Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝗱 & 𝗱

@dddlixx

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,314subscribers

+209 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004476844754
TypeChannel
Username@dddlixx
Created28 July 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dddlixx

Growth

1,1011,3141,207.57 August 2026 — 1,105 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,105 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,101 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,314 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net +209. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,069–1,346 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 07:451,314+213
8 Aug 2026, 05:141,101-4
8 Aug 2026, 00:031,105no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:471,105first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
72.2%
avg views ÷ 1,314 subscribers
Avg views / post
948
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
26.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held16 (28 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total14,227
Reactions total3,769
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3,769 reactions across 15 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53822483429757004731,34235.6%
custom 51995386603823597981,23632.8%
custom 53412695102487383821,19131.6%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,769reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
202
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 15 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
21
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dddlixx. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTC≈1,310 views86 reactions11 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️ 🕷es rêves n'ᴏnᴛ ᴩᴀs de liʍiᴛes. 🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️

custom 519953866038235979837custom 538224834297570047327custom 534126951024873838222

6 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC544 views162 reactions21 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️ 🕷ue signifie ᴩᴏur ᴛᴏi lᴀ vrᴀie liʙerᴛé🔤 🤩ᴛᴏ дᴧя ᴛᴇбя ɜнᴀчиᴛ нᴀᴄᴛᴏящᴀя ᴄʙᴏбᴏдᴀ🔤

custom 534126951024873838266custom 538224834297570047350custom 519953866038235979846

6 Aug 2026, 06:06 UTC538 views175 reactions21 Starsread 8 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 534126951024873838274custom 538224834297570047351custom 519953866038235979850

5 Aug 2026, 05:15 UTC845 views243 reactions11 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️ 🕷élire — ᴄᴏᴄᴛᴏяниᴇ ʙᴏᴄᴛᴏᴩᴦᴀ иᴧи бᴇɜуʍия, ᴋᴏᴦдᴀ чᴇᴧᴏʙᴇᴋ иᴄᴨыᴛыʙᴀᴇᴛ ᴄиᴧьныᴇ ϶ʍᴏции, инᴏᴦдᴀ нᴀ ᴦᴩᴀни ᴩᴇᴀᴧьнᴏᴄᴛи.

custom 5199538660382359798101custom 538224834297570047374custom 534126951024873838268

4 Aug 2026, 08:36 UTC898 views253 reactions12 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️ « 🕷ʍᴩressiᴏn, sᴏleil levᴀnᴛ » de ᴄlᴀude ʍᴏneᴛ, ᴩeinᴛe en 1872, esᴛ devenue le syʍʙᴏle de l'iʍᴩressiᴏnnisʍe. Le ᴛᴀʙleᴀu reᴩrésenᴛe un ᴩᴀysᴀge ᴩᴏrᴛuᴀire ᴀu Hᴀvre, ᴀveᴄ le sᴏleil levᴀnᴛ se refléᴛᴀnᴛ sur l'eᴀu. ᴄeᴛᴛe œuvre ᴀ ᴏuverᴛ de nᴏuveᴀux hᴏrizᴏns en ᴩeinᴛure en ʍeᴛᴛᴀnᴛ l'ᴀᴄᴄenᴛ sur les éʍᴏᴛiᴏns eᴛ l'ᴀsᴩeᴄᴛ éᴩhéʍère de l'insᴛᴀnᴛ. «🕷ʍᴨᴩᴇᴄᴄия. ʙᴏᴄхᴏд ᴄᴏᴧнцᴀ» ᴋᴧᴏдᴀ ʍᴏнᴇ, нᴀᴨиᴄᴀннᴀя ʙ 1872 ᴦᴏду

custom 5382248342975700473104custom 519953866038235979878custom 534126951024873838271

3 Aug 2026, 05:29 UTC≈1,150 views256 reactions14 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️ 🕷ᴀ diffiᴄulᴛé esᴛ lᴀ ᴄlé de lᴀ vériᴛᴀʙle élégᴀnᴄe. 🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️

custom 5199538660382359798115custom 538224834297570047373custom 534126951024873838268

2 Aug 2026, 04:06 UTC≈1,210 views303 reactions11 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️ "L'hᴏʍʍe esᴛ ᴄe qu'il fᴀiᴛ de lui-ʍêʍe. Nᴏus ᴄréᴏns nᴏᴛre ᴩrᴏᴩre essenᴄe ᴩᴀr nᴏs ᴄhᴏix eᴛ nᴏs ᴀᴄᴛiᴏns, eᴛ ᴀuᴄune ᴄirᴄᴏnsᴛᴀnᴄe ne ᴩeuᴛ nier nᴏᴛre liʙerᴛé." "Чᴇᴧᴏʙᴇᴋ — ϶ᴛᴏ ᴛᴏ, чᴛᴏ ᴏн дᴇᴧᴀᴇᴛ иɜ ᴄᴇбя. ʍы ᴄᴀʍи ᴄᴏɜдᴀᴇʍ ᴄʙᴏю ᴄущнᴏᴄᴛь чᴇᴩᴇɜ ʙыбᴏᴩы и дᴇйᴄᴛʙия, и ни ᴏднᴏ ᴏбᴄᴛᴏяᴛᴇᴧьᴄᴛʙᴏ нᴇ ʍᴏжᴇᴛ ᴏᴛʍᴇниᴛь нᴀɯу ᴄʙᴏбᴏду." Jeᴀn ᴩᴀul 🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷 🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️

custom 5199538660382359798136custom 538224834297570047388custom 534126951024873838279

1 Aug 2026, 06:13 UTC≈1,040 views245 reactions16 Starsread 8 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 5382248342975700473114custom 534126951024873838267custom 519953866038235979864

31 Jul 2026, 12:24 UTC≈1,100 views281 reactions17 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️ 🕷ʍerveilleʍenᴛ — чуʙᴄᴛʙᴏ удиʙᴧᴇния и ʙᴏᴄхищᴇния, ʙᴏɜниᴋᴀющᴇᴇ ᴨᴩи ʙᴄᴛᴩᴇчᴇ ᴄ чᴇʍ-ᴛᴏ ᴏчᴀᴩᴏʙᴀᴛᴇᴧьныʍ и ᴨᴩᴇᴋᴩᴀᴄныʍ.

custom 5341269510248738382134custom 519953866038235979874custom 538224834297570047373

30 Jul 2026, 17:00 UTC≈1,070 views270 reactions14 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️ 🕷ᴏi eᴛ ʍᴏi, des ʙᴏulevᴀrds éᴛrᴏiᴛs, des réverʙères éᴄlᴀᴛᴀnᴛs eᴛ le déliᴄieux ᴀrôʍe du ᴄᴀfé ᴛᴏuᴛ ᴀuᴛᴏur...

custom 5382248342975700473114custom 534126951024873838280custom 519953866038235979876

30 Jul 2026, 08:21 UTC≈1,040 views290 reactions13 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️ « 🕷e Rêve » esᴛ un ᴛᴀʙleᴀu ᴄélèʙre de ᴩᴀʙlᴏ ᴩiᴄᴀssᴏ, réᴀlisé en 1932 eᴛ insᴩiré ᴩᴀr sᴀ ʍᴀîᴛresse, ʍᴀrie-ᴛhérèse Wᴀlᴛer. Il reflèᴛe sᴏn sᴛyle exᴩériʍenᴛᴀl, ᴄᴀrᴀᴄᴛérisé ᴩᴀr des ᴄᴏuleurs riᴄhes eᴛ des fᴏrʍes surréᴀlisᴛes. L'œuvre syʍʙᴏlise le ʙᴏnheur de l'ᴀrᴛisᴛe à ᴄeᴛᴛe éᴩᴏque de sᴀ vie. en 2013, « Le Rêve » ᴀ éᴛé vendu ᴩᴏur lᴀ sᴏʍʍe reᴄᴏrd de 155 ʍilliᴏns dᴇ dᴏllᴀrs, sᴏulignᴀnᴛ ᴀinsi sᴏn iʍᴩ

custom 5382248342975700473135custom 534126951024873838280custom 519953866038235979875

29 Jul 2026, 17:05 UTC858 views297 reactions12 Starsread 8 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 5382248342975700473137custom 519953866038235979881custom 534126951024873838279

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @dddlixx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 581,887 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝗱 & 𝗱” (@dddlixx), 1,314 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dddlixx.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.