Channel
@dedvpn_pulse
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,451subscribers
-50 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003422178156 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dedvpn_pulse |
| Created | 22 November 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dedvpn_pulse |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 2,451 | -10 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:57 | 2,461 | -30 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:49 | 2,491 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 2,495 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:55 | 2,497 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:51 | 2,500 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 2,501 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 22 November 2025 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
615 reactions across 7 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 211 | 34.3% | |
| 🤝 | 134 | 21.8% | |
| 👍 | 47 | 7.64% | |
| 👀 | 44 | 7.15% | |
| 😭 | 42 | 6.83% | |
| 🥰 | 42 | 6.83% | |
| 👏 | 34 | 5.53% | |
| 🕊 | 19 | 3.09% | |
| 🙊 | 10 | 1.63% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 1.46% | |
| 💋 | 8 | 1.30% | |
| 🤬 | 8 | 1.30% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 0.813% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 0.325% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 615reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 22 November 2025 to 30 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Начинаем работы по улучшению нашей инфраструктуры. Временно может перестать работать реферальная система В случае, если что-то не зачислится или потеряется, напишите, пожалуйста, нам. Обязательно разберемся и вернем :) UPD. Работы завершены, все снова работает как и раньше 👌
🥰42👍20😁5🤣2
Cloudflare снова приболел. Наверное, пятничный релиз Наблюдаются трудности с доступом к тысячам сайтов, включая ChatGPT и Perplexity Ждем, когда починят ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
👀44❤15👍12🙊10
Наша Служба Заботы вновь перегружена Что произошло? - Снова появились сообщения о блокировке VLESS (как мы уже выяснили — это фейк) - Новый виток блокировок WhatsApp - Блокировка Roblox - Блокировка FaceTime Что дальше? Мы все еще на связи, но отвечаем медленнее. Перед обращением попробуйте, пожалуйста, следующее: 1. Переустановите конфигурацию Куда нажимать: @dedvpn_robot → /start → Профиль → Мои VPN → [Ваш серве…
❤51🤬8😭6🔥5
Закончили последние тестирования и настройки Если у вас остались проблемы и новый VLESS XHTTP не помогает — переустановите конфигурацию в боте и смените тип VPN на VLESS mK Также не забывайте, что теперь нужно использовать новые приложения: Android/iOS — Happ (Android, iOS с РФ регионом) или V2Box (Android, iOS) ПК — v2rayN Инструкция для Windows - https://info.dedushka.top/vless-windows Инструкция для iOS — https…
😭36❤29👍13👏5
🌠 Возвращаемся в Интернет! ✋ РКН начал частично блокировать ряд механизмов шифрования протокола VLESS. Это привело к страшной суете в рунете и панике небольших VPN-сервисов. Но дедушке любые штормы нипочем — он опытный моряк 😎 😍 Мы уже закончили работы на всех серверах и обновили везде конфигурации. Чтобы вновь подключиться — необходимо переустановить Вашу конфигурацию и сменить тип VPN на новый (и единственный) VL…
🤝134❤67👏29💋8
Наблюдаются массовые блокировки. Особенно заметно это на МТС и МГТС ❓ Что делать Инструкция для iOS — https://info.dedushka.top/ios-happ Инструкция для Android — https://info.dedushka.top/android-happ Обязательно просмотрите страницу полностью! ❌ Если эти инструкции не помогли — измените тип VPN на Trojan и используйте Happ. Необходимо добавить новый конфиг повторно. Если VPN не заработает — измените тип VPN на Out…
❤36🕊13🔥4👍2
ℹ️ Мы запустили DedVPN Pulse. 🙅♂️ В последнее время всё чаще начали появляться проблемы из-за локальных блокировок: что-то перестаёт работать, где-то режут трафик, у кого-то падает доступ. И это напрямую влияет на работу VPN, и многим не понятно, что происходит. Однако, наш новостной канал не подходит для частых публикаций "с полей"... ⚡️ Мы сделали этот канал, чтобы не попадаться на такие сюрпризы, а также не пу…
❤13🕊6
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @dedvpn_pulse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 867,123 of 1,605,487entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DedVPN® Pulse” (@dedvpn_pulse), 2,451 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dedvpn_pulse.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.