3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,806–1,819 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 15:21
1,817
+8
7 Aug 2026, 16:16
1,809
+2
7 Aug 2026, 03:01
1,807
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
79.2%
avg views ÷ 1,817 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,440
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
21 (16 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
30,204
Reactions total
1,068
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 35s
Average length
2m 35s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,068 reactions across 20 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
361
33.8%
👍
311
29.1%
😢
67
6.27%
🔥
55
5.15%
😱
44
4.12%
🤓
32
3.00%
🤔
27
2.53%
😁
25
2.34%
🍓
17
1.59%
👏
17
1.59%
👎
14
1.31%
🙈
12
1.12%
😐
11
1.03%
🤡
9
0.843%
🤯
9
0.843%
🥰
8
0.749%
😡
6
0.562%
🦄
6
0.562%
👀
5
0.468%
💯
5
0.468%
13 further kinds
27
2.53%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,068reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
17
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 21 we hold a reading for · 57%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dat_kan. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🤩 У Нидерландов парадокс: для роста хватает денег — но не хватает пространства. И ресурсов, которые нельзя просто купить
Страна плотно заселена, места под застройку — мало, что не заселено людьми — занято фермами. (Учёные посчитали, что 19-20 млн жителей — голландский лимит). Строительство тормозят азотные ограничения и вагон требований с разных сторон. Электросеть — переполнена, новые предприятия и дома годами ждут…
📦 Посылку, оставленную в подъезде, могут украсть. А видеокамеру ставить ссыкотно
Это проблема для больших жилых комплексов, новых домов на десятки квартир. Курьеры зачастую не поднимаются на этаж и не вручают посылки лично — а оставляют их в холле.
Вообще-то это запрещено: по инструкции курьер PostNL, DHL и DPD обязан отдать её лично. Но он зарабатывает меньше 1 евро с посылки и разносить 100-200 таких по квартирам…
⭐️ В Амстердаме до сих пор нет моста через Эй – хотя его планируют уже 187 лет. ⭐️ И ещё не скоро будет
Если коротко: потому что Эй — до сих пор судоходная река. По ней ходят большие грузовые корабли, из порта – вглубь страны.
⬇️ Если построить низкий мост, его придётся постоянно разводить. Это никому не подходит. Порт Амстердама в гробу видел такую помеху своему бизнесу, судоходные компании и даже минтранс — тоже.…
Что у меня тут выходило в июле. Если вы вдруг пропустили
💬 Чиновников в Голландии заставляют писать просто и понятно. Это дикий кайф — тут
💲 На сколько денег живут голландцы? Точнее: как людям удаётся жить в Амстердаме на €2-3к в месяц? — тут
🏳️🌈 У нас тут прайд. Чо по толерантности и прочему ЛГБТQ+? — тут. Что нужно знать про прайд — тут
😊 Почему “хуе морхе”, если правильно писать “goede”? Там же есть буква "д"…
🌟 Мой новый любимый ютуб-канал — Studio Massa. Там что-то типа ускоренного курса истории Нидерландов
Только с шутками и очень стремительно: раз, два, три. Это как будто делал сдвгшник, который любит абсурдный юмор. (На голландском, но есть английские субтитры).
Персонажи в кадре — Вильгельм Оранский, отец нации, и Балтасар Герардс, его убийца.
📹 Смотрите, если вы не хотите дожидаться, пока я тут напишу:
— почему …
Чиновников в Голландии заставляют писать просто и понятно. Это дикий кайф
Получали письма от госорганов? Обращали внимание, как понятно, просто и человечно они зачастую написаны?
Это потому что, в Нидерландах есть специальная инициатива под названием Direct Duidelijk (“Прямо понятно”). Это добровольный, но неумолимо ползучий тренинг, к которому присоединяется всё больше госорганов.
А началось всё с термина jip-en-…
🎗 Украина хочет ускоренно в ЕС. Нидерланды теперь громче всех против – в кулуарах
Вообще да, обязательно, – но только после выполнения всех процедур.
Украинская логика такая: ускоренное членство, возможно, даже к какой-то дате (звучал и 2027 год) должно показать, что геополитический выбор страны уже не изменить. Ну и послевоенное восстановление должно пройти сразу по европейским лекалам.
Раньше европейцев "прикрыв…
⚙️ Нидерланды — не страна технарей. Здесь не так уж много желающих отучиться на программиста или инженера
Больше — про бизнес.
STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics; естественные и точные науки, или как говорят тут "bèta en techniek") изучают всего 18,6% студентов в вузах. Это третье место с конца в ЕС, меньше только на Кипре и Мальте. В Германии — аж вдвое больше.
Такое же отставание — на уровне сре…
Что нужно знать про прайд в Амстердаме
🚩 1. Он не в июне, как во всём мире — потому что тут это изначально не про борьбу
Классический гей-парад в мире — это протест и митинг. И поэтому в июне — в честь Стоунволлских бунтов, которые были именно в июне 1969-го. Pride Month во всём мире поэтому тоже — июнь.
Но амстердамский прайд придумали местные ЛГБТ-предприниматели в 1990-е. Их задача была продвигать среди туристо…
👳♂️ Национальность, цвет кожи или религию героев не укажут в голландских новостях, если она ничего не объясняет. Не все довольны
Это рекомендация нидерландского Совета по журналистике. Её придерживаются и общественная NOS, и частные Volkskrant, Trouw, Het Parool, и другие газеты — даже таблоиды с кричащими заголовками. В NRC вообще есть правило, что нужно не просто решить “да, напишем, что прохожего ножом пырнул им…
Голландцы не называют это "квартал красных фонарей". Тем более амстердамский
🧱 Если речь об Амстердаме — это De Wallen, "стены". В смысле "район внутри крепостных стен, старый центр".
Так получилось, потому что средневековый город в какой-то момент перестал быть престижным (богачи построили себе дома на каналах вокруг) — и его занял сначала народ попроще, а потом и маргиналы.
Средневековых стен уже давно нет, если…
❤8😐8👍4🍓2
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @dat_kan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Не указывать национальность, пока не подтверждена её связь с инфоповодом – норм?
Так и надо: это этично и не плодит предрассудки46%
Так не надо: это цензура и лицемерие54%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 399,068 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dat kan | объяснительные записки про Нидерланды” (@dat_kan), 1,817 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dat_kan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
