Channel
@data_interviews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,484subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002129442381 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @data_interviews |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/data_interviews |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:36 | 1,484 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:48 | 1,485 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:12 | 1,485 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 7 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
587 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 230 | 39.2% | |
| ❤ | 101 | 17.2% | |
| custom 5366346750548260124 | 95 | 16.2% | |
| 😭 | 58 | 9.88% | |
| custom 5818774589714468177 | 42 | 7.16% | |
| custom 5467489163035034363 | 23 | 3.92% | |
| 🤯 | 18 | 3.07% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 1.87% | |
| custom 5843504087986869413 | 9 | 1.53% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 587reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 November 2025 to 2 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
смирились с оверэмплойментом получается с другой стороны, это интересный ход — так можно найти квалифицированных кандидатов, которым нужна 2-3ья работа, за зп ниже рынка
🤯11custom 53663467505482601249
спите?
custom 536634675054826012414😭9🤯5❤3custom 58435040879868694131
Как вы оцениваете изменение зарплат на российском IT(data) рынке?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
хочу
😁25🔥6❤1
Собеседование в Авито: как после 5 собеседований я не получила оффер Сейчас отбор в Авито состоит из двух техничек и финалов в команды. Оба технических этапа длятся примерно час. На первом — одна задача на Python и несколько на SQL. На втором — одна на Python и одна на SQL. Интервьюеры были приятными — излишне не душнили, а задачи реалистичными — биты двигать не просили. Финалов было два: ⭕️На первом не дотянула гр…
❤13custom 58187745897144681779custom 58435040879868694135🤯1
Influence назвали оттенок помады ‘потоком данных’😭 жду выхода оттенка ‘ETL’
😁37custom 536634675054826012420custom 58435040879868694133
даже самой Grimes пришлось создать Linkedin аккаунт ну, и времена
😭12custom 54674891630350343639
как вам такое?🤭🙏🏽
😁52🤯1
Дорогие девушки этого канала, с праздником! 🌟 Не забывайте, какие вы крутые профессионалки и сколько всего уже достигли! Продолжайте верить в себя и в друг друга!💗
❤28custom 536634675054826012420custom 546748916303503436312😁3😭2
Русское слово «сложно» на английский можно перевести как difficult или hard. Однако эти два прилагательных не взаимозаменяемы. Для примера возьмём процесс набора мышечной массы хаха. Алгоритм действий понятен — следить за КБЖУ и заниматься силовыми тренировками. То есть всё вполне ясно и оттого вовсе не difficult, но при этом hard, потому что требует много дисциплины и мотивации. Надеюсь, аналогия понятна. Так вот…
custom 581877458971446817714❤6
Уже все телеграм каналы обсудили эту плашку у Ozon’a, но мне все равно хочется кое-что отметить. Забавляет не сама плашка, а то, что она у Ozon’a. Забавляет, потому что ни одна компания не отказывала мне так часто именно по причине нехватки опыта, как Ozon (те же самые Авито и Яндекс, например, резюме рассматривают), и из-за того, сколько знакомых накрутчиков там работают. Эта зацикленность на количестве лет в ито…
custom 581877458971446817711❤7
у меня нет слов, одни эмоции
😭25
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @data_interviews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как вы оцениваете изменение зарплат на российском IT(data) рынке?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
вы любите свою работу?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 November 2025 to 2 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дата-инженерские заметки” (@data_interviews), 1,484 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/data_interviews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.