Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for фандомик млп👅

Channel

фандомик млп👅

@davidmpl

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

123subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002378065517
TypeChannel
Username@davidmpl
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/davidmpl

Growth

123126124.57 August 2026 — 126 subscribers9 August 2026 — 126 subscribers16 August 2026 — 125 subscribers22 August 2026 — 123 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 123–126 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 22:05123-2
16 Aug 2026, 02:12125-1
9 Aug 2026, 02:17126no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:30126first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
13s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

979 reactions across 19 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤡37538.3%
🤮19620.0%
10110.3%
🖕747.56%
💩626.33%
❤‍🔥383.88%
👎282.86%
👍181.84%
🥰181.84%
😍161.63%
custom 5296362740951047041111.12%
custom 534397989660551562980.817%
🌚80.817%
💘80.817%
💯50.511%
😁40.409%
🔥30.306%
🤣20.204%
10.102%
🍓10.102%
2 further kinds20.204%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 979reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2025 to 21 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 19 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @davidmpl. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 April 2025 to 21 April 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Apr 2025, 17:27 UTC≈1,460 views52 reactions11 Starsread 9 August 2026

🤩

💩24🤡15❤‍🔥6🖕32💘1🔥1

21 Apr 2025, 15:14 UTC≈1,460 views81 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

я такого никогда не ожидал от своей лучшей подруги, из за моего тик тока такое делать.. у меня нет слов

🤡46🖕14🤮9❤‍🔥5🥰32💘1😱1

21 Apr 2025, 11:46 UTC≈1,380 views69 reactionsread 9 August 2026

любите меня нежно😓😓😔😔🌚🌚✌🏻✌🏻

🤮36🤡14💩11custom 534397989660551562953

21 Apr 2025, 10:07 UTC≈1,320 views89 reactionsread 9 August 2026

😓😓😓кто любит меня ❤️

🤡5221🖕8custom 52963627409510470416🌚2

20 Apr 2025, 17:59 UTC≈1,360 views64 reactionsread 9 August 2026

пр бывшие😹😹😹

🤮32🤡1311💩5🖕2💘1

20 Apr 2025, 17:02 UTC≈1,350 views62 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤮33🤡174❤‍🔥2👎2custom 529636274095104704121🥰1

20 Apr 2025, 17:02 UTC≈1,210 views40 reactionsread 9 August 2026

На самом деле 😔😓😔😓😔😓😔😓😔😓😔😓😔😓😔😓🫢😓🫢😓🫢😓🫢😓🫢😓🫢😓🫢😓🫢😓🫢😓🫢😓🫢😓🫢😓🫢😓🫢😓🫢😓🫢😓🫢😓🫢😓🫢😓🫢😓🫢😓🫢😓🫢😓🫢😓🫢😓🫢😓🫢ну пожалуйста подпишись😢😢😢

🤡24🤮63🖕3💩2💘1🤣1

19 Apr 2025, 10:03 UTC≈1,290 views88 reactions2 Starsread 9 August 2026
Video

мы слушаем и не осуждаем я считаю, что я самый красивый парень в тт.

🤡48😍16❤‍🔥8🤮6🖕5🥰21👎1

19 Apr 2025, 07:35 UTC≈1,140 views26 reactionsread 9 August 2026

тупа я по мнению хейтарав🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚:

🤡98💩7💘2

18 Apr 2025, 13:59 UTC≈1,030 views37 reactionsread 9 August 2026

я по мнению хейтеров

👍14💩75😁4🤡3🌚1🍓1💘1

18 Apr 2025, 13:59 UTC≈1,020 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤡16💩3

18 Apr 2025, 05:39 UTC≈1,020 views42 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026

привет мои фанаты👅👅👅👅

👎15🤡12🥰8🤮32🖕1🤬1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @davidmpl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Apr 2025, 16:59 UTCAnonymous Poll189 voters

вам теперь стыдно?

  1. да😢😢😢😢😢😢26%
  2. нет🤢🤢🤢74%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2025 to 21 April 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“фандомик млп👅” (@davidmpl), 123 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/davidmpl.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.