Posted without readable text
🏆25🤔8🤯5🤪2custom 52201644806122070582⚡1🫡1

Channel
@debatekek
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
9,475subscribers
+508 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001366762080 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @debatekek |
| Description | Научиться дебатам и решению конфликтов. https://debateland.ru/ Учет финансов и курс по управлению личными финансами https://easy-budget.ru/ Юпуп https://www.youtube.com/c/Дебатляндия Написать мне (если важно)— @Abdulladebate |
| Created | 22 May 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/debatekek |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Nov 2026, 23:05 | 9,475 | +7 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 13:56 | 9,468 | +9 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 08:05 | 9,459 | +5 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 02:27 | 9,454 | +29 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 21:58 | 9,425 | +26 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 11:51 | 9,399 | +6 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 11:10 | 9,393 | +19 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 18:56 | 9,374 | +31 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 16:06 | 9,343 | +20 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 20:57 | 9,323 | +33 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 18:59 | 9,290 | +23 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 20:59 | 9,267 | +35 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 06:54 | 9,232 | +51 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 13:38 | 9,181 | +56 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 03:56 | 9,125 | +29 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 01:19 | 9,096 | +30 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:18 | 9,066 | +16 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:39 | 9,050 | +9 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:43 | 9,041 | +7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:44 | 9,034 | first reading |
55 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 55 (11 July 2026 – 14 November 2026) |
| Views total | 68,780 |
| Reactions total | 1,020 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Nov 2026, 12:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5,200 reactions across 54 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1,607 | 30.9% | |
| 🔥 | 713 | 13.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 591 | 11.4% | |
| custom 5224514221626131562 | 393 | 7.56% | |
| 🏆 | 288 | 5.54% | |
| custom 5220164480612207058 | 206 | 3.96% | |
| 🥰 | 200 | 3.85% | |
| 👏 | 177 | 3.40% | |
| custom 5224256742631701388 | 167 | 3.21% | |
| 😍 | 165 | 3.17% | |
| 🤪 | 97 | 1.87% | |
| ✍ | 88 | 1.69% | |
| 🤗 | 80 | 1.54% | |
| 💋 | 69 | 1.33% | |
| 🙏 | 58 | 1.12% | |
| 🤔 | 53 | 1.02% | |
| 🌭 | 43 | 0.827% | |
| 🤩 | 41 | 0.788% | |
| 🍌 | 36 | 0.692% | |
| 🤝 | 33 | 0.635% | |
| 11 further kinds | 95 | 1.83% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,243 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @debatekek. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 55 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 July 2026 to 14 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (7.69%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Posted without readable text
🏆25🤔8🤯5🤪2custom 52201644806122070582⚡1🫡1
А как бы вы помогли отстоять удаленку? В этом посте вводная, а потом я расскажу стратегию, которую мы построили, что дала результат лучше ожидаемого. Вводная: Недавно одному моему знакомому, который играл в дебаты, новый начальник решил отменить удаленку. Новый начальник из Москвы и всех перевозил в Москву. Чубрик из Питера и движения в сторону Москвы были крайне нежелательными, учитывая, что все это время ни у …
custom 522016448061220705826🏆12custom 52242567426317013887
Как спорить с главой секты на примере дебатов Назарова, которые смотрели на стриме. Я делал такой же разбор дебатов Маркаряна и Соболева давно, принцип не поменялся. Я не говорю, что у них там секты, но для наглядности разберем на этом примере. А завтра, думаю, посмотрим разбор Яндекса. Тоже же секта. Основная ошибка— это нападать на личность сектовода. Нападение на него— это нападение на адепта. Адепт своей личнос…
👍41custom 52201644806122070587🤪5🔥3😍1
Начинаем смотреть интервью с Иноагентом Кацем. Залетайте. Антона Назарова смотреть закончили https://youtube.com/live/wGhCIWGalC0?feature=share
👍9custom 52201644806122070584💋3❤🔥1
Устроил тестовые дебаты между Клодом и Чатом ЖПТ про смертную казнь, и это было прямо плохо. Да, дебаты между машинами были сильно лучше, чем если бы их делали обыватели. Обыватель во всём уступает машине, кроме как за гроши таскать на своём горбу коробки в ПВЗ или ходить со шваброй по вкусу толчка. Слава богу, там уже появляются автоматические полотёры. Обыватели не способны удерживать в голове столько информации,…
custom 522425674263170138829👍18custom 52201644806122070586🔥4⚡1🏆1🤔1
Почему конфликты глубже чем вы думаете, и как пользоваться пирамидой конфликта? Как обычно бывает в жизни. Один партнёр говорит (Скорее всего, женщина): — Ты опять оставил грязную посуду. Я что, должна за всеми убирать? Второй отвечает (Чаще всего, мужичок): — Ну помой, если тебе так мешает. Я же не заставляю тебя. (К слову, это буквально как я себя вел. Не нравится, что дома грязно? Убери. Теперь я живу один в…
✍51❤🔥26🔥11custom 52242567426317013888custom 52245142216261315626custom 52201644806122070583👍2👏2
Объясню на стриме сегодня в 21:00 как купить квартиру, разбирая видачок, где вас опять пытаются убедить, что вы не сможете её купить. Я уже и пост писал. И материал на 9 страниц делали. Видео записал, где всё посчитал. Но хныкать в комментах и по жизни сильно проще, чем взять калькулятор в руку и посчитать. А потом буду играть в игру, где надо управлять бюджетом и выйти из бедноты. Возьму себе выпускника детдома ил…
👍20custom 522451422162613156210🤪4🔥2custom 52201644806122070582❤🔥1
Смотрим Зубаревич сегодня в 21:00 на стриме. Как всегда будем воспринимать тяжесть бытия на себе. Потом либо смотрим Влада Савельева, либо играем в старые игры на компуктере. https://youtube.com/live/1oECiXwQhbY?feature=share
👍18🤔6🔥2😱1
Posted without readable text
🙏42🔥16👍10🤩5🏆3🤔2🥰2👏1
Написал 20 статей в блог по манипуляциям в общении в быту и в работе. Переговоры, споры или дебаты — это очень часто набор стратегических векторов и тактических инструментов. У многих нет ни того, ни другого. Поэтому у вас проблемы и возникают. А еще в переговорных боях надо ловить приемы оппонента и указывать на них. А как вы на них укажете, если вы их не знаете и не понимаете?) Поэтому многие и просили оцифроват…
❤🔥81custom 522451422162613156211🤪6🌭4🍓2🏆2👍1💋1
Бесплатный тренажер для переговоров с живыми людьми, сделанный мной. Все же давно хотели, чтобы было круто, полезно, а главное бесплатно. Ну вот, держите. Никаких обманов, нагревов мамонтов. Вы буквально можете спаринговаться с другими людьми в переговорах бесплатно. Что надо делать? 1️⃣Заходите ко мне на площадку. https://debateland.ru/play 2️⃣Выбираете ситуацию. Там 30 бытовых и 20 рабочих кейсов. Есть про …
🥰58👏27custom 52245142216261315629🔥6❤🔥5✍3
Снял видак про доступность жилья. Блогеры в один голос говорят, что жильё стало абсолютно недоступным, что зумеры навсегда рабы аренды, а люди моего поколения будут копить на квартиру всю жизнь. Так вот, это статистическая ложь, и я решил не просто спорить, а посчитать. Мы с ребятами подняли архивы с 2010 года по зарплатам, по ценам на жильё, по ипотечным ставкам и по средним платежам. Всё взяли из Росстата, публи…
👍41custom 522451422162613156214🫡3🤪2👏1🔥1custom 52201644806122070581
Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @debatekek. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
We recorded 1 post on @debatekek as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А вы бы бросили своего партнера ради кого-то супер крутого.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 14 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дебатляндия” (@debatekek), 9,475 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/debatekek.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.