Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ДЕКОРИРУЙ

Channel

ДЕКОРИРУЙ

@decoriruy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

4,824subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001932889561
TypeChannel
Username@decoriruy
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/decoriruy

Growth

4,8244,8414,832.56 August 2026 — 4,840 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,840 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,841 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,835 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,826 subscribers15 August 2026 — 4,824 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 9 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,821–4,844 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 14:384,824-2
12 Aug 2026, 13:054,826-9
9 Aug 2026, 19:314,835-6
6 Aug 2026, 15:134,841+1
6 Aug 2026, 03:504,840no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:174,840first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.79%
avg views ÷ 4,824 subscribers
Avg views / post
328
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.96%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held12 (3 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total3,931
Reactions total281
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 05:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 49s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

281 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12444.1%
🔥7024.9%
❤‍🔥4014.2%
🥰155.34%
💯103.56%
👌62.14%
👏62.14%
31.07%
👍31.07%
👀20.712%
🤷‍♀20.712%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 281reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTC169 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Балдахин над кроватью всегда мне кажется чем-то тяжелым, но вот облегченный вариант — небольшой отрез тюля или кружева — выглядит изящно и вполне заслуживает нашего внимания..

❤‍🔥64🔥3👏1

11 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC229 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня хочу показать вам обволакивающий интерьер дизайнера Кристины Буско в Испании. Смотрите какое буйство геометрии, наполненное деталями, фактурами, красками и тканью. Берем на заметку: • необычная форма зеркал • неслучайно неровно выложенная плитка на полу рядом с душевой • интересная драпировка ткани, которая используется как перегородка • веер как искусство • розетки в цвет изголовья кровати • рисунок на пот

7🔥4❤‍🔥2🤷‍♀2🥰2

11 Aug 2026, 06:06 UTC259 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Эти природные держатели для скатерти напоминают нам, что лето продолжается.. Видео: Trenkler

🔥1310👌3❤‍🔥2

10 Aug 2026, 18:43 UTC321 views32 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

А зачем вообще нужна эта акцентная плитка? Видео: Natalie Jorge

13💯10❤‍🔥4👌3👏2

10 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC329 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Я все еще выбираю акцентную плитку, вдруг вам тоже нужно. Это все наши: • NOMY tiles • REDA • ECLAT CERAMIC • ФАКТУРА • CEZZLE • PLAKART ceramics #наши

13🔥7❤‍🔥3🥰2

7 Aug 2026, 07:22 UTC259 views27 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Я не фанат лилий в букетах, но в этом году у мамы в саду выросли такие красивые, что я посмотрела на них с другой стороны. Как оценим эту солнечную композицию? ♥️ — 9-10 🔥 — 5-8 👍 — 1-4 Видео: cowboypetals

16❤‍🔥5🔥4🥰2

5 Aug 2026, 08:58 UTC368 views24 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Есть тут фанаты яичницы? Мне попалось в рекомендациях такое вот устройство. Смотрится эффектно, конечно. Но я бы не взяла, мне ручной процесс больше нравится. Расскажите, без каких кухонных гаджетов вы уже не представляете свою жизнь?

🔥87❤‍🔥5👀2🥰2

4 Aug 2026, 18:06 UTC395 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Паста за 15 минут Проверяем рецепт из интернета. Суть в том, что всё готовится в одной сковороде, и паста, и соус. Это гениально просто. 1. Кладем в сковороду: · феттучини · овощи и креветки (можно лосось) · соль, специи, чуть-чуть оливкового масла (у меня трюфельное) · заливаем водой 2. Включаем сильный огонь, доводим до кипения, затем убавляем до среднего. 3. Добавляем сливки (если хочется кремовой

123🔥3❤‍🔥2

4 Aug 2026, 12:29 UTC376 views25 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

А вот и салфеточки нашлись для итальянского обеда. Пойду приготовлю пасту, пожалуй. Нашла: у kokohometextiles

12🔥6❤‍🔥4👍3

4 Aug 2026, 06:28 UTC401 views26 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Добавить индивидуальности сервировке можно буквально одним штрихом, превратив скатерть в холст. Раздайте гостям маркеры или краски и проявляйте фантазию. Специальные навыки не потребуются, только настроение.

11❤‍🔥7🔥7👏1

3 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTC402 viewsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Сколько получилось?

  1. 760014%
  2. 590025%
  3. 123003%
  4. 119953%
  5. 98005%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Aug 2026, 12:18 UTC423 views43 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Недавно была на детском Дне рождения и моя гениальная подруга, она же мама именинника, сама нарисовала вазы и цветы для севировки.. Да, так можно было! Берите на заметку. Маленький секрет: чтобы они стояли, внутри находится бутылка воды Еще на столе 3 белых простыни вместо скатертей, маркеры (подписывать стаканчики и рисовать на столе), одноразовая посуда с запасом на 28 человек. Угадаете стоимость такого декора?

19🔥15🥰7👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @decoriruy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTCAnonymous Quiz96 voters

Сколько получилось?

  1. 760014%
  2. 590025%
  3. 123003%
  4. 119953%
  5. 98005%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 787,392 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ДЕКОРИРУЙ” (@decoriruy), 4,824 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/decoriruy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.