Channel
@daydaygpt
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
244subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001937185141 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @daydaygpt |
| Description | 关注 GPT 发展动态、GPT 开发者生态 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/daydaygpt |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:31 | 244 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:37 | 244 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 November 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
9 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 6 | 66.7% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 November 2023 to 19 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Andrej Karpathy（ @karpathy ）昨天在旧金山人工智能创业学校发表主题演讲。 https://x.com/ycombinator/status/1935496106957488566 0:00 公平地说，软件领域又一次发生了翻天覆地的变化。法学硕士（LLM）是一种新型计算机，而且是用“英语”进行编程的。因此，我认为它们在软件方面完全值得进行一次重大版本升级。 6:06 LLM 兼具实用程序、工厂和操作系统的特性 => 新的 LLM 操作系统，由实验室开发，并像实用程序一样分发（目前如此）。许多历史相似之处适用——在我看来，我们现在的计算环境大约在 20 世纪 60 年代左右。 14:39 法学硕士 (LLM) 心理学：LLM 指的是“人类精神”，是对人类的随机模拟，其中的模拟器是一个自回归 Transformer。由于它们接受过人类数据的训练，因此拥有一种涌现式的心理学，在某些方面超越人类，但在其他许多…
❤1
AI 已不再只是玩具或潮流，而是影响认知结构、生产效率、社会格局的核心变量。
本 Channel 更名为 AI 视界， 今天起继续日常更新动态
Channel name was changed to «AI 视界»
https://nicholas.carlini.com/writing/2024/how-i-use-ai.html 学习
https://github.com/karpathy/LLM101n
给大家介绍一个学习资源，2024 年 4月斯坦福新开的 [Transfomer 课程]( https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLoROMvodv4rNiJRchCzutFw5ItR_Z27CM)，五一假期可以学习了。
https://baoyu.io/translations/ai-reports/stanford-hai-ai-index-report-2024
❤2👍1
https://huggingface.co/chat huggingface 自己也搞了一个chat
👍2
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/ranked-the-most-popular-ai-tools/
https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/UqfuCxhZ7cbpCh234Gob6w 比尔盖茨与萨姆·奥尔特曼的对话 | 盖茨播客
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @daydaygpt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 406,987 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AI 视界” (@daydaygpt), 244 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/daydaygpt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.