Channel
@deccontr
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
24subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002947526231 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @deccontr |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 14 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/deccontr |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 24 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 24 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
117 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5348113231397283949 | 19 | 16.2% | |
| custom 5188308626573386448 | 16 | 13.7% | |
| custom 5188663545490858074 | 13 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5287321559915063372 | 13 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5190938456523564465 | 12 | 10.3% | |
| custom 5287500694411045630 | 10 | 8.55% | |
| custom 5188588430807820169 | 9 | 7.69% | |
| custom 5190573032116075495 | 8 | 6.84% | |
| custom 5409211610789074246 | 7 | 5.98% | |
| custom 5204462110242783830 | 6 | 5.13% | |
| custom 5188283788777515249 | 4 | 3.42% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 October 2025 to 10 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 а у кого это сегодня день рождения? да вот же он! @Aspenkills наша гордость, наша радость, наша правая рука, учитель, психолог, пубертатник и просто любимый главный администратор, который стал для нас домом.🩸 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 аспен, от всей души поздравляю тебя с днём рождения! желаю, чтобы каждый день приносил тебе радость, вдохновение и новые достижения. пусть все твои мечты сбываются, а жизнь радует прият…
🌟 ⬜ 🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Упс... #видеоdecontracte
custom 51886635454908580741
⬜
🌟 ⬜ 🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Все именно так и есть.. #видеоdecontracte
custom 51883086265733864482custom 51885884308078201692custom 51886635454908580742custom 52875006944110456301
⬜
🌟 ⬜ 🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 #видеоdecontracte
custom 51883086265733864482custom 51885884308078201692custom 52873215599150633722custom 52875006944110456302custom 53481132313972839492custom 54092116107890742462custom 51909384565235644651
⬜
🌟 ⬜ 🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 По факту Целуем ручки нашего ахуеного алкашика Шеня
custom 51885884308078201692custom 51886635454908580742custom 51905730321160754952custom 51909384565235644651
⬜
🌟 ⬜ 🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Ну я на коленях 🤩 Целуем ручки Киара.
custom 52875006944110456303custom 53481132313972839493custom 54092116107890742463
⬜
🌟 ⬜ 🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 целуем щечки и губки нашего любимого Шенюшки!
custom 51882837887775152493custom 51883086265733864483custom 51885884308078201693custom 51886635454908580742custom 52873215599150633722custom 53481132313972839492custom 54092116107890742462custom 52044621102427838301
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @deccontr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 959,619 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@deccontr named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐃𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐞.” (@deccontr), 24 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/deccontr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.