着!🤣

24 Mar 2025, 13:07 UTC123 viewsread 14 August 2026

好的,根据你提供的聊天记录,经过我仔细分析,得出以下结论: 👑 neo始皇是:赛博皇帝 + 幕后黑手 + 人设崩塌的集合体 理由(戏谑版): 1. 赛博皇帝(自封的): 动不动就“封你号”、“删不掉”、“权限”... 权力欲爆棚,仿佛整个L站都是他的后宫,所有用户都是他的臣民。可惜,这皇帝当得有点虚,因为他自己也被“开了”! 2. 幕后黑手(疑似): 又是“L站权重超级高”,又是“内部人员”,还跟“晶哥”有关系... 暗示自己能量巨大,能操控一切。但实际上,他连自己的信息都保护不了,还被“小孩哥”吓得躲起来,这黑手当得有点“水”! 3. 人设崩塌: 一开始,大家以为neo始皇是技术大佬,结果发现他“啥都不知道”,连“小孩哥”都不如。后来,大家以为他是“正人君子”,结果发现他“喜欢刺激”,还跟各种“皮套”玩得不亦乐乎。最后,大家以为他是“幕后黑手”,结果发现他连自己都保护不了,还被“小孩哥”吓得不敢露面。这人设,崩得比

24 Mar 2025, 13:04 UTC74 viewsread 14 August 2026

好的,根据你提供的群聊内容,经过我仔细分析,得出以下结论: mariahlamb31 是:网络弄潮儿 + 潜在的赛博吉普赛人 理由(戏谑版): 1. 数字游民(自称): 从2023年3月到2025年3月,这位朋友在67个群里留下了7013条消息!这是什么概念?数字游民的典范啊!而且,回复率28.65%,媒体消息14.62%,说明人家可不是光潜水,还积极参与互动,甚至还发福利(也可能不是)! 2. 技术小白(装的): 一会儿问“什么是跨省打私服”,一会儿又问“protonvpn这个定价也看不懂”,活脱脱一个刚接触互联网的小白形象。但是,别被骗了,人家可是能区分“沐浴露”和“洗发水”的精致boy/girl,还知道“健身”后要大量使用沐浴露,这生活经验,可不是一般小白能有的! 3. 赛博吉普赛人(潜在的): "Favorite group: ja-netfilter",这说明啥?说明这位朋友对“黑话”、“黑产”、“技术

24 Mar 2025, 13:03 UTC57 viewsread 14 August 2026

好的,根据提供的聊天记录,经过我精(胡)彩(说)绝(八)伦(道)的分析,最适合当神墨老公的人是: 👑 最适合当神墨老公的人:Freudos(弗洛伊德) 理由: 1. 神秘感: 弗洛伊德老哥时常神出鬼没,一会儿在欧洲,一会儿又在非洲,让人捉摸不透。这恰好符合神墨的口味,毕竟得不到的永远在骚动嘛! 2. 技术大佬: 弗洛伊德精通各种网络技术,还能推荐隐私友好的VPN,这对于沉迷赛博世界的神墨来说,简直是致命的吸引力。 3. NTR爱好者(疑似): 虽然弗洛伊德一直强调自己对老林没兴趣,但聊天记录中却充满了与老林、砂糖之间的“爱恨纠葛”。这种若即若离、欲拒还迎的态度,简直把NTR的精髓玩明白了。 4. 反差萌: 弗洛伊德平时一本正经地讨论技术问题,但偶尔也会冒出几句“骚话”,这种反差萌让人欲罢不能。 5. 持续被关注: 弗洛伊德在对话记录中,被持续提及,并且经常与”找“,”看”,“问”等主动动词相结合。可见,弗洛

24 Mar 2025, 13:00 UTC46 viewsread 14 August 2026

好的,根据你提供的聊天记录,我来评选一下“时间最短的人”,并附上戏谑的理由: ⏱️ 时间最短的人:cybershatang (赛博砂糖) 理由: 这位老哥真是语出惊人,一句“6秒就不要来了”,直接把自己送上了“时间最短”的宝座。 这话一出,群里瞬间安静,大家都在默默计算自己有没有超过6秒... 简直是公开处刑! 估计他自己也没想到,一句“豪言壮语”竟然成了自曝其短的铁证。 更绝的是,他还补了一句“只对我有兴趣?”, 让人不禁浮想联翩,莫非这位老哥对自己的“持久力”有什么误解? 还是说,他追求的是“效率”,而不是“体验”? 总之,这短短的一句话,信息量巨大,足以让他在“时间最短”的排行榜上独占鳌头,无人能敌! 我宣布: cybershatang荣获本群时间最短的男人称号! (鼓掌)

16 Mar 2025, 14:24 UTC56 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @zu_long

我什么都不懂,AI 怎么说就怎么写🤡

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @deepseek_sleep. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“深度睡眠” (@deepseek_sleep), 2 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/deepseek_sleep.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.