Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Datos Bíblicos

Channel

Datos Bíblicos

@datosbiblicos

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,251subscribers

-23 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001477303253
TypeChannel
Username@datosbiblicos
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/datosbiblicos

Growth

4,2514,2744,262.56 August 2026 — 4,274 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,274 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,265 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,253 subscribers15 August 2026 — 4,251 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 9 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,248–4,277 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 08:174,251-2
12 Aug 2026, 06:064,253-12
9 Aug 2026, 05:524,265-9
6 Aug 2026, 04:064,274no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:364,274first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
no view readings in window
Avg views / post
no view readings
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026
Posts held20 (22 January 202520 July 2026)
Views total
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

178 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7441.6%
👍4927.5%
👏158.43%
🙏147.87%
👌84.49%
🔥73.93%
😢63.37%
🤯42.25%
😱10.562%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 178reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 January 2025 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Jun 2026, 17:51 UTC≈1,130 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @daydiarod_blog

Conocí al señor en esta vida, en mi juventud. Tuve una familia en mi niñez, aunque fue difícil para mí; en mi adultez tuve un padre que me recibió y cuidó, aunque fue difícil para él. Estuve en un ministerio... lideré varios y serví de bendición a otros, eso me guió a conocer en profundidad el evangelio. Estuve casado, me fue fatal; pero obtuve la serenidad de mirar más allá del sufrimiento propio, para comprender el

8🙏3

29 Apr 2026, 18:40 UTC≈1,770 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ismaguimaraisPhoto

Pues acá está el artículo que les había anunciado: "Por qué no puedo ser ateo (ni aunque quisiera)". Cuento algo que me pasó a los 17 con quien hoy es mi esposa, y por qué después de eso no puedo simplemente apagar la fe. Es testimonio personal, pero pasado por probabilidad, memoria y revisión externa. Espero le sirva a alguien. En mi web 🛜 — https://guimarais.com/articulos/por-que-no-puedo-ser-ateo En Substack 📧 —

👌4👍21

27 Apr 2026, 21:33 UTC≈1,390 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ismaguimarais

Estoy sacando un artículo sobre por qué no puedo ni nunca podré ser ateo. Mientras tanto, pueden leer este sobre "El regreso del Todólogo". Les puede ayudar a abrir el horizonte sobre lo que las empresas están comenzando a necesitar urgentemente. En mi web 🛜 - https://guimarais.com/articulos/el-regreso-del-todologo En Substack 📧 https://substack.com/@ismaguimarais/note/p-193120587?utm_source=notes-share-action&r=7v

👌2

19 Apr 2026, 03:02 UTC≈1,550 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤔 Una razón histórica para tomar la Biblia en serio 🧠 Cuando los historiadores evalúan un texto antiguo, hay una señal que llama la atención: que el propio texto incrimine a sus figuras centrales. Mentir para elogiar es fácil pero conservar por escrito lo que avergüenza al movimiento es mucho más raro. 🤓 Otros libros antiguos también admiten fallas en sus personajes. Homero muestra la cólera de Aquiles y la astucia

👍5🔥3

11 Apr 2026, 04:53 UTC≈1,900 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

✳️ La dote de Jacob no fueron flores, fueron catorce años ✳️ 🧠 Hay una actitud que casi no tiene nombre. Es la del hombre que da más de lo que le piden. Que sirve antes de que se lo agradezcan. Que usa su fuerza y sus capacidades para aliviar la carga de otro, sin trato de por medio, sin llevar la cuenta. ⚠️ Es una actitud rara. Siempre lo fue. El hombre promedio mide lo que da, calcula, cobra, espera retorno. El q

11👍3👌1

9 Apr 2026, 19:48 UTC≈1,610 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

✳️ Cristo no compite con la verdad: Cristo es la Verdad ✳️ 🧠 Una de las ideas más repetidas hoy es que no existe una verdad objetiva, que todo son interpretaciones. Y es cierto que ningún ser humano conoce la realidad de manera perfecta. Todos vemos con límites, sesgos, con la historia que nos tocó y con lo poco que alcanzamos a entender. 😶 Pero de ahí no se sigue que la verdad no exista. Se sigue otra cosa muy dis

10👏2👌1🔥1🤯1

22 Nov 2025, 01:54 UTC≈3,430 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://youtu.be/nyfEnX-ov1Y?si=JzE5juyn1YIDxXue en 5 minutos se estrena el videolyric de la canción "La Soledad"

👍3

21 Nov 2025, 15:32 UTC≈3,220 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Te invito a escuchar mi nueva canción en todas las plataformas musicales: https://www.guimarais.com/la-soledad https://open.spotify.com/intl-es/album/5gAOQdp4eLDVJrIBBReF39 "La soledad es una iglesia sin espíritu Una casa sin familia, una máscara, un disfraz La soledad es una bomba en el ombligo Es tener muchos amigos y nadie con quien llorar La soledad es una fuerza que te hunde en la más negra de las nubes Cuan

👍32

24 Sept 2025, 21:04 UTC≈3,110 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @EseropianD

ATENCION USUARIOS DE AMAZON KINDLE ¡COMPREN YA! Solo por hoy, está a 0 dólar. Solo por hoy. Aprovechá a comprarlo y que te quede en tu biblioteca para leerlo cuando puedas. https://a.co/7L2WY92

8

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @datosbiblicos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 172,359 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Datos Bíblicos” (@datosbiblicos), 4,251 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/datosbiblicos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.