Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 东南亚‖大事件🅥吃瓜曝光

Channel

东南亚‖大事件🅥吃瓜曝光

@ddnnyy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

50,395subscribers

+10,100 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001887560425
TypeChannel
Username@ddnnyy
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ddnnyy

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

31,38050,39540,887.510 August 2026 — 40,295 subscribers10 August 2026 — 40,249 subscribers11 August 2026 — 40,226 subscribers12 August 2026 — 40,186 subscribers13 August 2026 — 39,894 subscribers14 August 2026 — 39,512 subscribers16 August 2026 — 39,295 subscribers17 August 2026 — 38,877 subscribers18 August 2026 — 38,277 subscribers19 August 2026 — 38,074 subscribers20 August 2026 — 38,055 subscribers21 August 2026 — 37,831 subscribers23 August 2026 — 37,235 subscribers24 August 2026 — 36,941 subscribers26 August 2026 — 36,671 subscribers26 August 2026 — 36,439 subscribers28 August 2026 — 36,438 subscribers28 August 2026 — 36,243 subscribers30 August 2026 — 35,850 subscribers30 August 2026 — 35,630 subscribers31 August 2026 — 35,474 subscribers1 September 2026 — 35,226 subscribers3 September 2026 — 34,700 subscribers4 September 2026 — 34,562 subscribers7 September 2026 — 34,212 subscribers10 September 2026 — 33,784 subscribers12 September 2026 — 32,901 subscribers14 September 2026 — 32,293 subscribers16 September 2026 — 31,620 subscribers18 September 2026 — 31,380 subscribers30 September 2026 — 50,395 subscribers10 August 202630 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 51 days, net +10,100. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,528–53,247 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Sept 2026, 01:1950,395+19,015
18 Sept 2026, 02:5931,380-240
16 Sept 2026, 01:0231,620-673
14 Sept 2026, 06:0132,293-608
12 Sept 2026, 16:4232,901-883
10 Sept 2026, 15:3733,784-428
7 Sept 2026, 12:5834,212-350
4 Sept 2026, 14:3934,562-138
3 Sept 2026, 02:1434,700-526
1 Sept 2026, 23:5435,226-248
31 Aug 2026, 22:3935,474-156
30 Aug 2026, 22:3735,630-220
30 Aug 2026, 01:2535,850-393
28 Aug 2026, 22:0736,243-195
28 Aug 2026, 00:4236,438-1
26 Aug 2026, 23:5236,439-232
26 Aug 2026, 00:2336,671-270
24 Aug 2026, 23:4236,941-294
23 Aug 2026, 08:0437,235-596
21 Aug 2026, 22:0537,831first reading

Engagement

631 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 81 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.01%
avg views ÷ 50,395 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,020
366 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.159%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
366
of 631 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 47 of 366 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held631 (9 August 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total739,383
Reactions total265
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Sept 2026, 22:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 25m
Average length
40s

Measured directly from 128 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

269 reactions across 47 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5821.6%
🎉5219.3%
👍4717.5%
🔥4316.0%
🤩3914.5%
👏2810.4%
⚡10.372%
🥰10.372%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 631 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 269 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 631 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Sept 2026, 14:18 UTC≈4,040 views1 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Video

#网友投稿 今天又一批人从柬埔寨撤走。这边已经没什么活路,还在扛的也早点想后路。 📣大事件频道: @ddnnyy ✅投稿/爆料: @CCC333

🔥1

29 Sept 2026, 14:02 UTC≈3,950 views1 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

#网友吐槽 今天离开柬埔寨。待了五个月,耳朵里全是失踪、绑架、跑路、被抓。 进来多半冲着赚钱,真能稳住的永远是少数,收入还不稳。现在连基本生存空间都挤,没有像样的岗位,打野也难存钱。风险大、回报不对等。 不只怕被抓,还要防警察敲诈。不敢随便跳槽换公司,怕换个坑更深。回国可能还要被问。算下来这点钱不值这个险。对少数人是机会,对多数人就是一步步往里陷。 📣大事件频道: @ddnnyy ✅投稿/爆料: @CCC333

🎉1

29 Sept 2026, 14:00 UTC≈2,690 views4 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Forwarded from @CCC333sPhoto

💎🎰🙌💵 😀💰💸💸 💳💳💳💳💳💳💳💳💳 💳💳💳💳💳💳💳💳💳 🧐专业服务 超高限红 毫秒出款 ❤️视讯 — 索莱尔/DB/CQ9高限红 ❤️电子 — PG/PP/CQ9 一注2000 ❤️彩票 — 独家综艺28/哈希区块彩 🏆OK游戏中心 公群9 入驻300万U 🏆新币担保 公群999 入驻100万U 官方网址 ➔ 9Y.COM 官方飞投 ➔ @GF9Y 官方客服 ➔ @KF9Y 官方频道 ➔ @WWW9YCOM 💎🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋💎

❤1🎉1👍1🤩1

29 Sept 2026, 13:43 UTC≈4,270 views6 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

缅甸局势:KIA联军已打到莫梅克镇口附近! 莫梅克镇一带,KIA联合部队与缅军交火激烈。缅军伤亡较重,9月29日上午出动空袭反击。 KIA方面抓获部分缅军士兵,战线推进到镇入口附近的瑞扎利村桥。联军继续前压,缅军仍在抵抗。 截至目前双方均未发官方通报。该镇此前由缅军在中方协助下从TNLA手中夺回,外围部分区域现由KIA及其联军控制。 📣大事件频道: @ddnnyy ✅投稿/爆料: @CCC333

🔥3🎉1👍1👏1

29 Sept 2026, 13:05 UTC≈3,460 views2 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

#网友投稿 #东升国际 #传奇 #老友会 东升国际、传奇、老友会这三个平台,别玩也别去居家干活。主管旺财、组长正,管理乱,跟中介一起掏公司的钱,最后让底层背锅。居家客服三分钟点一下鼠标,离职后工资从十五号拖到现在十天。要钱被威胁撤曝光。 日常被指黑客户款、杀内部、离职乱扣费,一千U工资都扣。责任全推给中介。过几天还会再曝。 📣大事件频道: @ddnnyy ✅投稿/爆料: @CCC333

👍1👏1

29 Sept 2026, 12:25 UTC≈3,880 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

#韩国资讯 2名中国女游客在济州岛遭非法拘禁、殴打及抢劫,3人被羁押、2人已离境返华! 韩国济州岛西归浦警方9月28日通报,2名20多岁的中国女游客在济州岛旅游期间,涉嫌遭5名中国籍男子非法拘禁、殴打并抢劫。目前,3名嫌疑人已被羁押,另外2人在警方接报前已乘机离开韩国、返回中国。 案件发生在9月21日下午。2名女子在西归浦市一处独栋住宿设施内被5人控制,遭到殴打并被限制人身自由,手机、平板电脑等物品被抢走,还被逼迫通过银行账户转出10万元人民币,约合2000万韩元。 9月22日下午,其中1名女子成功逃出,向住宿设施工作人员求助并报警。警方赶到后当场抓获2名嫌疑人;当晚,又在济州国际机场出境大厅截住第3名准备搭乘航班离境的男子。 另外2名嫌疑人已于当天上午乘机返回中国。韩国警方正通过国际刑警组织等渠道追查两人,并继续调查5人的具体作案经过。 有韩国媒体报道称,2名受害女子彼此认识,并经介绍前往涉案男子的住宿处。不过,警方…

29 Sept 2026, 11:43 UTC≈3,840 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

蒙多基里省联合突查边境场所 严打非法网赌与违法博彩! 近日,蒙多基里省政府联合执法部门对边境地区3处场所开展专项检查,责令其立即停止一切未经许可的非法网络赌博活动。 检查发现,其中1处已被核实停业超过3个月,1处大门紧锁、无人经营,另1处已被列入重点监控。该省副省长强调,凡未取得商业博彩管理委员会(CGMC)许可的企业,必须立即关停。 截至2026年9月,柬埔寨全国已有18家涉及电诈的赌场被吊销许可证,9家被暂停执照并接受调查,边境博彩监管正全面升级。 📣大事件频道: @ddnnyy ✅投稿/爆料: @CCC333

29 Sept 2026, 11:30 UTC≈3,310 views1 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Forwarded from @CCC333sVideo

🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 0审核|包出款🤩🤩🤩 东南亚大事件联合担保🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩(电子) 🤩亿级域名|78.COM 🤩官方飞投|充提自由 🔝实力派:78.COM 数字够短 品牌够大 🔥香港六合彩 · 独家盈利无上限! 🤩所有的特码🤩🤩倍 🤩连码三中三🤩🤩🤩倍 🤩百家乐全网最高起步返水🤩% 🤩电子|棋牌|捕鱼起步返水🤩.🤩% 🤩十三水|德州自主组队,无抽佣; 🏆电子单注🤩🤩🤩🤩U一拉; ⭐️百家乐真人视讯台红🤩🤩万U; 🚩诚招代理合作(二选一): 1、打码返佣,限指定平台; 2、占成模式,可自由选择占成比例及游戏平台; 🤩🤩🤩🤩:@DL78 💥高额战绩,巅峰记录持续刷新: 🥇PP电子|极速糖果1000 玩家游戏中购买30000u超级免费旋转,高倍爆奖,最终拿下378万U,已出款; 🥈PG电子|麻将胡了 又又又欧气爆棚,3000U一拉,连番触发,单局斩获193万U; 🥉香港六合彩|特码49倍 爱拼才会赢,大佬单码下注18万U,一注直接…

🎉1

29 Sept 2026, 11:02 UTC≈5,410 views1 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

#群友爆料 以前缅甸星河园区,星河集团老板阿富汗,外号眼镜,福建人。核心小弟经理、太子、小代(26,阿富汗小舅子),也都是福建人。 阿富汗在缅甸仍有美国精聊办公室,人多是骗招买过去的,管理叫汤姆、腾腾。妙瓦底那边被指非人折磨,又打又用防风火机烧脚底。有腾腾真实姓名,受害人员要指控可联系爆料人。 阿富汗带人做过国内韵达快杀盘,也在木牌太子园区开过新加坡精聊。新加坡盘同样大量骗招,高压殴打。旁边美国精聊盘也有人被折磨。 爆料人称汗总欠自己5000U工资,掌握阿富汗、秀才、太子、26等人照片。不结账就公开照片给当地立案。七月案子已发,偷渡、诈骗都认了,本人取保,不怕再被挂户口本。需要上述人员照片的受害者可找其领取。 📣大事件频道: @ddnnyy ✅投稿/爆料: @CCC333

🎉1

29 Sept 2026, 10:46 UTC≈5,600 views4 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

#网友投稿 金三角特区壹号公馆刚又来治安局抓人,一期四栋楼下带走一名中国人。现场仍有不少警察,行动可能还没完。这已是连续第四天清查。昨天二期抓走十多人,据说里面有一个盘总。 📣大事件频道: @ddnnyy ✅投稿/爆料: @CCC333

🎉2👍1👏1

29 Sept 2026, 10:21 UTC≈4,720 views1 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

#网友吐槽 金三角特区现在就是个现实版“杀猪盘”? 动不动就检查抓人。我们团队在治安局找了关系、交了保护费,照样照抓不误。抓进去想捞人,一个人5万人民币;不交钱,就威胁移交老挝警察。可讽刺的是,真移交老挝警察,反而3000U就能出来。 说白了,现在的特区就是现实版“杀猪盘”:你以为这里安全稳定,其实是在“养猪”,轮流杀。今天没钱了,抓一批这个团队;明天没钱了,再换另一个团队收保护费。 最后劝大家一句:赚到钱了,回特区吃喝玩乐、消费一下没问题;但想在这里搞业绩、做团队,真的不合适。 📣大事件频道: @ddnnyy ✅投稿/爆料: @CCC333

👏1

29 Sept 2026, 10:00 UTC≈1,560 views1 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Forwarded from @CCC333sPhoto

🤩🤩🤩🤩 😃UP顶流线上博彩平台大额出款无忧! 🏆综合一盘 · 精彩尽收 🏆让信息更透明·让体验更简单 🏆多元赛事 · 清晰数据 · 专业服务 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🧐一站式综合赛事服务平台,汇聚热门体育赛事与实时赛事资讯,提供清晰的赛事信息,数据展示及便捷的账户服务。简洁操作、稳定体验、专业客服,为用户打造更加安心、高效的使用体验! 💵新用户首存优惠活动: ❤️首存1000人民币赠送🤩🤩🤩 ❤️首存3000人民币赠送🤩🤩🤩 ❤️首存5000人民币赠送🤩🤩🤩 ❤️免实名 免绑卡 免手机号 ❤️首存活动请找客服专员领取 🤩🤩🤩🤩 UP.COM 🤩🤩🤩🤩 @cj16cj 🤩🤩🤩🤩 @upyl88 🤩🤩🤩🤩 @upyl99

👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 631 posts we hold for @ddnnyy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“东南亚‖大事件🅥吃瓜曝光” (@ddnnyy), 50,395 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ddnnyy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.