Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Vency

Channel

Vency

@davidvency

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,184subscribers

+6,550 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003621772854
TypeChannel
Username@davidvency
DescriptionInfo: nevency.com Direct: @vency Chat: @vencychat Core: @vencycore [email protected]
Created19 March 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/davidvency

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

2,63310,1026,367.57 August 2026 — 2,634 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,633 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,661 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,688 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,703 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,712 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,704 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,702 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,700 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,698 subscribers6 September 2026 — 2,674 subscribers11 September 2026 — 2,751 subscribers15 September 2026 — 2,744 subscribers19 September 2026 — 2,731 subscribers30 September 2026 — 2,725 subscribers7 October 2026 — 2,705 subscribers13 October 2026 — 2,691 subscribers16 October 2026 — 10,102 subscribers16 October 2026 — 10,092 subscribers17 October 2026 — 10,046 subscribers19 October 2026 — 10,038 subscribers20 October 2026 — 10,036 subscribers21 October 2026 — 10,034 subscribers22 October 2026 — 10,013 subscribers23 October 2026 — 9,992 subscribers26 October 2026 — 9,833 subscribers29 October 2026 — 9,796 subscribers1 November 2026 — 9,418 subscribers4 November 2026 — 9,285 subscribers7 November 2026 — 9,268 subscribers11 November 2026 — 9,184 subscribers9,1847 August 202611 November 2026
31 measurements spanning 96 days, net +6,550. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,513–11,222 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 11:409,184-84
7 Nov 2026, 20:549,268-17
4 Nov 2026, 17:569,285-133
1 Nov 2026, 09:469,418-378
29 Oct 2026, 14:599,796-37
26 Oct 2026, 13:569,833-159
23 Oct 2026, 10:069,992-21
22 Oct 2026, 09:4910,013-21
21 Oct 2026, 03:3510,034-2
20 Oct 2026, 03:4810,036-2
19 Oct 2026, 01:4710,038-8
17 Oct 2026, 23:0010,046-46
16 Oct 2026, 22:0810,092-10
16 Oct 2026, 00:4610,102+7,411
13 Oct 2026, 06:162,691-14
7 Oct 2026, 09:172,705-20
30 Sept 2026, 11:152,725-6
19 Sept 2026, 16:162,731-13
15 Sept 2026, 05:212,744-7
11 Sept 2026, 14:202,751first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 19 March 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.2%
avg views ÷ 9,184 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,230
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 October 2026
Posts held24 (19 March 2026 – 27 October 2026)
Views total6,675
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 21:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
10
Videos
6
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
55s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
132
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 23 we hold a reading for · 65%
Most on one post
59
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @davidvency. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 March 2026 to 27 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

27 Oct 2026, 13:16 UTC445 views0 reactions2 Starsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @daoksiPhoto

милой ублюдине исполнилось 24… фотки прикладываю, чтоб не забывали, родные, что по ту сторону экрана сидит тоже чья-то сестра…а может быть даже две… ну а ваще это полный дос я не верю что мне скоро 25 убейте пожалуйста мне страшно

25 Oct 2026, 13:30 UTC≈1,840 views0 reactions3 Starsread 4 November 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

23 Sept 2026, 22:18 UTC≈2,400 views0 reactions8 Starsread 4 November 2026
Video

posted this late, but thanks for the birthday edits

9 Aug 2026, 18:56 UTC≈61,200 views0 reactions4 Starsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Editing News is currently the largest community in the editing space. We already have 110,000 people, and our total views have surpassed 7 billion. Around 2,000 new people join us every single day, and more than 10,000 posts are published through Editing News. For me, this is only the beginning. I raised the Editing News flag above the Swiss Alps when I made our method free for everyone. We are now working on Editin…

4 Aug 2026, 22:01 UTC≈14,800 views0 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026

We fixed the no-compression HQ method. There are no checks and no hidden videos with this method - it works exactly as it should. Videos posted with the old method that got hidden have already started showing up again, though not all of them are back yet. We expect the rest to follow. It took us just one day to get everything back in order, and while the method was down, all our Premium users received compensation - …

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @davidvency. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Vency” (@davidvency), 9,184 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/davidvency.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.