Channel
@db4k_exe
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8,363subscribers
-76 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002458603611 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @db4k_exe |
| Description | Профессиональный читолог со стажем. Делаю расклад на детект, отвал скриптов, и ваш чит по гороскопу. Секретный магазинчик: @CheatSh0p_Bot Я/Сотрудничество:@Me_okinawa |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/db4k_exe |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:56 | 8,363 | -76 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:53 | 8,439 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:31 | 8,439 | first reading |
23 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (15 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 112,280 |
| Reactions total | 593 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
593 reactions across 23 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 399 | 67.3% | |
| 😁 | 104 | 17.5% | |
| 🔥 | 90 | 15.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 593reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @db4k_exe. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Среда, самое время почитерить в дотке. Продолжаем проверять доту на стрессоустойчивость в прямом эфире: ЗАЛЕТЕТЬ НА ПРОСМОТР ЗАЛЕТЕТЬ НА ПРОСМОТР ЗАЛЕТЕТЬ НА ПРОСМОТР По традиции лампово беседуем с чатиком, отвечаю на ваши вопросы, и глазеем на удачливыx в рулетке. Промокоды для всеx выжившиx - как обычно в конце стрима, а мой луз принесет вам код на 30 дней.
❤4🔥1😁1
Кс, кской, а дотка по расписанию. Между задач заглядываю на хай-ммрчик, буксуя на одном рейтинге, щупая героев под 4-5 позицию, и что я хочу вам сказать, циферные титаны - это сейчас то еще болото. Меня каждый матч кидает с игроками от 10к+ матчей, я единственный у кого так мало матчей, и так практически в 90% игр. Конечно круто смотреть на их инвентари стоимостью миллионами рублей, но одновременно не круто наблюд…
❤10🔥2
Опа, CS2 потиxоньку привстает с колен. В целом как и предсказывал, что VALVE наберут армию индусов(игроков) и они будут более активно тренить VACnet, но учитывая, как они боятся фолс-позитив репортов, они придумали некоторый барьер, который сводит нежелательные репорты тролей/читеров к минимуму. Каким образом? Если объяснять простым языком, то доступ к панели вердиктов, получают исключительно олдовые челы с кристал…
❤12🔥2😁2
Парни простите, я не мог игнорировать тренды. Не зря оперативка дорожает👨🚒
❤43😁14🔥12
Забавно видеть ролик на данную тему спустя такое длительное время. Еще во времена беты я скипнул CS 2, потому что мне никогда не вкатывало хвх/семик в мме. Это все однотипная дрочильня, которая не доставляла мне и капельки кайфа, так как я выходец из кс 1.6, где флексили навыками играть жестко по легиту, и я освоил это практически в совершенстве. Но увы, в CS 2 нет системы, где бы эти навыки пригодились. Ты будешь …
❤14😁4🔥3
Порой Deadlock меня поражает, игра позволяет делать очень забавные вещи. Ранее можно было реализовать подобие ВХ с помощью конфигов. Часть этого уже урезали, но игроки продолжают находить новые дыры, и, думаю, это будет продолжаться еще долгое время. Один из таких приколов — анлок камеры, который позволяет обманывать противников: наносить удары в ограничения углов механик игры или кидать скиллы спиной. Реализовать…
❤8😁4🔥2
☂️ | Читы для кастомок После создания первого скрипта для Custom Hero Chaos, который наделал не мало шуму, ребята решили продолжить двигаться в этом направлении, помогая вам упростить процесс поиска нужных вещей, а именно — дампов самой кастомки. Для чего нужен этот дамп? Для анализа, и нахождения тех самых дыр, за счет которых в дальнейшем будет реализовываться функционал. Это может быть получение невероятного пре…
❤20🔥4
Video message, posted without a caption
❤18😁8🔥2
Из сегодняшних игр на мейне, я понял лишь одно — я хочу мут всей этой войс-нечести. Надо срочно делать глушилку, скриптеры, вы знаете, что делать.
❤19😁8🔥2
Прочитал новости, думал "Летняя чистка" - это что-то глобальное, как было ранее в связке с подобным словом, но важные моменты обновления можно ужать до пары строк. 🟢Улучшенный после игровой разбор Обновление DOTA+, более подробная статистика с разбивкой на категории. 🟢Исправление ошибок Перед The International, VALVE активно исправляют все баги, многие из вас вероятнее всего заметили оперативность выхода исправляющ…
❤27🔥6😁6
Теперь я крип. крипочек. Было 10800~ откатило до 7000 ММР, и знаете ли, мне нравится. Новости еще не открывал, но судя по моей личке, затронуло это только титанов, все игроки теперь находятся в диапазоне от 1 до 9000 ммр, при этом цифры ранга остались, иммортал драфт врубается после 8500 ММР. 2 стрима назад я только говорил об этом, спасибо Гейб, что залетаешь ко мне на трансляции. Хотел бы я сейчас посмотреть на…
❤15🔥4
Вот это я нормально поспал, заснул в одной вселенной, проснулся в параллельной. Сброс рейтинга в доте, в дедлоке наоборот добавили ммр. Сейчас раздуплюсь и пойду новости читать, заодно зайду на мейн посмотрю, что с моим рангом стало. А пока Вам утреннего пипа в ленту.
❤12🔥2😁2
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @db4k_exe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 450,708 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Db4k.exe” (@db4k_exe), 8,363 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/db4k_exe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.