Channel
@deceiveMiao
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
722subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001526073719 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @deceiveMiao |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/deceiveMiao |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 722 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:51 | 726 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:05 | 727 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:20 | 727 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (23 June 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 96 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 02:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 东南亚曝光新闻 📢 东南亚时报|柬埔寨大事件|爆料|吃瓜 📢 【柬埔寨】新闻吃瓜 📢 东南亚悬赏曝光 📢 Ⓜ麻豆国产剧情看片 📢 东南亚新闻吃瓜（世界杯） 📢 缅北吃瓜社 📢 缅北老街吃瓜中心 📢 |缅甸|今日头条 |爆料 📢 东南亚通缉令悬赏吃瓜 ------------------------------ ☁️ 互推入口：@sooo
下面再爆光了一名敲诈狗 敲诈狗 @tcm66 此人是专门搞色情敲诈的,找频道主接广告，连频道主都敲诈 此人真是下流下贱全家人，迟早都会死光,现在在这里到处曝光别人,迟早有一天他家里女性全部下面流脓发臭,专门敲诈国人的这个狗杂种,挣的钱都是一些非常非常脏的钱，敲诈勒索来的,花了这些钱，他会手脚全断,出门会被车撞成肉泥
@ghjgh4787 @xiximituo @pindaoyunkefu @longge8866 @xiaoxiaozhiyi @HDGG336 @shandongxiaohongjiang @fenyun @buoubuer @wczgsjthl 这是经过我这几天潜伏发现的骗子名单，有广告商和同行的，备注一下哈，不信邪的可以试试。尤其是倒数第三个
大家请注意,我曝光一名骗子，正是在这个群里到处说别人骗的那个 骗子是此人 @fenyun 因为之前这个骗子，拿别人的频道冒充卖频道骗了好几百U
https://t.me/soso?start=boost_deceiveMiao_1764232952 ⚡️ 帮「骗🕳子！曝光」助力一下 点开 SOSO 即可完成，更多助力有助于获得更多搜索曝光。
假的 okpay 😋 大家注意辨别！
【提防诈骗】Telegram用户防骗手册 ———————如果你在电报上收到一条陌生私信，它99%是个骗子 亲爱的用户， 在Telegram上进行交流和信息获取时，安全是首要的。我们特此编写了一份防骗指南，以帮助你避免可能的网络诈骗： 隐私设置：我们强烈建议你在Telegram的隐私设置中将手机号码设为所有人不可见，并在添加新好友时取消勾选“分享我的电话号码”，以防止个人信息泄露。 信息来源验证：请注意，有人可能会冒充你的亲友，通过仿造他们的头像和昵称来进行诈骗。在转账或分享重要信息前，务必确认对方的身份。 保护个人信息：请不要向他人透露包括密码、银行账号、身份证号等个人敏感信息。 谨慎进行虚拟货币交易：电报上的虚拟货币交易充斥着诈骗行为，尤其是买卖黑U的交易，你需要保持高度警惕。 谨慎点击文件：请谨慎对待电报上的文件，避免点击可能含有木马病毒的文件，特别是中文包和汉化电报的文件全是病毒。 避免频繁私信：过于频繁地…
#网友投稿：此前财通金泽金湾负责人胡达，业内人称胡达，手握金湾、金泽多个项目，操盘日股、港股、韩股、新加坡市场，属于财通大盘总。 当初园区被清查，多次辗转搬迁，一众兄弟始终跟随，毫无怨言。后续安排迁至财通开元酒店，当时多方承诺此地安全，多方保证一切稳妥。可入驻没多久，全员被宪兵抓捕。 事发前信誓旦旦承诺会出面协调、全力救人，我当时还心存期待，直至被送往机场，最终承诺全部落空。结果只能自行承担后果，律师费、罚款全部自掏腰包，落得监视居住，行动处处受限，饱受各方非议，生活陷入绝境。 当初口头许诺的安置补偿、后续保障无一兑现，所有重担全部压在我们底层人员身上。如今我已经走投无路，被逼到绝境。 我手上掌握：后勤老莫、小黑；香港总监老向、金水、锦翔、金火；财务琪琪等一众核心人员照片，还有他们骗的一些客户资料，那个业务员骗多少，骗的那个客户，只要数额庞大的我都持有，之前办公室装有监控，监控我有录制视频，到时候一一公布 原金泽园区骨干…
#越南新闻 特大跨境网络赌球团伙被捣毁！35人被公诉拘留，涉案金额超5000亿越南盾 2026年8月1日，胡志明市公安调查机关发布案情通报，警方成功破获大型跨境网络赌球犯罪集团，35名涉案人员已被提起公诉并依法临时拘留。该团伙借助Bong88.com平台，搭建超级总代理、代理、会员多层运营体系，瞄准2026世界杯等国际足球赛事招揽民众参与投注。团伙运用积分折算赌资的运作模式，每周通过银行转账、现金完成资金结算，自4月起累计涉案金额突破5000亿越南盾。本次专案由市级公安牵头统筹，联动多地警力开展侦查，案件后续调查工作仍在进行。 网络赌球属于严重违法犯罪，不法分子依靠分级代理大肆发展参赌人员，极易致使参与者蒙受重大财产损失，摧毁家庭经济。提醒民众认清赌球暗藏的圈套，主动抵制一切线上赌博投注，若发现相关违法线索，及时向公安机关举报。
#网友爆料：金边扶手陆陆被指涉嫌设局“钓鱼”，多人提醒提高警惕。 她和一个中国男的联合缉Du局一起钓鱼做局，专门坑害身边的朋友以及诱骗别人上钩，然后通过钓鱼被抓来获取提成。 据了解，此女本人也涉及贩DU。听说她在 7 月份因自身原因被抓后，选择配合缉DU局进行钓鱼，目前已经有不少人被她坑害，其中很多都是大家共同认识的朋友。这一次，也是被她和那个中国男的一起设局钓出来，导致大家总损失数万美金罚款，最低的 4000 美金，最高达到 1 万多美金。 在此提醒在金边的各位朋友，如有认识此女的，请务必远离，提高警惕，注意自身安全。如今赚钱本就困难，还要防范被这样的人坑害。
#国内资讯：海口“富婆”人设诈骗熟人圈，20余人被骗后她彻底失联。 海口一女子崔某娟以熟人圈层诈骗的方式，两年间诈骗20余人，单人损失最高达32万元。 崔某娟长期营造“富家女”人设：展示豪车、高端消费，吹嘘自己同时经营机票代购、典当投资等暴利项目，甚至带受害人回广东老家“参观家族产业”来坐实人设。 她对外承诺月收益率6.5%的“保本保息”投资，前期少量返利骗人追加投入，待资金积累到一定程度后直接失联。其骗取的巨额资金并未投入任何投资渠道，全部用于个人挥霍。 目前案件已进入审查起诉阶段，检方正全力推进追赃挽损。
#网友曝光：充电宝采集数据项目连环收费，交钱后直接失联。 骗子打着充电宝采集数据项目的旗号，声称采集一条数据能赚20元到50元。刚开始只让交750元设备押金，等受害者上钩后，又追加220U机器人激活费、320U机器人租赁费，最后再要求缴纳4100元设备私密发货保证金。 钱一步步交进去，承诺的设备单号却迟迟不给，最后直接拉黑删除。所谓项目群里的人也都是配合演戏的托，目的就是制造赚钱假象，让人不断掏钱。
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @deceiveMiao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,284,005 of 1,604,161entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“骗🕳子！曝光” (@deceiveMiao), 722 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/deceiveMiao.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.