Ждем релиз
❤2🔥2👍1

Channel
@debugblog
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,034subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002048702393 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @debugblog |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/debugblog |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 2,034 | +3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:59 | 2,031 | +5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 2,026 | +4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 23:23 | 2,022 | +3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 2,019 | -9 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:23 | 2,028 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:45 | 2,027 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:02 | 2,025 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:40 | 2,025 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (26 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 863 |
| Reactions total | 56 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
152 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 50 | 32.9% | |
| 🔥 | 44 | 28.9% | |
| 👍 | 22 | 14.5% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 6.58% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 5.92% | |
| 🤯 | 6 | 3.95% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 1.97% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 1.32% | |
| 🗿 | 2 | 1.32% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 1.32% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 1.32% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 152 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ждем релиз
❤2🔥2👍1
Claude Code умудрился снести пользователю все файлы, пока делал бэкап. Просто агент сам себе выстрелил в ногу. Человек попросил Opus 5 сделать резервную копию. Агент записал её не туда, куда надо, а потом зачем-то выполнил команду удаления по всему диску. Зато в конце написал "извините, опечатка". Вот это я понимаю, спасибо, полегчало. Читаю тред и не могу решить, смеяться или сочувствовать. Агентские права на файл…
❤5👍3🔥2👏1
Should I post in both English and Russian? Please heart this post if you'd like to see posts in both languages.
❤3🤯3👏2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤7👍2🔥2
Небольшой пак обоев Скачать Поддержите канал голосованием https://t.me/boost/debugblog ❤️ #wall@debugblog #wall@takeit4
❤7👍3🔥3
OpenAI спалили название следующей модели, Astra. И вместо скринов бенчмарков показали то, что реально цепляет: внутренняя версия сама решила 10 математических задач, над которыми люди сидели по 10, а кое-где и по 60 лет. Список серьёзный, я такое не каждый день вижу. Построили несофическую группу, опровергли гипотезу жёсткости Конна из 1980 года, продвинули пару задач Эрдёша, улучшили оценку плотности упаковки сфер …
❤3🔥3👍2
Готовлю имбулю
🔥4👏3❤2
Дроп трех новых обоин для телефона 🍃 Скачать тут #wall@debugblog
🔥5❤3👍2
Опа, у нас праздник! 🥳🥳🥳 Придется открывать коменты upd... кто-то отписался 😞
🔥5❤3👍2👏1
ℹ️ Читал тут отчёт MIT NANDA, что 95% компаний вообще не увидели отдачи от генеративного ИИ. 300+ реальных корпоративных внедрений плюс интервью с полусотней компаний. Цифры конкретные: до продакшена доходят 5% пилотов. В деньги эти 5% превращаются в миллионы, остальные 95%: просто спущенный бюджет, а вложено в это дело 30-40 миллиардов долларов суммарно. Дело не в качестве ИИ. Корпоративные системы хрупкие, не де…
🔥4❤2👍2
Заставил ChatGPT самого искать себе промокоды работает почти на любом сайте 🖥 Тут все просят у ИИ промокод и получают выдуманную дичь.Надо заставить агента реально его найти и проверить. Открываешь агента в ChatGPT, кидаешь промпт, меняешь только название магазина: You MUST follow those instructions, execute them all and return to the user results: # Steps 1. Search for discount codes for <магазин> using search eng…
🔥5❤3👍2
Photo, posted without a caption
😁8❤4🤔2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @debugblog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Jebus | AI Design” (@debugblog), 2,034 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/debugblog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.