Channel
@davidharsanyi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
13subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002262257278 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @davidharsanyi |
| Description | Sr. writer, @dcexaminer syndicated columnist tauthor of a few books +cohost, You're Wrong w/@MZHemingway. My substack: shorturl.at/ GLw41 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/davidharsanyi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 13 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 13 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Gross. Every time Jews are massacred somewhere @RoKhanna goes on tv and shills for Hamas. The alternative is that they never have a state. There are 21 other Arab states. There are far more deserving ethnic minorities (most of them aren't even concocted like "Palestinians") who never have a country.
None of these policies would save any lives, anyway.
No, no, hell no, and no thank you.
There is absolutely nobody saying, “…Qatar is this hellscape with slave markets and, you know, women in Burkas or whatever…” It’s obviously not true, and it’s got nothing at all to do with why anyone objects to Qatar. No, they made Qatar into a western-facing luxury getaway place while they spend their money making sure OTHER PLACES are “hellscapes with slave markets and, you know women in Burkas or whatever.”
Hanukkah is about the war on interlopers and traitors. The story of Jews finding a single day’s oil in the Temple that miraculously burns was added centuries after the events by religious leaders who wanted to avoid fueling Jewish zealotry under Roman rule.
Don’t fall for the ‘banned books’ con washingtonexaminer.com/in_focus/39162… via @dcexaminer
Well, Oliver Sacks was a fraud.
I wonder why he picked those two.
So Christians can only ally with Jews if they are bought? I'm sure that makes sense to Jew-hating terror supporters, but not to anyone with a brain or moral compass.
Future Tucker guest.
Forget the lights, Hanukkah is a celebration of the Jewish state washingtonexaminer.com/in_focus/32654… via @dcexaminer
The left wants to democratize the only branch of gvt explicitly undemocratic: courts; they want (their) presidents to act as the legislative branch; and want an administrative fourth branch to function w/o oversite. I don't take their warning re constitutional order seriously
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @davidharsanyi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@davidharsanyi named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“David Harsanyi” (@davidharsanyi), 13 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/davidharsanyi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.