Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
@toldbyangel. ♡
@dearplume
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003976877097 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dearplume |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dearplume |
Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 1 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 457.1%
- avg views ÷ 1 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 4.6
- 14 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 14
- of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (20 July 2026 – 26 July 2026) |
| Views total | 64 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 06:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 57
- Videos
- 13
- Links
- 10
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 24s
- Average length
- 12s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
@bhlythe
Sticker, posted without a caption
@bhlythe - as dedekk, dedek mau beli buku baluu. 😍
Sticker, posted without a caption
@angeIica ft. @kertias @gsoda @juhoong @bhlythe @zzuxun @juhoony. 🩷👚
i love u so muchhh dedekkk, walaupun yang 2 itu ngga beres. Tapi masih ada 1 yang lucu, tapi aku sayang kalian bertiga oke? huhuhu. ❤️❤️ @bhlythe @kertias @angeIica
Sticker, posted without a caption
SEMPIT SEMPIT😡😡 @angeIica @kertias @bhlythe
Sticker, posted without a caption
huft, honestly, i felt so intimidated. that was the very first word that popped up when i first interacted or replied to their greeting. i don’t know, their vibes was just somewhat intense in a good way, like they were just effortlessly cool. but they weren't hard to approach at all. they even used to jb-jb on my gallery posts all the time when we were freshly mutualed. and now... i don't even know what to say, just …
you're gorgeous, but in a dangerous way. it’s almost illegal huhu... to be honest, i actually hesitated to mutual you at first because your current vibe is a whole 180 from my first impression of you. i used to feel a bit shy and hesitant because you seemed so, mhm... kinda detached and nonchalant? but in a really pretty way. but honestly, now it feels so comfortable interacting with you because you’re just so soft, …
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @dearplume. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“@toldbyangel. ♡” (@dearplume), 1 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dearplume.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.