Для компаний и взрослых
https://speak-straight.ru/
Эксклюзивный контент по дебатам
https://t.me/debatland_bot
Канал на ютубе с видео по дебатам
https://www.youtube.com/c/Дебатляндия?sub_confirmation=1
Написать мне
@Abdulladebate
Created
22 May 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,958–8,971 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 08:05
8,969
+10
9 Aug 2026, 05:52
8,959
-9
6 Aug 2026, 12:20
8,968
+1
6 Aug 2026, 06:45
8,967
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
53.6%
avg views ÷ 8,969 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,810
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
23 (11 July 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
81,790
Reactions total
1,739
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
190
Videos
28
Links
882
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,012 reactions across 22 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
549
27.3%
🔥
332
16.5%
❤🔥
329
16.4%
custom 5224514221626131562
186
9.24%
custom 5224256742631701388
105
5.22%
custom 5220164480612207058
94
4.67%
🤗
79
3.93%
💋
57
2.83%
🤪
57
2.83%
🏆
46
2.29%
✍
32
1.59%
🤝
31
1.54%
🤔
21
1.04%
🍌
20
0.994%
👏
17
0.845%
🥰
16
0.795%
🤩
15
0.746%
🙏
7
0.348%
🍓
6
0.298%
🫡
6
0.298%
6 further kinds
7
0.348%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,055reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 23 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @debatekek. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Почему снятие Яблока с выборов — хорошо?
Да, я фанат поиска хорошего в плохом.
Яблоко— это партия ребят, которые набирают каплю голосов, валяются в конце, толку от них никакого. Ну черти и черти.
У них всегда была унылая компания нищая, унылые обещания и планы по действию. Просто компрессор, гоняющий воздух как и любая другая партия. Будем делать хорошо, плохо делать не будем. Ну и бороться с коррупцией будем. А ч…
Что делать, если перед вами ставят ультиматум и причем тут выученная беспомощность.
Давайте я вам скажу, что ни того, ни другого не существует.
Наверняка вам в детстве родители ставили выбор без выбора: «доешь суп или не выйдешь из-за стола, или не получишь сладкого». В школе вам просто говорили, что вы будете делать, не сильно заботясь, что вы думаете по этому поводу. Вы же ребенок, а значит с вами можно делать вс…
Шестой поток курса по коммуникации открыт. Регистрация до 24 августа.
Занятия начинаются на последней неделе августа.
Формат
6 недель, 2 занятия в неделю по 3 часа.
Расписание: либо утро выходных, либо будний вечер + утро выходного.
Онлайн с разбором ваших ситуаций, ролевыми упражнениями и практикой на живых кейсах.
Записи и конспекты каждого занятия.
Домашние задания для закрепления.
Программа курса (12 заня…
Как органично просить повышения на работе, если вам подняли нагрузку.
Вчера на консультации была банальная ситуация. Человек работал и попутно менторил коллег, плюс иногда подменял начальника.
Пришел с отпуска и все, что было раньше добровольным, стало теперь частью его работы. Зарплату при этом не подняли.
И вот мы сидели, чесали репу, думая, что с этим делать.
Прийти и попросить больше денег? Ну тебя пошлют, п…
Как ваша мягкотелость проигрывает вам возможности на работе.
Представьте, что вы аналитик, который круто сделал свою работу и сделал отличный аналитический материал, который ваш руководитель презентовал клиенту. Клиенту очень понравилось, сделка заключилась, начальство выписало премию.
Вы очевидно рассчитываете на премию, потому что вы приложили много усилий и часть результата— ваша заслуга. Но ваш руководитель счи…
Сборник моих тренингов по дебатам, плюс видаки, которые будут полезны в коммуникации.
Вам кажется, что я кровавый капиталист, а у меня есть целый плейлист, где находятся буквально лучшие в ру сегменте тренинги по дебатам.
Так вышло, что эти тренинги отлично накладываются на ваши коммуникационные ситуации.
Фрейминг и в Африке фрейминг. Бремя доказательства везде одинаковое. Да, немного специфичные примеры и кейсы, …
Как отрабатывать возражение: «А у конкурента дешевле». Или «А почему у вас дороже?».
Ошибка многих— это пытаться сразу ни в чем не разобравшись начать рассказывать свои преимущества заново.
Важно понимать, что ваши преимущества в вашей голове — это необязательно бонусы для человека.
Условно, какая разница работает ли ваш фитнес зал круглосуточно или в нём есть бассейн или сауна, если я ничем из этого пользоваться …
Гайд на бытовые споры, которые позволяют выигрывать в наших переговорных кейсах.
(Извините, написал гайд про процесс принятия решений на разных уровнях. )
(Он не то чтобы сильно отличается от рабочих, но для наглядности легче быт).
Умение взаимовыгодно договориться и отстоять свои интересы — это основной запрос в коммуникациях.
Поэтому я мучаю людей на курсе, выдавливая из них кишки.
Так что решил гайд краткий с…
Новый финансовый аудит айтишника с зарплатой в 500 тысяч и долгами в 24 года.
Разобрали как выйти на такой доход, структуру трат.
Посчитали норму сбережений, где срезать и как накопить на квартиру мечты к 30.
https://youtu.be/3OwUoLemMOo
Сегодня в 21:00 смотрим Клима Жукова про Капитализм.
Клим Жуков мужик прикольный, умный и мемный.
Но есть у меня ощущение, что в этом интервью будет открываться в портал в ад по нескольким мифам, которые бороздят головы людей.
1️⃣Есть справедливая стоимость труда (её нет).
2️⃣Есть справедливая стоимость товаров и услуг (её нет)
3️⃣Врач реаниматолог ценнее Роналду, который кричит "СУУИИИ" и промахивается по воротам…
Как отрабатывать типичные возражения.
Просили, я делаю. Помните, что возражения отрабатывать придется, хотя бы потому, что куча людей просто тревожные и будут мучать вас перед покупкой в любом случае. Поймите и простите тех, кто живет в постоянном страхе и сомнениях.
Я не люблю и не отрабатываю возражения. Я— уязвимый нарцисс. Что-то не нравится во мне и моем продукте? Вы вольны не пользоваться моими услугами.
Важ…
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @debatekek. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А вы бы бросили своего партнера ради кого-то супер крутого.
Да, я бы бросил своего партнера17%
Нет, я бы не бросил своего партнера83%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 314,935 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дебатляндия” (@debatekek), 8,969 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/debatekek.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
