Posted without readable text
❤6🎉4

Channel
@decimal_en
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
6,120subscribers
-61 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001372847111 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @decimal_en |
| Created | 14 June 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/decimal_en |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:53 | 6,120 | -15 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 6,135 | -11 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:38 | 6,146 | -15 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:27 | 6,161 | -8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 6,169 | -11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:06 | 6,180 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:30 | 6,181 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:24 | 6,181 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (4 November 2024 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 969 |
| Reactions total | 21 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
138 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 47 | 34.1% | |
| 👍 | 36 | 26.1% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 15.9% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 5.07% | |
| 🤝 | 7 | 5.07% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 4.35% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 2.90% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 2.17% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 2.17% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 1.45% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.725% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 138reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 November 2024 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
❤6🎉4
"Who lowered the APR?" — one of the most common questions in the community. 📌 Short answer: no one did it manually. In DecimalChain, APR is calculated by the network itself — it depends on emission, total staking volume, and validator performance. The stake has grown since 2020, so rewards are now distributed among more coins. That is how the reward model works as the network grows. Full breakdown — who "changes" t…
👍3🔥2👏1🤔1
📈 Why the fee shows a different amount of DEL after the update After the update, the network shows a different amount of DEL in the fee. In USD the operation costs the same — just a few cents. The fee in Decimal is pegged to USD, and at the moment of sending it is converted to DEL at the oracle rate. You see the exact number in the fee preview before confirming. The oracle used to rely on an inflated DEL price, so…
❤2👍1🔥1
✅ Decimal network successfully updated, all core services are back online. What has changed in this update For all users: ● Rebase. We removed three zeros from DEL: the recalculation was done at a 1000:1 ratio. Prices and amounts are now easier to read, and your share in the network has not changed, only the display scale did. ● Predictable fees. The fee oracle is live: gas cost automatically adjusts to the DEL rat…
👍2❤1
🛠 Decimal network upgrade begins Today, July 6, at 13:00 MSK, the Decimal blockchain temporarily pauses for a scheduled network upgrade. ⏳ It will take approximately 2–3 days. During this time the network is fully unavailable: transactions, staking, wallet, Explorer and Console won't work. Your funds are safe — access returns as soon as the upgrade is complete. The upgrade includes: rebase 1000:1 (removing three z…
🔥1
⚙ Big Decimal Update — July 6–7 We're rolling out one of the network's most extensive updates in a long while: changes to the blockchain core, the infrastructure, and user-facing products. Here's the essential rundown. ⚙️ Network core 1️⃣ Rebase. We're removing three or four zeros from DEL (the exact ratio will be announced during the July 5 live session, after the discussion). Details in our rebase research. 2️⃣…
🙏3
🔴 URGENT. Important for everyone who has deployed smart contracts on Decimal On July 6, a major upgrade is scheduled on the Decimal network, including a rebase. We are reaching out to everyone who has deployed smart contracts on the Decimal network. To carry out the upgrade correctly, we need to account for every deployed contract. We ask everyone who has deployed contracts — for both active and inactive projects —…
👍3🤝1
📈 The moment has come when we are consciously looking at a DEL rebase. We have prepared a large economic study and are sharing it now — the weekend is a good time to read it carefully. Inside: calculations, scenarios, and the impact on users, exchanges, liquidity, and the technical side. We are exploring this option and studying the question in detail. ❗️Take time to read it this weekend. The community's opinion r…
🔥6👍2🤩2
Decimal network update: solving the problem of steak divergence Dear users of Decimal network! We would like to share important information about the recent work done to improve the stability and correctness of our network. As you know, as part of the Decimal network migration, we moved most of the functionality to smart contracts, leaving the modules responsible for nodes and rewards in Cosmos, but ensuring their…
❤8🔥5👍1
🔧 DecimalChain — Two Powerful Releases in Two Weeks The DecimalChain team is keeping up the momentum: over the past two weeks, we’ve delivered two consecutive releases — each one a solid step forward in usability, speed, and transparency for our network users. Here’s what’s new: ✅ Live Richlist in the Explorer A full list of addresses with the highest balances has been added. *Note:* Some large addresses are still…
❤7
🔔 Updates in DecimalChain: improvements in console and browser Dear Decimal users! We are pleased to announce a series of improvements to the Console interfaces, aimed at increasing transparency, convenience and control over assets in the DecimalChain network. ➡️ What's New: 🧾 Display of real addresses Transaction tables now display sender and receiver addresses instead of null values. This makes it easier to ver…
❤3👍1👏1🔥1
📈 Announcement from the Decimal Team Dear members of the Decimal community, we are pleased to announce that we are in the final stage of major network updates. Over the past two months, we have achieved significant progress: 🔸Restored the archive node for full access to transaction history; 🔸Optimized validator operations through state sync; 🔸Improved SDK and stabilized token conversion; 🔸Significantly optimized ga…
❤2👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @decimal_en. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Decimalchain |
|---|---|
| Description | Blockchain, liquid token constructor. |
| X / Twitter | @DecimalChain |
| YouTube | UCIw9u4WWIU3x6qrtqkg81MA |
| Official site | https://decimalchain.com/ |
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DecimalChain” (@decimal_en), 6,120 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/decimal_en.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.