Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Дорогой Зенит

@dearzenit

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,323subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001269963896
TypeChannel
Username@dearzenit
Created24 July 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dearzenit

Growth

1,3231,3251,3246 August 2026 — 1,325 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,325 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,323 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,323–1,325 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:551,323-2
6 Aug 2026, 08:041,325no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:561,325first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.2%
avg views ÷ 1,323 subscribers
Avg views / post
599
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held20 (14 July 20263 August 2026)
Views total9,578
Reactions total97
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 18:23 UTC≈361 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Спартак, Динамо, Семак, Карпукас, Обо всём Орлов нам расскажет сейчас. С какой интонацией и в каком ритме прочитали? Ладно, а теперь - о футболе. Оказывается, Глушенков - на сопротивлении. Театральные термины в 382 выпуске программы «Такой футбол» после 22:55 здесь https://vkvideo.ru/video-226927757_456239206 @dearzenit

3 Aug 2026, 10:24 UTC≈382 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Возьмём на заметку. Нюансы понятны: турнир, соперник, дисциплина, но всё же. @dearzenit

2 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC≈406 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

С победой, СБГ! Два вопроса: 1. какие у вас опасения после таких двух туров? 2. Что делать Андрею Мостовому? Хорошо: С Андреем Мостовым. @dearzenit

1 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC≈447 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Восьмой сезон вместе! Телеканал «Санкт-Петербург» продолжит транслировать матчи «Зенита» в новом сезон РПЛ. Ближайшие эфир уже завтра из Оренбурга, начало в 18:10. https://tvspb.ru/live В понедельник обсудим всё в «Таком футболе», возвращаемся из четырёхнедельного отпуска. @dearzenit

31 Jul 2026, 15:52 UTC≈476 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

А теперь - о футболе… Пара спорных прогнозов есть, но почему бы не попробовать? Ахмат не проиграет, крылья тоже готовы и могут. После 8 матчей здесь 1 угаданный результат и 4 исхода. Родина - Ростов 1:1 Акрон - Рубин 2:2 ЦСКА - Крылья 2:1 Динамо Мх - Локо 1:1 Балтика - Динамо 1:2 Оренбург - Зенит 1:3 Краснодар - Факел 4:1 Ахмат - Спартак 2:2 Что по нашему чемпионату? Проигнорировал Кругового, как и атаку

26 Jul 2026, 19:02 UTC≈657 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Вы же знаете, что отвечать на очередные выпады про воспитанников петербургского футбола. @dearzenit

25 Jul 2026, 15:16 UTC≈668 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

С победой, СБГ! Начали, так начали. С запасом по игре, но с хорошими шансами для соперника в защите. Впрочем, а когда было иначе. @dearzenit

25 Jul 2026, 13:39 UTC≈695 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

И Тюкавин бы его не вытеснил. Просто огненные 20 минут Соболева. А я вас предупреждал - от двух мячей. @dearzenit

25 Jul 2026, 13:22 UTC≈652 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Максу, конечно, чем проще, тем сложнее забить… @dearzenit

25 Jul 2026, 13:06 UTC≈651 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ну что, победа от двух забитых. Готовы? @dearzenit

24 Jul 2026, 18:38 UTC≈619 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Талантливейший форвард Оффор. Убери офсайды, вылитый чемпион мира. @dearzenit

24 Jul 2026, 17:40 UTC≈572 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Думал, накажет Батраков, что не взял его, а тут Круговой что-то невероятное показывает… восхитительно классный пас @dearzenit

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dearzenit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дорогой Зенит” (@dearzenit), 1,323 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dearzenit.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.