Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

David Icke Deutsch

@davidicke29

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8,584subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001430780825
TypeChannel
Username@davidicke29
DescriptionInfo Kanal inquiry/ contact 👇👇👇 proton.qjyn7@simplelogin.com
Created15 August 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/davidicke29

Growth

8,5848,5948,5896 August 2026 — 8,594 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,594 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,590 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,584 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,583–8,596 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 09:398,584-6
7 Aug 2026, 00:278,590-4
6 Aug 2026, 13:008,594no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:528,594first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
6,610
Videos
1,640
Links
6,850

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5m 48s
Average length
1m 27s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

686 reactions across 20 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤮25937.8%
👍10815.7%
🔥7510.9%
🤬7010.2%
💯568.16%
517.43%
😱233.35%
🌚213.06%
👀60.875%
🤯50.729%
😁40.583%
👎20.292%
🎉10.146%
🖕10.146%
😈10.146%
🤔10.146%
🥰10.146%
🥱10.146%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 686reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 26 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Jun 2026, 16:50 UTC≈4,770 views56 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Die Reichen erzählen Ihnen, der Planet brenne, um die Gesellschaft in ihr technokratisches, KI-gestütztes und zentralisiertes Kontrollsystem zu verwandeln. Dieses System beinhaltet Technologien wie die Ionosphärenheizung, die Sie glauben lassen, der Planet brenne (gepaart mit medialer Wetterhetze). Wer darauf hereinfällt, gibt den Reichen die Schuld an der von ihnen selbst propagierten Erderwärmung und fordert die Um

🔥20👍18💯97😁2

26 Jun 2026, 16:22 UTC≈4,470 views35 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Dies ist „Family“ (2019), eine Skulptur der estnischen Künstlerin Edith Karlson, die Teil der Kunstsammlung des Europäischen Parlaments ist. Es handelt sich um eine Installation, die aus drei reptilien- oder monsterähnlichen Figuren aus Beton, Metall und verschiedenen Mischmaterialien besteht. Die Figuren sind wie eine traditionelle Familie arrangiert, wobei eine der Elternfiguren einen gerahmten Miniaturnachbau ei

🤮14🌚11🔥43👎1🥱1😈1

26 Jun 2026, 11:11 UTC≈3,610 views60 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Painting that was on display at the European Parliament in Brussels. The artist is Lena Birgitta Cronqvist.

🤮51😱6🤯3

26 Jun 2026, 11:09 UTC≈3,030 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Jesus surrounded by ‘sadomasochistic disciples’. EU PARLAMENT KUNSTAUSSTELLUNG The exhibition of Swedish artist Elisabeth Ohlson

🤮13🔥8🌚53😱3👎1🤯1

26 Jun 2026, 10:06 UTC≈2,960 views44 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Der Flughafen von Denver installiert eine sprechende Gargoyle, die sagt: „Willkommen im Hauptquartier der Illuminati“. Auf dem internationalen Flughafen von Denver wurde eine sprechende animatronische Gargoyle installiert, die sich über die „Illuminati“-Verschwörungstheorien rund um den Flughafen lustig macht. Wenn man den wahren Zweck von Gargoyles versteht, wird die „Verschwörung“ nur noch undurchsichtiger.

🔥19🤮14🤬42💯2😁2🤯1

26 Jun 2026, 10:06 UTC≈2,660 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Danke für Ihre Geduld. Die Echsenmenschen stehlen ständig unsere Werkzeuge.😳

😱31🤮1

26 Jun 2026, 10:06 UTC≈2,590 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

"Entschuldigung für den Lärm. Man braucht wirklich große Bohrer, um in die Unterwelt zu gelangen."

🤮64

26 Jun 2026, 10:06 UTC≈2,560 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Die machen sich auch noch lustig über uns 👽 Ja, DEN hat einige Geheimnisse. Seit der Eröffnung des Flughafens im Jahr 1995 gibt es unzählige Gerüchte und Theorien. Die Leute sagen, unsere unterirdischen Tunnel führen zu geheimen Tagungsräumen für die Elite der Welt. Unser blaues Pferd gilt als verflucht. Manche glauben, wir stehen in Verbindung mit der Neuen Weltordnung, den Freimaurern und sind die Heimat der Echs

🤮32💯2

26 Jun 2026, 10:06 UTC≈2,470 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Der Flughafen Denver wirkt wie ein Portal – ein wirklich seltsamer Ort. Man spürt es sofort. Ich war schon dort und er war bei weitem der gruseligste Ort, den ich bislang besucht habe.

👍16😱7🤮4

26 Jun 2026, 10:06 UTC≈2,510 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Was machen wir? Wir fügen tolle neue Restaurants und Bars hinzu. Wir bauen ein Illuminati-Hauptquartier. Wir renovieren die Höhle der Echsenmenschen.

🤮191👍1

26 Jun 2026, 09:54 UTC≈2,310 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ich hatte schon vor Jahrzehnten mit den aktuellen Ereignissen recht und ich habe auch mit diesem recht Lachen Sie, so viel Sie wollen DAVID ICKE

👍303🔥1

26 Jun 2026, 09:53 UTC≈2,820 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥61🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @davidicke29. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 256,534 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“David Icke Deutsch” (@davidicke29), 8,584 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/davidicke29.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.